Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 14, Issue 3, March 2009, Pages 459-464
Epilepsy & Behavior

Subjective perception of cognition is related to mood and not performance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.12.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Clinicians monitor cognitive effects of drugs primarily by asking patients to describe their side effects. We examined the relationship of subjective perception of cognition to mood and objective cognitive performance in healthy volunteers and neurological patients.

Methods

Three separate experiments used healthy adults treated with lamotrigine (LTG) and topiramate (TPM), adults with epilepsy on LTG or TPM, and patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Correlations were calculated for change scores on and off drugs in the first two experiments and for the single assessment in Experiment 3.

Results

Across all three experiments, significant correlations were more frequent (χ2 = 259, P  0.000) for mood versus subjective cognitive perception (59%) compared with subjective versus objective cognition (2%) and mood versus objective cognitive performance (2%).

Conclusions

Subjective perception of cognitive effects is related more to mood than objective performance. Clinicians should be aware of this relationship when assessing patients’ cognitive complaints.

Introduction

Practitioners commonly rely on patient self-report of perceived difficulties with memory, attention, concentration, and language when assessing how much a disease state or its treatment might be affecting day-to-day cognitive functioning. Similarly, self-accounts of cognitive performance are often sought from participants in clinical research trials to monitor the safety, efficacy, and side effects of the therapy or drug being studied. Therefore, the extent to which subjective perceptions of cognitive functioning correspond to objective measures of cognitive performance is crucial in determining whether or not self-reports should be considered valid appraisals of neuropsychological status on which diagnostic, treatment, research, or regulatory decisions should be based.

As subjective memory complaints may serve as an indicator of more general cognitive decline [1], the relationship between the subjective perception of memory impairment and objective measures of memory function has been studied extensively, especially in the elderly. In a number of cross-sectional studies of patients without dementia, subjective memory complaints were more highly correlated with measures of mood, especially depression and anxiety, than with objective measures of cognitive performance [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].

Memory is also negatively impacted by epilepsy [8], and patients with epilepsy are apt to report more significant memory disturbances than individuals without epilepsy [9]. Not only are self-reported memory problems by patients with epilepsy weakly correlated with standard memory and neuropsychological measures [10], [11], but patients with subjective memory complaints are more likely to be depressed or anxious than those who report no memory difficulties [10], [12], [13], [14].

Using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-89) to measure subjective perceptions of domains known to affect daily living as well as the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Perrine et al. [15] found that mood significantly correlated with self-reported QOLIE-89 cognition sub-scales for memory, attention/concentration, and language, as well as the overall QOLIE-89 score. They also reported smaller, but significant correlations between the objective neuropsychological tests and the three-self reported QOLIE-89 cognition subscale measures, suggesting that self-reports of memory impairment by persons with epilepsy may be a function of both mood and objective memory functioning. However, the degree to which neuropsychological measures used in these studies reflect the types of memory problems experienced in day-to-day living has been called into question [12], [16]. Elixhauser et al. [17] sought to address this issue by using the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT), a measure explicitly designed to assess everyday memory function, and found similar associations between everyday behavioral memory performance, subjective perception of memory difficulties (QOLIE-89), and self-reported mood (POMS) in patients with epilepsy. Similar to Perrine et al. [15], Elixhauser et al. [17] found a strong association between mood and perceived cognitive function, but a smaller, yet significant, correlation between objective memory performance and perceived cognitive function, regardless of whether neuropsychological tests or measures of everyday performance were used.

Investigations into the validity of self-reports of cognitive function in patients with epilepsy have employed subjects whose seizures were controlled by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A cross-sectional study by Uijl et al. [18] attempted to tease out the contribution of AEDs in the number of subjective complaints that patients with epilepsy conveyed to their physician. Sixty-seven percent of the 173 patients with well-controlled epilepsy reported moderate to severe complaints, most often regarding cognitive dysfunction. The two factors most closely associated with the number and severity of these complaints were high scores on Psychoneuroticism (Symptom Check List-90) and AED polytherapy. These results support the influence of mood on the subjective perception of cognitive impairment, but Uijl et al. [18] did not validate those complaints by objective neuropsychological testing. In fact, there are no studies in the literature that have examined the direct effect of drug treatment on subjective perception of cognitive function and its relationship to both mood and objective performance despite the fact that this is the primary method of assessing cognitive side effects of drugs in clinical settings and in clinical trials for regulatory approval of drugs.

