Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:42:42.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptualization of psycho-existential suffering by the Japanese Task Force: The first step of a nationwide project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2006

HISAYUKI MURATA  and
TATSUYA MORITA
HISAYUKI MURATA
Affiliation:
School of Human Culture, Kyoto Notredame University, Kyoto, Japan
TATSUYA MORITA
Affiliation:
Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Palliative Care Team and Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background and purpose: Although the relief of psycho-existential or spiritual suffering is one of the most important roles of palliative care clinicians, lack of an accepted conceptual framework leads to considerable confusion in research in this field. The primary aim of this article is to illustrate the process of developing a conceptual framework by the Japanese Task Force as the initial step of a nationwide project.

Methods: We used consensus-building methods with 26 panel members and 100 multidisciplinary peer reviewers. The panel consisted of six palliative care physicians, six psychiatrists, five nursing experts, four social workers or psychologists, two philosophers, a pastoral care worker, a sociologist, and an occupational therapist. Through 2 days of face-to-face discussion and follow-up discussion by e-mail, we reached a consensus.

Results: The group agreed to adopt a conceptual framework as the starting point of this study, by combining the empirical model from multicenter observations, a theoretical hypothesis, and good death studies in Japan. We defined “psycho-existential suffering” as “pain caused by extinction of the being and the meaning of the self.” We assumed that psycho-existential suffering is caused by the loss of essential components that compose the being and the meaning of human beings: loss of relationships (with others), loss of autonomy (independence, control over future, continuity of self), and loss of temporality (the future). Sense of meaning and peace of mind can be interpreted as an outcome of the psycho-existential state and thus the general end points of our interventions. This model extracted seven categories to be intensively studied in the future: relationship, control, continuity of self, burden to others, generativity, death anxiety, and hope.

Conclusions: A Japanese nationwide multidisciplinary group agreed on a conceptual framework to facilitate research in psycho-existential suffering in terminally ill cancer patients. This model will be revised according to continuing qualitative studies, surveys, and intervention trials.

Keywords

Existential sufferingSpiritualityConceptDefinition
Type
Research Article
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 279 - 285
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Block, S.D. (2001). Psychological considerations, growth, and transcendence at the end of life. JAMA, 285, 2898–2905.Google Scholar
Breitbart, W. (2002). Spirituality and meaning in supportive care: Spirituality- and meaning-centered group psychotherapy interventions in advanced cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 10, 272–280.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M. (2002). Dignity-conserving care: A new model for palliative care: Helping the patient feel valued. JAMA, 287, 2253–2260.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M., Hack, T., Hassard, T., et al. (2005). Dignity therapy: A novel psychotherapeutic intervention for patients near the end of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 5520–5525.Google Scholar
Chochinov, H.M., Hack, T., McClement, S., et al. (2002). Dignity in the terminally ill: A developing empirical model. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 433–443.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Trans. by J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson. London: Blackwell.
Hirai, K., Miyashita, M., Morita, T., et al. (2006). Good death in Japanese cancer care: A qualitative study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31, 140–147.Google Scholar
Kawa, M., Kayama, M., Maeyama, E., et al. (2003). Distress of inpatients with terminal cancer in Japanese palliative care units: From the viewpoint of spirituality. Supportive Care in Cancer, 11, 481–490.Google Scholar
Kissane, D.W., Clarke, D.M., & Street, A.F. (2001). Demoralization syndrome—A relevant psychiatric diagnosis for palliative care. Journal of Palliative Care, 17, 12–21.Google Scholar
Miyashita, M., Sanjo, M., Morita, T., et al. (2006). Good death in Japan: A nationwide quantitative survey, Proceedings of the 11th Congress of Japan society of palliative medicine; June 23–34; Kobe, Japan. p. 82.
Morita, T. (2004). Palliative sedation to relieve psycho-existential suffering of terminally ill cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 28, 445–450.Google Scholar
Morita, T., Kawa, M., Honke, Y., et al. (2004a). Existential concerns of terminally ill cancer patients receiving specialized palliative care in Japan. Supportive Care in Cancer, 12, 137–140.Google Scholar
Morita, T., Sakaguchi, Y., Hirai, K., et al. (2004b). Desire for death and requests to hasten death of Japanese terminally ill cancer patients receiving specialized inpatients palliative care. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 27, 44–52.Google Scholar
Morita, T., Tsunoda, J., Inoue, S., et al. (2000). An exploratory factor analysis of existential suffering in Japanese terminally ill cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 9, 164–168.Google Scholar
Murata, H. (2003). Spiritual pain and its care in patients with terminal cancer: Construction of a conceptual framework by philosophical approach. Palliative & Supportive Care, 1, 15–21.Google Scholar
Noguchi, W., Ohno, T., Morita, S., et al. (2004a). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp) for Japanese patients with cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 12, 240–245.Google Scholar
Noguchi, W., Ohno, T., Morita, S., et al. (2004b). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment Of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual (FACIT-Sp) Japanese version in cancer patients—A preliminary study. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 31, 387–391.Google Scholar
Passik, S.D., Kirsh, K.L., Leibee, S., et al. (2004). A feasibility study of dignity psychotherapy delivered via telemedicine. Palliative & Supportive Care, 2, 149–155.Google Scholar