Original Article
Hemostasis in Liver Disease: Implications of New Concepts for Perioperative Management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2014.03.002Get rights and content

Abstract

The hemostatic profile of patients with liver diseases is frequently profoundly different from that of healthy individuals. These complex alterations lead to abnormal results from routine laboratory tests, but because of the nature of these assays, they fail to accurately represent the patient’s hemostatic state. Nevertheless, based on abnormal laboratory coagulation values, it has long been assumed that patients with liver disease have a natural bleeding tendency and are protected from thrombosis. This assumption is false; the average patient with liver disease is actually in a state of “rebalanced hemostasis” that can relatively easily be tipped toward both bleeding and thrombosis. The new paradigm of rebalanced hemostasis has strong implications for the clinic, which are presented in this review. There is no evidence that prophylactic transfusion of plasma helps to prevent procedure-related bleeding. In addition, the presence of independent risk factors such as poor kidney status or infections should be carefully assessed before invasive procedures. Furthermore, central venous pressure plays an important role in the risk of bleeding in patients with liver diseases, so during procedures, a restrictive infusion policy should be applied. Finally, thrombosis prophylaxis should not be withheld from patients with cirrhosis or acute liver failure, and clinicians should be alert to the possibility of thrombosis occurring in these patients.

Section snippets

The Hemostatic Profile of Patients With Liver Disease

The liver plays a central role in hemostasis as it synthesizes nearly all circulating coagulation factors and inhibitors, as well as some of the components of the fibrinolytic system. In addition, the liver synthesizes thrombopoeitin, which is a hormone essential for stimulation of platelet production from megakaryocytes in the bone marrow. Therefore, liver diseases (whether acute or chronic) frequently are associated with complex alterations of the hemostatic system. The typical hemostatic

Rebalanced Hemostasis

The classical interpretation of the hemostatic profile in patients with liver disease was that these patients have a bleeding tendency. This was believed to be supported by the abnormal laboratory coagulation test results and the observation that spontaneous bleeding occurs frequently in this group of patients. Furthermore, the fact that liver transplant recipients frequently required massive amounts of blood products during the procedure was also considered evidence of an existing bleeding

The Limitations of PT and APTT and the Potential of Thrombin Generation Assays

The PT has been developed as a tool to diagnose defects or deficiencies in individual procoagulant proteins and to evaluate patients using vitamin K antagonist therapy [26]. However, the PT has been adopted as a general indicator of coagulation in a broad range of patients. Because of the nature of the assays, the PT and APTT cannot predict the risk of bleeding in patients with complex hemostatic alterations such as observed in liver disease [26], [29], [30], [31], [32]. The main reason for

Bleeding Does Occur Frequently But Is Mostly of Hemodynamic Origin

Bleeding from esophageal varices occurs in 25% to 35% of patients with cirrhosis and accounts for 80% to 90% of bleeding episodes in these patients [42]. It has now been widely accepted that the presence and rupture of varices is a consequence of portal hypertension and local vascular abnormalities with a (at most) minor role for hemostasis [43]. It has been shown that central venous pressure (CVP) and the splanchnic venous pressure are key factors in the hemostatic balance during liver surgery

Thrombosis Occurs Frequently and Might Be Underreported

As mentioned before, it has long been incorrectly assumed that patients with liver disease are auto-anticoagulated and therefore protected against thrombotic complications [25], [56], [57]. However, portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis that is encountered in 8% to 26% of patients who are candidate for liver transplantation [58], [59], [60], [61] as compared with a lifetime cumulative incidence of 1% in the general population [62]. The reduced portal

Blood Transfusion Is Potentially Harmful and May Not Help in Preventing Bleeding

Blood (product) transfusion is associated with the risk of adverse effects and may be a risk factor for increased mortality [73], [74], [75], [76], [77]. A recent randomized controlled trial showed that the use of a restrictive RBC transfusion policy in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (a common complication of cirrhosis) improves survival and reduces rebleeding risk, by mechanisms related to decreased administration of volume as well as direct adverse effects of RBCs [78].

Treatment Guidelines

The narrative outlined to this point largely originates from the field of liver transplantation, in which it is in many centers a common practice not to administer any blood products prior to or during the procedure unless active bleeding occurs [2], [28], [39], [55], [76], [87], [88]. It is reasonable to assume that this restrictive transfusion policy is also valid for smaller invasive procedures performed on patients with liver disease. Surprisingly, prophylactic transfusions are frequently

Watchful Waiting

Given the aforementioned considerations, we believe that a policy of watchful waiting is most likely superior to preventive correction of laboratory tests, as evidenced by the experience in liver transplantation, although admittedly both strategies have not yet been compared in randomized studies with clinically relevant end points. Because the laboratory testing available at this time cannot predict the risk of bleeding, the best option is to treat only those patients with significant

Prevention and Treatment of Thrombosis

Because liver disease does not protect against thrombosis, thrombosis prevention schemes related to immobilization or invasive procedures should not be withheld from these patients [106]. Although there is accumulating experience with the use of LMWH, the use of these drugs is complicated because of serious dosing and monitoring [107] issues as a result of the abnormal hemostatic profile in patients with liver disease [108], [109]. Specifically, the anticoagulant potency of LMWH appears to be

Conclusion

It has been well established that the average patient with liver failure is in hemostatic balance and may experience both bleeding and thrombotic events. The platelet count, PT, and APTT are poor predictors of bleeding risk and the prophylactic correction of these parameters with platelet concentrates or plasma does not reduce bleeding. Furthermore, the use of blood products has severe adverse effects and may cause bleeding by increasing volume load.

These insights should be put to practice in

References (115)

  • T. Lisman et al.

    Hemostasis and thrombosis in patients with liver disease: the ups and downs

    J Hepatol

    (2010)
  • S. Munoz et al.

    Coagulopathy of acute liver failure

    Clin Liver Dis

    (2009)
  • T. Lisman et al.

    Rebalanced hemostasis in patients with liver disease: evidence and clinical consequences

    Blood

    (2010)
  • G.R. Coêlho et al.

    Single-center transfusion rate for 555 consecutive liver transplantations: impact of two eras

    Transplant Proc

    (2013)
  • A. Tripodi et al.

    Abnormalities of hemostasis in chronic liver disease: reappraisal of their clinical significance and need for clinical and laboratory research

    J Hepatol

    (2007)
  • R.T. Stravitz et al.

    Minimal effects of acute liver injury/acute liver failure on hemostasis as assessed by thromboelastography

    J Hepatol

    (2012)
  • V. Smyrniotis et al.

    The role of central venous pressure and type of vascular control in blood loss during major liver resections

    Am J Surg

    (2004)
  • S. Pavord et al.

    Bleeding and thrombotic complications of kidney disease

    Blood Rev

    (2011)
  • M. Borzio et al.

    Bacterial infection in patients with advanced cirrhosis: a multicentre prospective study

    Dig Liver Dis

    (2001)
  • A. Tripodi et al.

    Hypercoagulability in cirrhosis: causes and consequences

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2011)
  • Q.M. Anstee et al.

    Coagulation status modulates murine hepatic fibrogenesis: implications for the development of novel therapies

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2008)
  • E. Vamvakas et al.

    Transfusion-related mortality: the ongoing risks of allogeneic blood transfusion and the available strategies for their prevention

    Blood

    (2009)
  • P. Toy et al.

    Transfusion-related acute lung injury: incidence and risk factors

    Blood

    (2012)
  • H. Alter et al.

    The hazards of blood transfusion in historical perspective

    Blood

    (2008)
  • S.J. Stanworth et al.

    Evidence for indications of fresh frozen plasma

    Transfus Clin Biol

    (2007)
  • A. Tinmouth

    Evidence for a rationale use of frozen plasma for the treatment and prevention of bleeding

    Transf Apheres Sci

    (2012)
  • I. Patel et al.

    Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2012)
  • R. Schroeder et al.

    Intraoperative fluid management during orthotopic liver transplantation

    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (2004)
  • M. Noris et al.

    Uremic bleeding: closing the circle after 30 years of controversies?

    Blood

    (1999)
  • T. Lisman et al.

    Anemia as a potential contributor to bleeding in patients with liver disease—neglected but not forgotten

    J Hepatol

    (2011)
  • K.C. Sihler et al.

    Complications of massive transfusion

    Chest

    (2010)
  • B. Blauhut

    Indications for prothrombin complex concentrates in massive transfusions

    Thromb Res

    (1999)
  • L. Massicotte et al.

    Transfusion rate for 500 consecutive liver transplantations: experience of one liver transplantation center

    Transplantation

    (2012)
  • W. Dzik

    Predicting hemorrhage using preoperative coagulation screening assays

    Curr Hematol Rep

    (2004)
  • W. Dzik et al.

    Why do physicians request fresh frozen plasma?

    Transfusion

    (2004)
  • T. Lisman et al.

    Hemostatic alterations in liver disease: a review on pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and treatment

    Dig Surg

    (2007)
  • S.H. Caldwell et al.

    Coagulation disorders and hemostasis in liver disease: pathophysiology and critical assessment of current management

    Hepatology

    (2006)
  • T. Lisman et al.

    Elevated levels of von Willebrand factor in cirrhosis support platelet adhesion despite reduced functional capacity

    Hepatology

    (2006)
  • M. Hollestelle et al.

    Factor VIII expression in liver disease

    J Thromb Haemost

    (2004)
  • R.H. Aster

    Pooling of platelets in the spleen: role in the pathogenesis of “hypersplenic” thrombocytopenia

    J Clin Invest

    (1966)
  • G. Vernon et al.

    Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    (2011)
  • Z. Younossi et al.

    Changes in the prevalence of the most common causes of chronic liver diseases in the United States from 1988 to 2008

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2011)
  • A. Kargili et al.

    Hemostatic alterations in fatty liver disease

    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis

    (2010)
  • S. Munoz et al.

    The coagulopathy of acute liver failure and implications for intracranial pressure monitoring

    Neurocrit Care

    (2008)
  • P. Northup et al.

    Coagulopathy does not fully protect hospitalized cirrhosis patients from peripheral venous thromboembolism

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • S. Caldwell et al.

    The prothrombin time-derived international normalized ratio: great for warfarin, fair for prognosis and bad for liver-bleeding risk

    Liver Int

    (2008)
  • J. Segal et al.

    Paucity of studies to support that abnormal coagulation test results predict bleeding in the setting of invasive procedures: an evidence-based review

    Transfusion

    (2005)
  • L. Massicotte et al.

    MELD score and blood product requirements during liver transplantation: no link

    Transplantation

    (2009)
  • L. Massicotte et al.

    Coagulation defects do not predict blood product requirements during liver transplantation

    Transplantation

    (2008)
  • A. Tripodi et al.

    Evidence of normal thrombin generation in cirrhosis despite abnormal conventional coagulation tests

    Hepatology

    (2005)
  • Cited by (104)

    • Cirrhosis and the surgical patient

      2023, Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: This work was not funded.

    Conflicts: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

    View full text