Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of life in the first year after breast cancer surgery: rehabilitation needs and patterns of recovery

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. Although mortality rates from breast cancer are declining, many breast cancer survivors will experience physical and psychological sequelae that affect their everyday lives. Few prospective studies have examined the rehabilitation needs of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, and little is known about the predictors of health‐related quality of life (QOL) in this population.

Methods. Between 1987 and 1990, 227 women with early stage breast cancer participated in a prospective longitudinal study in which detailed information was collected through interviews, standardized measures of QOL and psychological distress, and clinical evaluation. Comparisons of physical and treatment‐related problems were made according to type of surgical treatment. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to examine the predictors of QOL at one year after surgery.

Results. Physical and treatment‐related problems were reported frequently one month after breast cancer surgery, and occurred with equal frequency in women receiving modified radical mastectomy or breast conservation treatment. There were no significant differences in problems reported at one year by type of surgery; however, frequently reported problems include ‘numbness in the chest wall or axilla,’ ‘tightness, pulling or stretching in the arm or axilla,’ ‘less energy or fatigue,’ ‘difficulty in sleeping,’ and ‘hot flashes’. There was no relationship between the type of surgery and mood or QOL. Poorer QOL one year after surgery was significantly associated with greater mood disturbance and body image discomfort one month after surgery, as well as positive lymph node involvement. Although the majority of patients experienced substantial disruptions in the physical and psychosocial dimensions of QOL post‐operatively, most women recovered during the year after surgery, with only a minority (<10%) significantly worsening during that time.

