Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Proximal Sensor Data from Routine Dual-Sensor Esophageal pH Monitoring Is Often Inaccurate

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring is routinely used to diagnose GERD. However, the proximal sensor may not be in proximal esophagus in patients with shortened esophagi. Our objective was to determine how often the proximal sensor was misplaced and to determine the effect on pH monitoring. Superior margins of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES and LES) were determined prospectively in consecutive patients. Dual sensors were placed 20 and 5 cm above the LES with a fixed 15-cm spacing pH catheter. Patients were classified into subgroups based on the actual location of the proximal sensor. In 661 patients, the proximal pH sensor was in the hypopharynx in 9% of patients, within the UES in 36%, and in the proximal esophagus in 55%. Spearman's correlation for acid exposure was very good between the dual sensors when the proximal sensor was in the proximal esophagus (R=0.76) but was poor when the proximal sensor was misplaced in the hypopharynx (R=0.28). The proximal sensor was misplaced in 45% of patients undergoing dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring. It is important to locate the UES by manometry before interpreting the proximal esophageal pH data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Wo JM, Hunter JG, Waring JP: Dual-channel ambulatory esophageal pHmonitoring.Auseful diagnostic tool? Dig Dis Sci 42:2222-2226, 1997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dibaise JK, Lof J, Quigley EM: Can symptoms predict esophageal motor function or acid exposure in gastroesophageal reflux disease? A comparison of esophageal manometric and twenty-four-hour pH parameters in typical and extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 32:128-132, 2001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patti MG, Debas HT, Pellegrini CA: Clinical and functional characterization of high gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Surg 165:163-166, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gastal OL, Castell JA, Castell DO: Frequency and site of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with chest symptoms. Studies using proximal and distal pH monitoring. Chest 106:1793-1796, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schnatz PF, Castell JA, Castell DO: Pulmonary symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux: Use of ambulatory pH monitoring to diagnose and to direct therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 91:1715-1718, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobhan R, Castell DO: Normal and abnormal proximal esophageal acid exposure: Results of ambulatory dual-probe pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 88:25-29, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Q, Castell JA, Castell DO: Manometric determination of esophageal length. Am J Gastroenterol 89:722-725, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Awad ZT, Watson P, Filipi CJ, Marsh RE, Tomonaga T, Shiino Y, Bhatia S, Boedefeld W, III: Correlations between esophageal diseases and manometric length: a study of 617 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 3:483-488, 1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR: Twenty-four hours pH monitoring: a quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. AmJ Gastroenterol 63:325-332, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  10. Emde C, Garrett CG, Blum AL: Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: Current status and recommendations. Gut 88:1177-1188, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wo JM, Jabbar A, Winstead W, Goudy S, Cacchione R, Allen JW: Hypopharyngeal pH monitoring artifact in detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Dig Dis Sci 47:2579-2585, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Logemann JA, Shaker R: Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutition. Gastroenterology 95:52-62, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang IM, Shaker R: Anatomy and physiology of the uper esophageal sphincter. Am J Med 103:50S-55S, 1997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sivarao DV, Goyal RK: Functional anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Med 108 (Suppl 4a):27S-37S, 2000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomonaga T, Awad ZT, Filipi CJ, Hinder RA, Selima M, Tercero F Jr, Marsh RE, Shiino Y, Welch R: Symptom predictability of refluxinduced respiratory disease. Dig Dis Sci 47:9-14, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacob P, Kahrilas PJ, Herzon G: Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with 'reflux laryngitis.' Gastroenterology 100:305-310, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaker R, Dodds WJ, Ren J, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC: Esophagoglottal closure reflex: A mechanism of airway protection. Gastroenterol 102:857-861, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harding SM, Richter JE, Guzzo MR, Schan CA, Alexander RW, Bradley LA: Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux: Acid suppressive therapy improves asthma outcome. Am J Med 100:395-405, 1996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Theodoropoulos DS, Ledford DK, Lockey RF, Pecoraro DL, Rodriguez JA, Johnson MC, Boyce HW Jr: Prevalence of upper respiratory symptoms in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 164:72-76, 2001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klingler PJ, Hinder RA, Wetscher GJ, Davis DM, Achem SR, Seelig MH, O'Brien P, DeVault KR: Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe. Am J Gastroenterol 95:906-909, 2000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weusten BL, Akkermans LM, Vanberge-Henegouwen GP, Smout AJ: Spatiotemporal characteristics of physiological gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Physiol 266:G357-G362, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaker R, Milbrath M, Ren J, Toohill R, Hogan WJ, Li Q, Hofmann CL: Esophagopharyngeal distribution of refluxed gastric acid in patients with reflux laryngitis. Gastroenterology 109:1575-1582, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harding SM, Guzzo MR, Richter JE: The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in asthma patients without reflux symptoms. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 162:34-39, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vaezi M, Schroeder P, Richter JE: Reproducibililty of proximal probe pH parameters in 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterology 92:825-829, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Wyman JB, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC: Upper esophageal sphincter function during belching. Gastroenterology 91:133-140, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Torrico S, Kern M, Aslam M, Narayanan S, Kannappan A, Ren J, Sui Z, Hofmann C, Shaker R: Upper esophageal sphincter function during gastroesophageal reflux events revisited. Am J Physiol 279:G262-G267, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fulp SR, Dalton C, Castell JA, Castell DO: Aging-related alterations in human upper esophageal sphincter function. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1569-1572, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA

    Matt McCollough, Abdul Jabbar, Jeff W. Allen, Steve Harrell & John M. Wo

  2. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA

    Robert Cacchione

Authors
  1. Matt McCollough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdul Jabbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Cacchione
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeff W. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steve Harrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. John M. Wo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCollough, M., Jabbar, A., Cacchione, R. et al. Proximal Sensor Data from Routine Dual-Sensor Esophageal pH Monitoring Is Often Inaccurate. Dig Dis Sci 49, 1607–1611 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DDAS.0000043372.98660.82

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DDAS.0000043372.98660.82

Search

Navigation