We previously published two double-blind studies that compared the effects of two AEDs on neuropsychological function in healthy volunteers [19] and in patients with epilepsy [20]. In this article, we reanalyzed those data to investigate the relationship of subjective perception, mood, and objective cognitive performance as a function of effects of treatment with AEDs, that is, lamotrigine (LTG) and topiramate (TPM). We hypothesized that changes in perception of cognition across drug/nondrug conditions would be more related to changes in mood than to changes in objective cognitive performance.

As the number of studies that have examined the validity of subjective perception of cognitive performance in patients with neurological diseases remains limited, we also examined the robustness of the relationship between subjective perception of cognition and mood in a new cross-sectional study, which is the first to examine this association in patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

All studies were conducted under the principles of the Helsinki Accords and were approved by the local ethics committees.

Results

Correlation results for the combined experiments and for each individual experiment are summarized in Table 1. The occurrence of significant correlations across all three experiments differed for the comparisons of subjective cognitive perception, mood, and objective cognitive performance (χ2 = 259, P  0.000). Comparisons of mood with subjective cognitive perception were much more likely to exhibit significant correlations. The pattern of correlations was similar for each of the three experimental

Discussion

We have demonstrated in two double-blind, randomized, repeated-measures design studies of healthy volunteers (crossover) and patients with epilepsy (parallel group) that the subjective perception of AED cognitive effects is more related to mood than objective neuropsychological performance. Similar to prior cross-sectional studies in patients with epilepsy [15], [17], we have also demonstrated the same phenomenon in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Self-report of cognitive impairment can be

Contributors

All investigators participated in the preparation of the article after the initial draft was prepared by the corresponding author.

Role of the funding source

Data from prior studies funded by GlaxoSmithKline and the INFORM PD Database, National Parkinson Foundation of Excellence, were used.

Conflict of interest statement

J.M. Miller and R.P. Kustra are employees of GlaxoSmithKline and hold equity in the company. K.J. Meador and M.A. Werz have received grants in excess of $10,000 from GlaxoSmithKline separate from the present study grant. M.A. Werz, and M.R. Schoenberg have received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline. Remaining authors report no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The following people performed statistical analyses: Experiment 1 (healthy volunteers)—co-author V.J. Vahle while at Washington University, St. Louis; Experiment 2 (patients with epilepsy)—A.E. Hammer, Biomedical Data Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline; Experiment 3 (Parkinson’s disease)—co-author A. Roy while at the University of Florida. This work was also supported by the Center of Excellence grant from the National Parkinson Foundation and the UF INFORM-PD database. Though the actual research

References (41)

  • R.D. Nebes et al.

    Persistence of cognitive impairment in geriatric patients following antidepressant treatment: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with nortriptyline and paroxetine

    J Psychiatr Res

    (2003)
  • S. Jungwirth et al.

    Subjective memory complaints and objective memory impairment in the Vienna-Transdanube aging community

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2004)
  • G.J. Larrabee et al.

    Memory self-ratings and objective test performance in a normal elderly sample

    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol

    (1986)
  • K.I. Bolla et al.

    Memory complaints in older adults: fact or fiction?

    Arch Neurol

    (1991)
  • A.P.J. Barker et al.

    Memory complaints in attendees at a self-referral memory clinic: the role of cognitive factors, affective symptoms and personality

    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • C. Derouesne et al.

    Memory complaints in young and elderly subjects

    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • R. Stewart et al.

    Depression, APOE genotype and subjective memory impairment: a cross-sectional study in an African-Caribbean population

    Psychol Med

    (2001)
  • B.P. Hermann et al.

    Memory and epilepsy: current perspectives

    Clin Nurs Pract Epilepsy

    (1996)
  • P.J. Thompson et al.

    Everyday memory failures in people with epilepsy

    Epilepsia

    (1992)
  • A. Piazzini et al.

    The perception of memory failures in patients with epilepsy

    Eur J Neurol

    (2001)
  • Cited by (94)

    • Factors associated with subjective cognitive function in epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

      2020, Epilepsy Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, impaired objective cognitive function is prevalent in PWE, with the memory domain most often affected (Marino et al., 2009). However, determining the exact influence of objective cognitive function on predicting subjective cognitive function can be difficult, and the literature at present is still greatly varied with regards to the association between the two (Marino et al., 2009; Liik et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2013; Liik et al., 2009; Karkoska et al., 2015; Giovagnoli et al., 1997). Finally, the modifying effect of mood disorders on the relationship between subjective and objective cognitive function has not yet been established.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text