Review ArticleLow-volume disease in endometrial cancer: The role of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells
Introduction
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries, with >55,000 new cases diagnosed every year in the United States (U.S.) [1,2]. EC incidence is increasing: in the U.S. its incidence has increased of >20,000/year cases from 2007 to 2017 [[1], [2], [3]], and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that uterine cancer death rates increased approximately 1.1% per year in the U.S. [4].
Surgery represents the main step of the treatment for EC [4,5]. Hysterectomy (with or without salpingo-oophorectomy) allows tumor removal and can be useful to tailor adjuvant treatments. The role of retroperitoneal staging is still debated [4,5]. In 1988, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) introduced the concept of surgical staging for EC [6]. In 2005, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended surgical staging as an important part of EC management [7]. In 2015, the last practice bulletin published by the committee ACOG in association with Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommended the importance of retroperitoneal staging, reporting that “the initial management of endometrial cancer should include comprehensive surgical staging” [8]. However, randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in EC [9,10]. The cumulative results of these trials showed that the execution of lymphadenectomy increases the risk of developing postoperative morbidity (including lymphoceles, lymphoedema and lymphorrhagia) without significant impacts on oncologic outcomes [9,10]. In the recent years several publications showed that sentinel node mapping is an effective method to identify disease harboring in the lymph nodes, which may allow us to avoid the performance of lymphadenectomy [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]].
The most recent guidelines published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN introduced), with a level IIB evidence, acknowledge the concept of sentinel node mapping, stating that “The role of sentinel node mapping in endometrial carcinoma is under evaluation, sentinel node mapping can be considered for the surgical staging of apparent uterine-confined malignancy when there is no metastasis demonstrated by imaging studies or no obvious extra-uterine disease at exploration” [21]. To date, several retrospective experiences underline that sentinel node mapping upholds oncologic results of standard lymphadenectomy, minimizing surgery-related morbidity [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]]. Furthermore, pathological ultrastaging of sentinel nodes result in a more sensitive and accurate identification of lymphatic disease in comparison to standard lymphadenectomy [[22], [23], [24]]. In fact, the adoption of sentinel node mapping allows to identify low volume disease (i.e., micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells) not detectable via conventional examinations. However, the prognostic value and therapeutic implications related of the detection of low volume disease in EC is still controversial [[25], [26], [27]]. Here, we sought to review the current evidence regarding the importance of pathological ultrastaging, and the role of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells in EC. Further perspective in EC managements are discussed as well.
Section snippets
Pathological ultrastaging
Lymphadenectomy represents the most important staging procedure for the management of endometrial cancer. Nodes' examination allows to identify extra-uterine diffusion, thus permitting to tailor appropriate adjuvant treatments [4,5]. With the increasing adoption of the sentinel node technique, the number of nodes evaluated at pathological examination decreases dramatically. The harvesting of fewer nodes, and the increased importance of accurate assessment to minimize false-negative findings,
The prevalence of low volume disease in endometrial cancer
Accumulating data indicate that the detection of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells is common in patients undergoing sentinel node mapping [[22], [23], [24], [25]]. In 2013, Kim et al., evaluated data 635 patients undergoing sentinel node mapping (with blue dye) for EC. Among those, 508 (80%) had at least one sentinel node detected during surgery [23]. Routine H&E examination showed metastatic disease in about 7% of patients (35 out of 508). Pathological ultrastaging detected an
Sentinel node mapping improves detection of stage IIIC disease in endometrial cancer
The widespread diffusion of sentinel mapping provides a trend in stage migration from stage I to stage IIIC EC. Consistently with data reporting an increased number of patients with low-volume disease in their lymph nodes, we are observing a growing number of patients upstaged at surgery. Retrospective studies comparing two different methods of nodal assessment (sentinel node mapping vs. lymphadenectomy) highlighted this trend [[11], [12], [13], [14]]. A recent study performed in two referral
The role of adjuvant therapy in low volume disease in endometrial cancer
The presence of low volume disease is of uncertain significance in EC. Although medical literature regarding the adoption of technique and tracers for sentinel node mapping is growing sharply, few data regarding treatment options for patients with low volume disease are available. To date, no specific guidelines describe an optimal management of patients with low volume lymphatic disease. The MSKCC group reported a series of 44 stage IIIC EC with low-volume disease [24]. All these patients were
Future perspective
Changing our surgical practice from lymphadenectomy to sentinel node mapping represents an intermediate step. In fact, molecular classification would offer even more accurate risk stratification. Surgical-pathologic staging is the current standard for assessing the need of postoperative treatments but growing data show that molecular characterization offers more precise prognostic data in comparison with conventional histology and other prognostic features currently available [[31], [32]]. The
Conclusions
With the adoption of sentinel node mapping, detection of low-volume disease represents a common occurrence. Prospective studies shows that low-volume disease accounts for >30% of positive nodes in EC patients. The role of low-volume disease is particularly important for patients affected by low-risk endometrial cancer, in which adjuvant treatments are generally omitted. Moreover, micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells are more likely to be diagnosed in the low-risk than in the high-risk
Conflicts of interest
The Authors declare no conflicts of interest. No funding sources supported this investigation.
Author contribution
Conceptualization: GB., Methodology: All authors.; Project administration: FR.; Supervision: AM; FR.; writing - original draft: GB, AD, BP, writing - review & editing: all authors.
References (36)
- et al.
The impact on survival of two different staging strategies in apparent early stage endometrial cancer comparing sentinel lymph nodes mapping algorithm and selective lymphadenectomy: an Italian retrospective analysis of two reference centers
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2017) - et al.
Comparison of a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm and comprehensive lymphadenectomy in the detection of stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma at higher risk for nodal disease
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2017 Dec) - et al.
Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2017) - et al.
A comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy to lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging (FIRES trial): a multicentre, prospective, cohort study
Lancet Oncol.
(2017) - et al.
Near-infrared fluorescence for detection of sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical and uterine cancers (FILM): a randomised, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial
Lancet Oncol.
(Aug 21 2018) - et al.
Sentinel lymph node mapping with pathologic ultrastaging: a valuable tool for assessing nodal metastasis in low-grade endometrial cancer with superficial myoinvasion
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2013) - et al.
Isolated tumor cells identified by sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrialcancer: does adjuvant treatment matter?
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2017) - et al.
Accuracy of robotic sentinel lymph node detection (RSLND) for patients with endometrial cancer (EC)
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2014) - et al.
Markers of the p53 pathway further refine molecular profiling in high-risk endometrial cancer: a TransPORTEC initiative
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2017) - et al.
Dysregulation of miR-181c expression influences recurrence of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma by modulating NOTCH2 expression: an NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2017)