Review
The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.006Get rights and content

We present an overview of current literature addressing cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders. Based on recent studies at multiple sites, using diverse methods and participants of different autism subtypes, ages and cognitive levels, no consistent evidence for cognitive flexibility deficits was found. Researchers and clinicians assume that inflexible everyday behaviors in autism are directly related to cognitive flexibility deficits as assessed by clinical and experimental measures. However, there is a large gap between the day-to-day behavioral flexibility and that measured with these cognitive flexibility tasks. To advance the field, experimental measures must evolve to reflect mechanistic models of flexibility deficits. Moreover, ecologically valid measures are required to be able to resolve the paradox between cognitive and behavioral inflexibility.

Section snippets

Focus of this review

Both clinicians and researchers widely believe that cognitive flexibility deficits are pathognomonic of autism spectrum disorders. Here, we question this belief. We address why this is important, why cognitive flexibility deficits are considered central to autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and why we are skeptical.

Why is this important?

Autism spectrum disorders, including autistic disorder, high functioning autism (HFA), Asperger syndrome and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDDNOS), are neurodevelopmental disorders involving social and communication impairments combined with restricted, stereotypical patterns of behavior and interests 1, 2. We employ the term autism to refer collectively to these disorders. Clinical observation indicates that pervasive cognitive and behavioral rigidity across

Why are such cognitive flexibility deficits considered central to autism?

First, the cognitive flexibility construct seems to map easily onto the observed behavior (Table 1). Parents and clinicians alike will see inflexibility as one of the most troubling, consistent and difficult-to-intervene characteristics of the disorder. Second, many cognitive flexibility autism studies using clinical neuropsychological measures indicate that there are cognitive flexibility deficits. However, we question that failure on these measures is indeed because of cognitive inflexibility

Why the skepticism?

First, as described in the previous paragraph, there are serious issues with the WCST that makes it impossible to conclude that failure is indeed because of cognitive inflexibility, although failure might be because of generalized performance deficits (i.e. executive functioning deficits). Second, as described later, studies in autism using experimental cognitive psychology measures that are developed to examine the function of specific cognitive systems, often do not report cognitive

Conclusions and future directions

This qualitative literature overview shows that the findings regarding cognitive flexibility deficits in individuals with autism as assessed by either clinical neuropsychology (other than the WCST) or experimental cognitive psychology paradigms, are rather inconsistent, despite exhibiting behavioral inflexibility in many respects. Besides the differences in the applied cognitive flexibility tasks among the studies, there is considerable heterogeneity in age, cognitive level and autism subtype

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Joel Nigg for his helpful suggestions, Mark Broeders for assistance with the literature review, and we thank the Center for Mind and Brain and the M.I.N.D. Institute of University of California Davis as H.M.G wrote this review during her sabbatical at these institutes.

References (72)

  • K.M. Shafritz

    The neural circuitry mediating shifts in behavioral response and cognitive set in autism

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • B.J. Casey

    Evidence for a mechanistic model of cognitive control

    Clin. Neurosci. Res.

    (2001)
  • S.M. Ravizza et al.

    Shifting set about task switching: behavioral and neural evidence for distinct forms of cognitive flexibility

    Neuropsychologia

    (2008)
  • R.K. Kana

    Inhibitory control in high-functioning Autism: decreased activation and underconnectivity in inhibition networks

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • B.A. Corbett

    Cortisol circadian rhythms and response to stress in children with autism

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2006)
  • C.M. McCormick

    Individual differences in cortisol levels and performance on a test of executive function in men and women

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2007)
  • K.R. Ridderinkhof

    Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning

    Brain Cogn.

    (2004)
  • A. Miyake

    The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis

    Cognit. Psychol.

    (2000)
  • S. Georgiades

    Structure of the autism symptom phenotype: a proposed multidimensional model

    J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • S. Konishi

    Differential superior prefrontal activity on initial versus subsequent shifts in naive subjects

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • K.K. Zakzanis

    An fMR1 study of the trail making test

    Neuropsychologia

    (2005)
  • E.G. Willcutt

    Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • L.E. Arnold

    Atomoxetine for hyperactivity in autism spectrum disorders: placebo-controlled crossover pilot trial

    J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., TR) American...
  • F.R. Volkmar

    Autism and pervasive developmental disorders

    J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip.

    (2004)
  • B.F. Pennington et al.

    Executive functions and developmental psychopathology

    J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip.

    (1996)
  • R.M. Joseph et al.

    The relationship of theory of mind and executive functions to symptom type and severity in children with autism

    Dev. Psychopathol.

    (2004)
  • R.J. Landa et al.

    Language, social, and executive functions in high functioning Autism: a continuum of performance

    J. Autism Dev. Disord.

    (2005)
  • B.R. Lopez

    Examining the relationship between executive functions and restricted, repetitive symptoms of Autistic disorder

    J. Autism Dev. Disord.

    (2005)
  • M. South

    The relationship between executive functions, central coherence, and repetitive behavior in the high-functioning autism spectrum

    Autism

    (2007)
  • E.G. Willcutt

    Recent developments in neuropsychological models of childhood psychiatric disorders

    Adv. Biol. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • F.Z. Ambery

    Differences in neuroanatomy and their relationship to cognitive functioning in people with Asperger's syndrome and high functioning autism

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • H.M. Geurts

    How specific are executive functioning deficits in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and autism?

    J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discip.

    (2004)
  • G. Goldstein

    Attentional processes in autism

    J. Autism Dev. Disord.

    (2001)
  • N.J. Minshew

    Abstract reasoning in autism: a dissociation between concept formation and concept identification

    Neuropsychology

    (2002)
  • E. Pellicano

    Multiple cognitive capabilities/deficits in children with an autism spectrum disorder: “Weak” central coherence and its relationship to theory of mind and executive control

    Dev. Psychopathol.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (352)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text