Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Originalia

Validierung einer deutschsprachigen 16-Item-Version des Inventars der Persönlichkeitsorganisation (IPO-16)

Published Online:January 15, 2013https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000076

Abstract

In diesem Artikel wird eine deutschsprachige Kurzskala des Inventars der Persönlichkeitsorganisation (IPO-16) vorgestellt und in drei klinischen Stichproben mit insgesamt 1300 Personen validiert. Das IPO ist ein international verbreitetes Selbsteinschätzungsinstrument, das in mehreren Versionen vorliegt und zur Erfassung von struktureller Beeinträchtigung in den Bereichen Identität, Abwehr und Realitätsprüfung eingesetzt wird. Die Kurzskala basiert auf 16 versionsübergreifenden IPO-Items und misst den Schweregrad der strukturellen Beeinträchtigung. In den Studien konnte gezeigt werden, dass das IPO-16 (1) intern konsistent ist, (2) eine modellkonforme Faktorenstruktur hat, (3) eine sehr hohe Überlappung zur IPO-Vollversion aufweist, (4) in der Selbsteinschätzung über konvergente und diskriminante Validität verfügt, (5) den Schweregrad der Persönlichkeitsstörung aus Expertensicht unabhängig vom aktuellen Leidensdruck vorhersagt und (6) eine diagnostische Effizienz erreicht, die mit anderen Screening-Instrumenten im Bereich der Persönlichkeitsstörungsdiagnostik vergleichbar ist. Mit dem IPO-16 liegt für den deutschsprachigen Raum erstmals ein ökonomisches und gut validiertes Selbsteinschätzungsinstrument zur Erfassung von struktureller Beeinträchtigung vor.


Validity of a German 16-item version of the Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-16)

This paper introduces a German short form of the Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-16). The IPO long form is a self-report instrument for the assessment of personality dysfunction in the domains of identity, defense, and reality testing. The IPO-16 measures general personality dysfunction and is based on 16 items representing the common denominator of several IPO versions currently available in German. Based on the data of 1,300 participants, it is shown that IPO-16 (1) is internally consistent, (2) has an acceptable CFA model-fit, (3) has a high overlap with the IPO long from, (4) shows good convergent and discriminant validity with regard to self-reports, (5) predicts expert ratings of personality pathology over and above general distress, and (6) reaches a diagnostic efficiency comparable to other screening instruments in the field of personality pathology. In sum, the IPO-16 is an economic and valid self-report instrument for the assessment of general personality dysfunction.