Conclusions. At one year after surgery, most women report high levels of functioning and QOL, with no relationship between the type of surgery and QOL. Women who reported lower levels of QOL at one year after diagnosis had greater mood disturbance and poorer body image one month after surgery, as well as lower income and positive axillary nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beral V, Hermon C, Reeves G, Peto R: Sudden fall in breast cancer death rates in England and Wales. Lancet 345: 1642–1643, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cole P, Rodu B: Declining cancer mortality in the United States. Cancer 78: 2045–2048, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganz PA, Coscarelli A, Fred C, et al.: Breast cancer survivors: psychosocial concerns and quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat 38: 183–199, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganz PA, Schag CAC, Lee JJ, et al.: Breast conservation versus mastectomy: Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 69: 1729–1738, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Irvine D, Brown B, Crooks D, et al.: Psychosocial adjustment in women with breast cancer. Cancer 67: 1097–1117, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese M, et al.: Five years of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of cancer. N Eng J Med 312: 665–673, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  7. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, et al.: Conservative treatment of early breast cancer; Longterm results of 1232 cases treated with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy. Ann Surg 211: 250–259, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pozo C, Carver CS, Noriega V, et al.: Effects of mastectomy versus lumpectomy on emotional adjustment to breast cancer: a prospective study of the first year postsurgery. J Clin Oncol 10: 1292–1298, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlsson M, Hamrin E: Psychological and psychosocial aspects of breast cancer and breast cancer treatment: a literature review. Cancer Nursing 17: 418-428, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall A, Fallowfield L: Psychological outcome of treatment for early breast cancer: a review. Stress Medicine 5: 167–175, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schain WS, Fetting JH: Modified radical mastectomy versus breast conservation: Psychosocial considerations. Sem Oncol 19: 239–243, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschênes L: Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: a comparison of partial and total mastectomy. J Clin Epidemiol 42: 765–771, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shimozuma K, Sonoo H, Ichihara K, et al.: The impacts of breast conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life in early-stage breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 2: 35–43, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kemeny M, Wellisch DK, Schain WS: Psychosocial outcome in a randomized surgical trial for treatment of primary breast cancer. Cancer 62: 1231–1237, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lasry J-C M, Margolese RG, Poisson R, et al.: Depression and body image following mastectomy and lumpectomy. J Chronic Dis 40: 529–534, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Margolis G, Goodman RL, Rubin A: Psychological effects of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy. Psychosomatics 31: 33–39, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wellisch DK, DiMatteo R, Silverstein M, et al.: Psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer therapies: lumpectomy versus mastectomy. Psychosomatics 30: 365–373, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yilmazer N, Aydiner A, Özkan S, et al.: A comparison of body image, self-esteem and social support in total mastectomy and breast-conserving therapy in Turkish women. Supportive Care in Cancer 2: 238–241, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor SE, Lichtman RR, Wood JV, et al.: Illness-related and treatment-related factors in psychological adjustment to breast cancer. Cancer 55: 2506–2513, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinberg MID, Juliano MA, Wise L: Psychological outcome of lumpectomy versus mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. Am J Psychiatry 142: 34–39, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aaronson NK, Bartelink H, van Dongen JA, et al.: Evaluation of breast conserving therapy: clinical, methodological and psychosocial perspectives. Eur J Surg Oncol 14: 133–140, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Noguchi M, Kitagawa H, Kinoshita K, et al.: Psychologic and cosmetic self-assessments of breast conserving therapy compared with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 54: 260–266, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Noguchi M, Saito Y, Nishijima H, et al.: The psychological and cosmetic aspects of breast conserving therapy compared with radical mastectomy. Surg Today 23: 598–602, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartelink H, van Dam F, van Dongen J: Psychological effects of breast conserving therapy in comparison with radical mastectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11: 381–385, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer L, Aspegren K: Long-term psychological sequelae of mastectomy and breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. Acta Oncol 28: 13–18, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Omne-Pontén M, Holmberg L, Burns T, et al.: Determinations of the psycho-social outcome after operation for breast cancer. Results of a prospective comparative interview study following mastectomy and breast conservation. Eur J Cancer 28A: 1062–1067, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moyer A: Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a metaanalytic review. Health Psychology 16: 284–298, 1997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ganz PA: Sexual functioning after breast cancer: a conceptual framework for future studies. Ann Oncol 8: 105–107, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  29. Couzi RJ, Helzlsouer KJ, Fetting JH: Prevalence of menopausal symptoms among women with a history of breast cancer and attitudes toward estrogen replacement therapy. J Clin Oncol 13: 2737–2744, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bines J, Oleske DM, Cobleigh MA: Ovarian function in premenopausal women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14: 1718–1729, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tasmuth T, von Smitten K, Kalso E: Pain and other symptoms during the first year after radical and conservative surgery for breast cancer. Br J Cancer 74: 2024–2031, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hürny C, Bernhard J, Coates AS, et al., for the International Breast Cancer Study Group: Impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive operable breast cancer. Lancet 347: 1279–1284, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Farrow DC, Hunt WC, Samet JM: Geographic evaluation in the treatment of localized breast cancer. N Engl J Med 326: 1097–1101, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, et al.: Geographic variation in the use of breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 326: 1102–1107, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Silliman RA, Guadagnoli E, Weitberg AB, et al.: Age as a predictor of diagnostic and initial treatment intensity in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Gerontol 44: M46–M50, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Greenfield S, Blanco DM, Elashoff RM, et al.: Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients. JAMA 257: 2766–2770, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Maraste R, Brandt L, Olsson A, et al.: Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at start of adjuvant radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 31: 641–643, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mor V, Malin M, Allen S: Age differences in psychosocial problems encountered by breast cancer patients. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16: 191–197, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schover LR: Sexuality and body image in younger women with breast cancer. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16: 177–182, 1994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Glanz K, Lerman C: Psychosocial impact of breast cancer: a critical review. Ann Behav Med 14: 204–212, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vinokur A, Threatt BA, Vinokur-Kaplan D, et al.: The process of recovery from breast cancer for younger and older patients: changes during the first year. Cancer 65: 1242–1254, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ganz PA, Schag CC, Cheng H: Assessing the quality of life - A study in newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 43: 75–86, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, et al.: Cosmetic and functional outcome of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. Radiotherapy and Oncology 25: 160–166, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kiebert GM, de Haes JCJM, van de Velde CJH: The impact of breast conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol 9: 1059–1070, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ganz PA, Lee JJ, Sim M-S, et al.: Exploring the influence of multiple variables on the relationship of age to quality of life in women with breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 45: 473–485, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ganz PA, Hirji K, Sim MS, et al.: Predicting psychosocial risk in patients with breast cancer. Med Care 31: 419–431, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schag CAC, Ganz PA, Polinsky ML, et al.: Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 11: 783–793, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Polinsky ML, Fred C, Ganz PA: Quantitative and qualitative assessment of a case management program for cancer patients. Health and Social Work 16: 176–183, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ganz PA, Rofessart J, Polinsky ML, et al.: A comprehensive approach to the assessment of cancer patient's rehabilitation needs: the cancer inventory of problem situations and a companion interview. J Psychosoc Oncol 4: 27–42, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schag CAC, Heinrich RL, Aadland RL, et al.: Assessing problems of cancer patients: Psychometric properties of the Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations. Health Psychol 9: 83–102, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH: The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: McCleod CM (ed) Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1949, pp 191–205

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA: Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2: 187–193, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. McNair PM, Lorr M, Droppelman L: EITS manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1971/1981

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wolberg WH, Romsaas EP, Tanner MA, et al.: Psychosexual adaptation to breast cancer surgery. Cancer 63: 1645–1655, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cella DF, Tross S, Orav EJ, et al.: Mood states of patients after the diagnosis of cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 7: 45–54, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  56. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Lee JK, et al.: Breast conservation versus mastectomy: distress sequelae as a function of choice. J Clin Oncol 7: 367–375, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Hoffman RG, Walker AP, Goodwin JS: Minimal increase in use of breast-conserving surgery from 1986 to 1990. Med Care 34(5): 479–489, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE: Life after breast cancer: understanding women's healthrelated quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol 16: 501–514, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Desmond KA: Impact of different adjuvant therapy strategies on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Recent Results in Cancer Research 152: 396–411, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. McMasters KM, Giuliano AE, Ross MI, et al.: Sentinellymph-node biopsy for breast cancer - not yet the standard of care. N Engl J Med 339: 990–995, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gerber L, Lampert M, Wood C, et al.: Comparison of pain, motion, and edema after modified radical mastectomy versus local excision with axillary dissection and radiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 21: 139–145, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hack TF, Cohen L, Katz J, et al.: Physical and psychological morbidity after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17: 143–149, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Shimozuma K, Sonoo H, Ichihara K: Analysis of the factors influencing the quality of life of patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. Surg Today 25: 874–882, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Camoriano JK, Loprinzi CL, Ingle JN, et al.: Weight change in women treated with adjuvant therapy or observed following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 8: 1327–1334, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Moyer A, Salovey P: Psychosocial sequelae of breast cancer and its treatment. Ann Behavioral Medicine 18: 11–125, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  66. Morris T, Royle GT: Offering patients a choice of surgery for early breast cancer. A reduction in anxiety and depression in patients and their husbands. Soc Sci Med 26: 583–585, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kiebert GM, Stiggelbout AM, Kievit J, et al.: Choices in oncology: factors that influence patient's treatment preference. Quality Life Res 3: 175–182, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  68. Fallowfield L: Offering choice of surgical treatment to women with breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling 30: 209–214, 1997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Primomo J, Yates BS, Woods NK: Social support for women during chronic illness: the relationship among sources and types of adjustment. Res Nurs Health 13: 153–161, 1990

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Division, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki–City, Japan

    Kojiro Shimozuma

  2. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

    Patricia A. Ganz & Laura Petersen

  3. Department of Biomathematics, UCLA School of Medicine, and the BASE Unit, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

    Karim Hirji

Authors
  1. Kojiro Shimozuma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia A. Ganz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karim Hirji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimozuma, K., Ganz, P.A., Petersen, L. et al. Quality of life in the first year after breast cancer surgery: rehabilitation needs and patterns of recovery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 56, 45–57 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006214830854

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006214830854

Search

Navigation