- •
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is increasingly applied to moderate stone burdens, particularly for stones in the lower pole calyces.
- •
CT can be used to obtain percutaneous access when intraoperative fluoroscopic access is considered unsafe.
- •
Supine PCNL is associated with reduced operative times but has not demonstrated an advantage over traditional prone PCNL.
- •
Liberal use of flexible nephroscopy and prone retrograde ureteroscopy can reduce the need for multiple percutaneous accesses.
- •
New
Advances in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Section snippets
Key points
Indications
One of the most important factors in selecting the optimal surgical modality for the patient with nephrolithiasis is stone size because size has been shown to strongly influence stone-free rate, need for secondary procedures, and complication rate for some treatment modalities. Historically, PCNL has been the treatment of choice for the management of large and/or complex stones. Indeed, the American Urologic Association (AUA) Guidelines for the Management of Staghorn Calculi states that
Positioning
PCNL has historically been performed with the patient in a prone position. Retrograde placement of a ureteral catheter before PCNL has traditionally been performed with the patient in the dorsal lithotomy position before repositioning the patient prone. The prone split-leg approach was introduced as a modification to prone positioning to increase efficiency and decrease the number of operative interventions required for patients with both upper and lower tract pathology.25 This approach has
Access
The key to a successful percutaneous procedure is well-placed access into the kidney. The percutaneous puncture can be performed under fluoroscopic, ultrasound, MRI, or CT guidance, and it can be obtained from an antegrade or retrograde approach. In 2003, three-quarters of the practicing urologists in the North Central Section of the AUA who responded to a survey reported feeling comfortable performing PCNL, but only 11% of that group routinely obtained percutaneous access without the
Tract dilation
Historically, a variety of methods have been used to dilate the nephrostomy tract, including metal telescoping Alken dilators, sequential Amplatz dilators, and balloon dilation.84 In general, balloon dilation is thought to be quicker than fascial dilation, which requires numerous passes of metal or plastic dilators. Additionally, the numerous passes that are required during dilation with sequential dilators increase the likelihood of wire dislodgement or perforation of the collecting system,
Lithotripsy devices
Successful and efficient PCNL relies heavily on the effectiveness of the lithotripsy device. Ultrasonic lithotripsy has historically constituted the mainstay of stone fragmentation because it effectively fragments most stones and incorporates an efficient suction device for aspiration of fragments. A disadvantage of ultrasonic lithotripsy is its relative inability to effectively fragment and, therefore clear, hard stones, including those with a significant proportion of cystine, calcium oxalate
Postoperative drainage options
The final surgical decision of PCNL is the need for and type of drainage tube. Historically, a large-bore catheter, such as a 24 F Councill catheter, a reentry Malecot catheter, or a nephroureteral stent, was placed at the end of the procedure and left indwelling for several days to provide drainage and tamponade the nephrostomy tract. The advantages of a large-bore catheter include reliable and efficient drainage, maintenance of the tract for a secondary percutaneous procedure, and prevention
Management of residual fragments
The goal of any surgical stone procedure is complete stone removal. Although the single procedure stone-free rate for PCNL is higher than for SWL or URS for comparable sized stones,4, 9 the likelihood of residual fragments after PCNL for large renal calculi is as high as 67%, using strict CT criteria.110 As such, secondary percutaneous procedures to retrieve residual stones and achieve a stone-free state have been encouraged. Likewise, there has been interest in ways to enhance the
Postprocedure imaging
Postoperative imaging after PCNL is aimed at identifying renal and extrarenal complications, such as pleural violation, colonic, splenic or hepatic injury, or urinary extravasation or hemorrhage, and at assessing stone-free status. One of the more common extrarenal complications is the occurrence of hydrothorax associated with pleural transgression during percutaneous access. Historically, many urologists have routinely obtained a chest radiograph in the postanesthesia care unit after PCNL,
Summary
PCNL was developed in an effort to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with open renal surgery but still represents the most morbid of the minimally invasive surgical modalities for stone removal. However, in recent years, efforts to reduce the morbidity and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the procedure have brought PCNL closer to SWL and URS as the optimal first-line treatment of a variety of renal and ureteral calculi.
References (118)
- et al.
Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations
J Urol
(2005) - et al.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones
Urology
(2011) - et al.
Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis
J Urol
(1994) - et al.
