Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:56:39.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflections on my Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

T. S. Kuhn
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access

Summary

1. Introduction.

2. Methodology: the role of history and sociology.

3. Normal Science: its nature and functions.

4. Normal Science: its retrieval from history.

5. Irrationality and Theory-Choice.

6. Incommensurability and Paradigms.

INTRODUCTION

It is now four years since Professor Watkins and I exchanged mutually impenetrable views at the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science held at Bedford College, London. Rereading our contributions together with those that have since accreted to them, I am tempted to posit the existence of two Thomas Kuhns. Kuhn is the author of this essay and of an earlier piece in this volume. He also published in 1962 a book called The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, the one which he and Miss Master-man discuss above. Kuhn is the author of another book with the same title. It is the one here cited repeatedly by Sir Karl Popper as well as by Professors Feyerabend, Lakatos, Toulmin, and Watkins. That both books bear the same title cannot be altogether accidental, for the views they present often overlap and are, in any case, expressed in the same words. But their central concerns are, I conclude, usually very different. As reported by his critics (his original has unfortunately been unavailable to me), Kuhn seems on occasion to make points that subvert essential aspects of the position outlined by his namesake.

Lacking the wit to extend this introductory fantasy, I will instead explain why I have embarked upon it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965
, pp. 231 - 278
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, [1969]: “The Electric Current in Early Nineteenth-Century French Physics”, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 1, pp. 61–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavell, [1969]: ‘Must We Mean What We Say?’, in Must We Mean What We Say?, pp. 1-42.Google Scholar
Gombrich, [1960]: Art and Illusion, 1960.Google Scholar
Heilbron, and Kuhn, [1969]: “The Genesis of the Bohr Atom”, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 1, pp. 211–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, [1964]: “Einstein and the Wave-Particle Duality”, The Natural Philosopher, 3, pp. 1-49.Google Scholar
Kuhn, [1961]: ‘The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science’, Isis, 52, pp. 161–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, [1962]: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962. [A second edition, revised and enlarged by a new chapter entitled ‘Postscript 1969’, is to be published as a Phoenix paperback by Chicago University Press in 1970.]Google Scholar
Kuhn, [1964]: ‘A Function for Thought Experiments’, in Cohen, and Taton, (eds.): Melanges Alexandre Koyri, Vol. 2, L'aventure de l'esprtt, pp. 307–34.Google Scholar
Kuhn, [1969]: ‘Comment [on the relations between science and art]’, Comparative Studies in Philosophy and History, 11, pp. 403–12.Google Scholar
Kuhn, [1972]: ‘Second Thoughts on Paradigms’, in Suppe, (ed.): The Structure of Scientific Theory, 1972.Google Scholar
Nida, [1964]: ‘Linguistics and Ethnology in Translation-Problems’, in Hymes, (ed.): Language and Culture in Society, pp. 90–7.Google Scholar
Popper, [1963]: Conjectures and Refutations, 1963.Google Scholar
Quine, [1960]: Word and Object, 1960.Google Scholar
Raman, and Forman, [1969]: ‘Why Was It Schrödinger Who Developed de Broglie's Ideas?’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 1, pp. 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schagrin, [1963]: ‘Resistance to Ohm's Law’, American Journal of Physics, 31, pp. 536–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemer, [1967]: Science and Subjectivity, 1967.Google Scholar
Shapere, [1964]: ‘The Structure of Scientific Revolutions’, Philosophical Review, 73, pp. 383–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, [1966]: ‘Meaning and Scientific Change’, in Colodny, (ed.): Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, 1966, pp. 41-85.Google Scholar
Toulmin, [1967]: ‘The Evolutionary Development of Natural Science’, American Scientist, 55, pp. 456–71.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×