Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 49, August 2015, Pages 343-346
Epilepsy & Behavior

Ketamine in refractory convulsive status epilepticus in children avoids endotracheal intubation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.06.019Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Treatment of refractory convulsive status epilepticus in children

  • Efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine

  • Ketamine as a practical alternative to conventional anesthetics

  • Ketamine use avoids the pitfalls and dangers of endotracheal intubation.

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to report on the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine (KE) in refractory convulsive status epilepticus (RCSE) in children and highlight its advantages with particular reference to avoiding endotracheal intubation.

Methods

Since November 2009, we have used a protocol to treat RCSE including intravenous KE in all patients referred to the Neurology Unit of the Meyer Children's Hospital.

Results

From November 2009 to February 2015, 13 children (7 females; age: 2 months–11 years and 5 months) received KE. Eight patients were treated once, two were treated twice, and the remaining three were treated 3 times during different RCSE episodes, for a total of 19 treatments. Most of the RCSE episodes were generalized (14/19). A malformation of cortical development was the most frequent etiology (4/13 children). Ketamine was administered from a minimum of 22 h to a maximum of 17 days, at doses ranging from 7 to 60 mcg/kg/min, obtaining a resolution of the RCSE in 14/19 episodes. Five patients received KE in lieu of conventional anesthetics, thus, avoiding endotracheal intubation. Ketamine was effective in 4 of them. Suppression-burst pattern was observed after the initial bolus of 3 mg/kg in the majority of the responder RCSE episodes (10/14).

Conclusions

Ketamine is effective in treating RCSE and represents a practical alternative to conventional anesthetics for the treatment of RCSE. Its use avoids the pitfalls and dangers of endotracheal intubation, which is known to worsen RCSE prognosis.

This article is part of a Special Issue entitled “Status Epilepticus”.

Introduction

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening emergency traditionally defined as ‘an acute epileptic condition characterized by continuous seizures for at least 30 min, or by 30 min of intermittent seizures without full recovery of consciousness between seizures’ [1]. Convulsive SE is the most common and harmful form. Based on improved understanding of pathophysiology, there is now consensus that any seizure lasting longer than 5 min should be treated as SE [2].

Status epilepticus lasting longer than 120 min and not responding to first-line (benzodiazepines) and second-line (midazolam at a high dose, phenytoin, and phenobarbital) antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is defined as “refractory” and requires Intensive Care Unit (ICU) treatment [3]. The term “super-refractory” defines SE that continues, or recurs, for 24 h or longer or recurs after withdrawal of anestheticpropofol infusion syndrome therapy [3]. Even with current best practice, neurological sequelae occur in > 50% of children with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (RCSE) [4], [5]. The mortality rate of RCSE ranges between 2.7 and 5.2% and increases up to 5–8% when only data from ICU are taken into account [4], [5]. Refractory convulsive status epilepticus is generally treated with coma induction with high-dose midazolam or thiopental or propofol [6], [7], [8]. However, the high risk of “propofol infusion syndrome” often limits its use in children [9].

Increasing evidence indicates that ketamine (KE), a potent N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist, may be effective in treating RCSE [10]. Compared to conventional anesthetics, KE has neither cardiac nor respiratory depressant properties. Its administration, therefore, does not imply emergent endotracheal intubation, a prognostic factor of increased morbidity and mortality risk in critically ill adults and children [11], [12], [13].

Here, we report our experience using KE in a treatment protocol for children with RCSE, extending our initial series of patients [14] and including those children in whom KE was administered prior to conventional anesthetics.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Since November 2009, our Pediatric Neurology Unit at the Meyer Children's Hospital (Florence, Italy) has used a treatment protocol for RCSE including intravenous KE infusion. S(+)-ketamine (Ketanest S®; Parke-Davis, Freiburg, Germany) was the isoform we used until November 2011. We subsequently started using racemic KE (Ketamina®, Molteni S.p.A., Italy) as the only form of the drug available at our hospital.

Since January 2013, to avoid mechanical ventilation, we have used KE (Ketamina®, Molteni

Results

Between November 2009 and February 2015, 68 consecutive patients were admitted for SE, and 29 of them were transferred to the ICU because of RCSE. Thirteen children (7 female) received intravenous KE. Eight patients were treated once, two were treated twice, and the remaining three were treated 3 times during different RCSE episodes, for a total of 19 treatments (Table 1). Ten RCSE episodes were treated with S(+)-ketamine, while racemic KE was administered in the remaining 9. Patients' ages at

Discussion

Our series (Class IV of evidence), although small, provides further evidence of the efficacy of KE for treating RCSE in children and its safety profile [14]. Status epilepticus resolution was obtained in 14/19 RCSE episodes, and none of the 13 patients experienced serious adverse events. In 2 of the 5 RCSE episodes in which the drug was ineffective, resolution of the SE, even after the failure of conventional anesthetics, was obtained only with surgical treatment. Ketamine was also effective in

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Debora Di Maina, Elisa Nacci, and the team of EEG technicians of the Neurophysiology Laboratory for their technical support, especially concerning the extensive data acquisition and handling.

Conflict of interest

The authors have stated that they had no interests that might be perceived as posing a conflict or bias.

References (20)

  • M. Raspall-Chaure et al.

    Outcome of pediatric convulsive status epilepticus: a systematic review

    Lancet Neurol

    (2006)
  • S. Shibuta et al.

    Ketamine and thiopental sodium: individual and combined neuroprotective effects on cortical cultures exposed to NMDA or nitric oxide

    Br J Anaesth

    (2006)
  • P.F. White et al.

    Comparative pharmacology of the ketamine isomers

    Br J Anaesth

    (1985)
  • Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy

    Proposal for revised clinical and electrographic classification of epileptic seizures

    Epilepsia

    (1981)
  • G.M. Brophy et al.

    Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus

    Neurocrit Care

    (2012)
  • S. Shorvon et al.

    The treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a critical review of available therapies and a clinical treatment protocol

    Brain

    (2011)
  • R.F. Chin et al.

    Incidence, cause and short-term outcome of convulsive status epilepticus in childhood: prospective population-based study

    Lancet

    (2006)
  • N.S. Abend et al.

    Treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Literature review and a proposed protocol

    Pediatr Neurol

    (2008)
  • K. Sofou et al.

    Management of prolonged seizures and status epilepticus in childhood: a systematic review

    J Child Neurol

    (2009)
  • A. Fernandez et al.

    Refractory status epilepticus

    Curr Opin Crit Care

    (2012)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (52)

  • Double antiglutamatergic treatment in patients with status epilepticus: A case series

    2022, Epilepsy and Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    Three out of four patients in the PER group had focal motor SE evolving to bilateral tonic and clonic jerking or tonic seizures, one patient had focal non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Our interest in ketamine arises from the limited data available that showed its superiority in treating SE with high efficacy [8], decreased need for vasopressors, and lower effects on intracranial pressure [9] and avoiding endotracheal intubation in rhetorical cases [10] which is a known poor prognostic factor as mechanical ventilation carries its own risks and complications. We have also shown in a recently published study done at our institution that electrographic findings of beta activity after initiation of ketamine infusion had a statistically and clinically significant predictive value for SE termination [11].

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

View full text