New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy
J Urol
(1996) - et al.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long-term radiographic and clinical outcome
J Urol
(1996) - et al.
Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results
J Urol
(2001) - et al.
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones
Kaohsiung J Med Sci
(2008) - et al.
Decreased stone-free rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for high calcium phosphate composition kidney stones
J Urol
(2008) - et al.
Calcium phosphate content does not affect stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy
J Urol
(2012) - et al.
Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study
J Urol
(2002)
Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy
Urology
Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography
Urology
Outcomes of contemporary percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in morbidly obese patients
J Urol
Impact of body mass index on cost and clinical outcomes after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy
Urology
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy with the patient in a modified supine position
J Urol
Tubeless PCNL with patient in supine position: procedure for all seasons?—with comprehensive technique
Urology
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
Eur Urol
The split-leg modified lateral position for percutaneous renal surgery and optimal retrograde access to the upper urinary tract
Urology
Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urology versus radiology at a single academic institution
J Urol
Renal access by urologist or radiologist for percutaneous nephrolithotomy—is it still an issue?
J Urol
Urologist-acquired renal access for percutaneous renal surgery
Urology
Imaging for percutaneous renal access and management of renal calculi
Urol Clin North Am
Percutaneous management of urolithiasis during pregnancy
J Urol
Donor-gifted allograft urolithiasis: early percutaneous management
Urology
Computerized tomography guided access for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy
J Urol
Retrograde method for percutaneous access to kidney
Urology
Hawkins-Hunter retrograde transcutaneous nephrostomy: a new technique
Urology
Ureteroscopically assisted percutaneous renal access
Urology
The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Eur Urol
Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report
J Urol
Comparative study of percutaneous access for staghorn calculi
Urology
Combined percutaneous and retrograde approach to staghorn calculi with application of the ureteral access sheath to facilitate percutaneous nephrolithotomy
J Urol
Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access
J Urol
Influence of technique of percutaneous tract creation on incidence of renal hemorrhage
J Urol
Failed percutaneous balloon dilation for renal access: incidence and risk factors
Urology
One-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy sheath versus standard two-step technique
Urology
Disintegration of renal and ureteral calculi with ultrasound
Urol Clin North Am
In vitro assessment of a novel dual probe ultrasonic intracorporeal lithotriptor
J Urol
Clinical efficacy of a combination pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotrite
J Urol
Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: complications of premature nephrostomy tube removal
J Urol
Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique
Scand J Urol Nephrol
Guidelines on urolithiasis
Eur Urol
The role of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of medium-sized (1–2 cm) lower-pole renal calculi
Acta Chir Belg
Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy
J Endourol
Impacted upper-ureteral calculi >1 cm: blind access and totally tubeless percutaneous antegrade removal or retrograde approach?
J Endourol
Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi?
J Endourol
Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi
Arch Esp Urol
Preoperative indications for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in 2009
J Endourol
A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography
Eur Urol
Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi
BJU Int
Cited by (38)
New Technologies to Aid in Percutaneous Access
2019, Urologic Clinics of North AmericaPredictive factors of infectious complications in the postoperative of percutaneous nephrolithotomy
2019, Actas Urologicas EspanolasImaging in Urology
2018, Imaging in UrologySmall-calibre percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SC-PCNL). Therapeutic decision algorithm
2017, Actas Urologicas EspanolasRetrograde flexible nephrolithotomy in the management of large lithiasic masses as an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy
2016, Urologia ColombianaCitation Excerpt :The annual doses, according to this study, are admissible but very variable depending on the complexity and duration of each procedure. For this reason, several studies with ultrasound-guided access have been conducted, and all reached the conclusion that it has satisfactory results with few complications for the patient and less radiation exposure for the surgeon.6 For the tract dilation, a variety of methods with dilators have historically been used, such as Alken (metallic), Amplatz (plastic), and dilation with a balloon.
Contemporary Trends in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the United States: 1998-2011
2016, UrologyCitation Excerpt :PCNL offers a more definitive surgical treatment and higher stone-free rate compared with other treatment modalities. PCNL with antegrade ureteroscopy has a higher stone-free rate than retrograde ureterolithotripsy (95% vs 80%) for proximal ureteral stones.5 Compared with shock wave lithotripsy, PCNL has a superior stone-free rate (85% vs 33%) for renal stones and requires fewer secondary procedures.5