Literatur

  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR (4th ed). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Arbeitskreis OPD (2006). Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik OPD-2. Das Manual für Diagnostik und Therapieplanung. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bender, D. S. , Morey, L. C. & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 332 – 346. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ben-Dov, P. , Martínez, C. , Núñez, C. , Ortega, P. , Oksenberg, T. , Morales, A. et al. (2002). El Inventario de Organización de la Personalidad (IPO): Sus características y aplicaciones. Terapia Psicológica, 20, 41 – 51. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Benecke, C. , Koschier, A. , Peham, D. , Bock, A. , Dahlbender, R.W. , Biebl, W. et al. (2009). Erste Ergebnisse zu Reliabilität und Validität der OPD-2 Strukturachse. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 55, 84 – 96. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Benecke, C. , Tschiesner, R. , Boothe, B. , Frommer, J. , Huber, D. , Krause, R. et al. (2011). Die DPG-Studie. Vorstellung des Studiendesigns zur Untersuchung von Langzeiteffekten psychoanalytisch begründeten Psychotherapien. Forum der Psychoanalyse, 27, 203 – 218. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berghuis, H. , Kamphuis, J. H. , Boedijn, G. & Verheul, R. (2009) Psychometric properties and validity of the Dutch Inventory of Personality Organization (IPO-NL), Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 73, 44 – 60. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beutel, M. E. , Höflich, A. , Kurth, R. , Brosig, B. , Gieler, U. , Leweke, F. et al. (2005). Stationäre Kurz- und Langzeitpsychotherapie–Indikationen, Ergebnisse, Prädiktoren, Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 51, 145 – 162. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bornstein, R. F. (1998). Reconceptualizing personality disorder diagnosis in the DSM-V: The discriminant validity challenge. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 333 – 343. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caligor, E. , Kernberg, O. F. & Clarkin, J. F. (2007). Handbook of dynamic psychotherapy for higher level personality pathology. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284 – 290. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clarkin, J. F. , Caligor, E. , Stern, B. L. & Kernberg, O. F. (2004). Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO). Unpublished Manuscript. Personality Disorders Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clarkin, J. F. & Levy, K. N. (2004). The influence of client variables on psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 194 – 226). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clarkin, J. F. , Martius, P. , Dammann G., Smole , S. & Buchheim, P. (1998). IPO–„Inventory of Personality Organization”: Ein Selbstbeurteilungs-Instrument zur Erfassung der Persönlichkeitsorganisation, Persönlichkeitsstörungen, 2, 169 – 172. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clarkin, J. F. , Yeomans, F. & Kernberg, O.F. (2006). Psychotherapy of borderline personality: Focusing on object relations. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Critchfield, K. L. , Levy, K. N. & Clarkin, J. F. (2004). The relationship between impulsivity, aggression, and impulsive-aggression in Borderline Personality Disorder: An empirical analysis of self-report measures. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 555 – 570. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dammann, G. , Smole-Lindinger, S. & Buchheim, P. (2002). IPO–Inventar der Persönlichkeitsorganisation. In E. Brähler, J. Schumacher & B. Strauß (Hrsg.), Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie (S. 217 – 221). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dammann, G. , Hörz, S. & Clarkin, J. F. (2012). Das Inventar der Persönlichkeitsorganisation (IPO). In S. Döring & S. Hörz (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Strukturdiagnostik. Konzepte, Instrumente, Praxis (S. 269 – 283). Stuttgart: Schattauer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466 – 491. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Franke, G. H. (1997). ‘The whole is more than the sum of its parts’: The effects of grouping and randomizing items on the reliability and validity of questionnaires. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 67 – 74. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Franke, G. H. (2000). Brief Symptom Inventory von L. R. Derogatis (Kurzform der SCL-90-R). Deutsche Version. Göttingen: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Franke, G. H. (2002). SCL-90-R. Symptom-Checkliste von L. R. Derogatis. Deutsche Version. (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Beltz. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fydrich, T. , Renneberg, B. , Schmitz, B. & Wittchen, H.-U. (1997). SKID-II. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse II: Persönlichkeitsstörungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. & Wilson, T. D. (2010). Consciousness, introspection, and the adaptive unconscious. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Hrsg.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (S. 197 – 215). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hopwood, C. J. , Malone, J. C. , Ansell, E. B. , Sanislow C. A., Grillo , C. M., McGlashan , T. H. et al. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 305 – 320. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horowitz, L. M. , Strauß, B. & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme. Deutsche Version. Manual. (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hörz, S. , Rentrop, M. , Fischer-Kern, M. , Schuster, P. , Kapusta, N. , Buchheim, P. et al. (2010). Strukturniveau und klinischer Schweregrad der Borderline-Persönlichkeitsstörung. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 56, 136 – 149. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Igarashi, H. , Kikuchi, H. , Kano, R. , Mitoma, H. , Shono, M. , Hasui, C. et al. (2009). The Inventory of Personality Organisation: Its psychometric properties among student and clinical populations in Japan. Annals of General Psychiatry, 8, 9. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kernberg, O. F. & Caligor, E. (2005). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In M. F. Lenzenweger & J. F. Clarkin (Hrsg.). Major theories of personality disorder (2nd ed., pp. 114 – 156). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe personality disorders: Psychotherapeutic strategies. New Haven: Yale University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kernberg, O. F. (1996). Ein psychoanalytisches Modell der Klassifizierung von Persönlichkeitsstörungen. Psychotherapeut, 41, 288 – 296. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kraus, C. , Dammann, G. , Rothgordt, J. & Berner W. (2004). Persönlichkeitsstörungen und Persönlichkeitsorganisation bei Sexualdelinquenten, Recht & Psychiatrie, 22, 95 – 104. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121 – 1134. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leichsenring, F. (1999). Development and first results of the Borderline Personality Inventory: A self-report instrument for assessing borderline personality organization. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 45 – 63. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leising, D. , Krause, S. , Köhler, D. , Hinsen, K. & Clinton, A. (2011). Assessing interpersonal functioning: Views from within and without. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 631 – 641. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leising, D. & Zimmermann, J. (2011). An integrative conceptual framework for assessing personality and personality pathology. Review of General Psychology, 15, 317 – 330. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lenzenweger, M. F. , Clarkin, J. F. , Kernberg, O. F. & Foelsch, P. A. (2001). The Inventory of Personality Organization: Psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 13, 577 – 591. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Livesley, W. (1998). Suggestions for a framework for an empirically based classification of personality disorder. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 137 – 147. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morse, J. Q. & Pilkonis, P. A. (2007). Screening for personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 179 – 198. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mullen, L. S. , Blanco, C. , Vaughan, S. C. , Vaughan, R. & Roose, S. P. (1999). Defense mechanisms and personality in depression. Depression and Anxiety, 10, 168 – 174. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus User’s Guide. Fifth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Normandin, L. , Sabourin, S. , Diguer, L. , Dupont, G. , Poitras, K. , Foelsch, P. , et al. (2002). Évaluation de la validité théorique de l’Inventaire de l’organisation de la personnalité. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 59 – 65. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oltmanns, T. F. & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. In R. F. Krueger & J. L. Tackett (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 71 – 111). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, G. , Both, L. , Olley, A. , Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. , Irvine, P. & Jacobs, G. (2002). Defining disordered personality functioning. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16, 503 – 522. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224 – 239). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, M. D. & Gordon, K. H. (2011). Personality dynamics: Insights from the personality social cognitive literature. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 161 – 176. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rudolf, G. (2002). Struktur als psychodynamisches Konzept der Persönlichkeit. In G. Rudolf, T. Grande & P. Henningsen (Hrsg.), Die Struktur der Persönlichkeit. Vom theoretischen Verständnis zur therapeutischen Anwendung des psychodynamischen Strukturkonzepts (S. 2 – 48). Stuttgart: Schattauer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schauenburg, H. , Dinger, U. , Komo-Lang, M. , Klinkerfuß, M. , Horsch, L. , Grande, T. , et al. (2012): Der OPD-Strukturfragebogen (OPD-SF). In S. Döring & S. Hörz (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Strukturdiagnostik. Konzepte, Instrumente, Praxis (S. 284 – 307). Stuttgart: Schattauer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. , Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23 – 74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Skodol, A. E. , Bender, D. S. , Oldham, J. M. , Clark, L. A. , Morey, L. C. , Verheul, R. et al. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part II: Clinical application. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 23 – 40. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Skodol, A. E. (2012). Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317 – 344. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, G. T. , McCarthy, D. M. & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102 – 111. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smits, D. M. , Vermote, R. , Claes, L. & Vertommen, H. (2009). The Inventory of Personality Organization–Revised: Construction of an abridged version. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 223 – 230. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Stern, B. L. , Caligor, E. , Clarkin, J. F. , Critchfield, K. L. , Hörz, S. , MacCornack, V. et al. (2010). Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO): Preliminary psychometrics in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 35 – 44. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thobaben, A. & Soldt, P. (2007). Charakterpathologie–Persönlichkeitsorganisation–Strukturniveaus: Psychodynamische Modelle der Strukturpathologie im Vergleich. Forum der Psychoanalyse, 23, 330 – 342. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thomas, A. & Strauß, B. (2008). Diagnostische Methoden nach dem Interpersonalen Modell der Persönlichkeit. Klinische Diagnostik und Evaluation, 1, 255 – 277. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tyrer, P. , Crawford, M. & Mulder, R. (2011). Reclassifying personality disorders. The Lancet, 377, 1814 – 1815. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tyrer, P. & Johnson, T. (1996). Establishing the severity of personality disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 1593 – 1597. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Verheul, R. , Andrea, H. , Berghout, C. , Dolan, C. , Busschbach, J. , van der Kroft, P. et al. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20, 23 – 34. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Widiger, T. A. & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71 – 83. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wittchen, H.-U. , Wunderlich, U. , Gruschwitz, S. & Zaudig, M. (1997). SKID-I. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV. Achse I: Psychische Störungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • World Health Organization (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Genf: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmermann, J. , Ehrenthal, J. C. , Cierpka, M. , Schauenburg, H. , Doering, S. & Benecke, C. (2012). Assessing the level of structural integration using Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD): Implications for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 522 – 532. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, M. , Rothschild, L. & Chelminski, I. (2005). The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1911 – 1918. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar