NeoplasmThe selection of the optimal therapeutic strategy for petroclival meningiomas☆
Introduction
During the past decades, major advances have been made in microsurgical techniques for skull base surgery. However, petroclival meningiomas remain formidable challenges for most neurosurgeons because of their proximity to critical neural and vascular structures and because of their large size at diagnosis. Although surgical mortality has been reduced from more than 50% before 1970 to less than 10% in recent operations, the rate of permanent postoperative complications is reported to be as high as 50% [2], [5], [6], [7], [10], [14]. The ideal goal of total resection with no surgical morbidity is difficult to achieve consistently for this tumor. Neurosurgeons agonize in trying to balance grave morbidity after aggressive resection against the uncertain natural history for any residual tumor. Although the natural history for petroclival meningiomas is variable, most are benign and grow slowly [8], [19]. Selecting an optimal therapeutic strategy for each patient involves various considerations, including prognostic factors, application of novel tools such as radiosurgery, and the consequences for the quality of life of the patient. The decision depends on answers to the following questions. First, is radical resection always the best option for ensuring an acceptable quality of life for the patient? Second, can we predict the tumor progression? Third, what options other than surgery are there? To find answers to these questions, we have reviewed our broad experience with the management of petroclival meningiomas, and from this review, we propose guidelines for the management of this disease.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
Meningiomas of petroclival area are defined as the mass that emanates at or medial to the skull base foramina of cranial nerves V through XI and encompasses the upper two-thirds of the clivus. A total of 75 patients with petroclival meningiomas were studied during the period from 1986 to 2000. Careful retrospective reviews of their clinical records and radiological analyses were done. The mean age was 46.2 years (15-74 years) and the male to female ratio was 1:4. Only patients with at least 4
Outcomes for patients initially treated with microsurgery
Thirty-eight (77.6%) patients exhibited no recurrence or regrowth after microsurgery during the follow-up period, whereas the other 11 (22.4%) patients eventually showed tumor progression. Patients with tumor progression all had incomplete resections. The median time to progression was 36 months. According to Kaplan-Meier survival plots, the 5-year progression-free rate was 75% and median progression-free period was 64 months (Fig. 1). The most common histological identification was the
Is radical resection always the best option for preserving high quality of life in the patient?
The surgical management of petroclival meningiomas has frustrated neurosurgeons for many years, and its conquest has not yet been achieved. The operative outcomes for petroclival meningiomas previously reported are summarized in Table 5 [2], [5], [7], [10], [12], [14], [16], [21]. Even in the expert hands of neurosurgeons, the functional outcome after surgery is disappointing. This may be due to the complex anatomical relationships of significant neurovascular structures as well as to the
Conclusions
Because the growth rate of petroclival meningioma is low and good functional status can be preserved, incomplete resection should be considered. Adjuvant treatment, especially radiosurgery, after resection can be used to control the residual tumor. Radiosurgery may also be the preferred primary treatment for asymptomatic patients with small tumors. However, more aggressive treatment is needed for young patients or patients with short symptom durations.
References (22)
- et al.
Posterior fossa meningiomas: surgical experience in 161 cases
Surg Neurol
(2001) - et al.
The meningioma controversy: postoperative radiation therapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1988) - et al.
Petroclival meningiomas: predictive parameters for transpetrosal approaches
Neurosurgery
(2000) - et al.
Petrosal approach for petroclival meningiomas
Neurosurgery
(1988) - et al.
The long-term side effects of radiation therapy for benign brain tumors in adults
J Neurosurg
(1990) - et al.
Radiation therapy in the treatment of partially resected meningiomas
Neurosurgery
(1987) - et al.
Microsurgical removal of petroclival meningiomas: a report of 33 patients
Neurosurgery
(1992) - et al.
Clivus meningiomas
Neurology
(1966) - et al.
Petroclival meningiomas: surgical experience in 109 cases
J Neurosurg
(1996) - et al.
Long-term outcome and growth rate of subtotally resected petroclival meningiomas: experience with 38 cases
Neurosurgery
(2000)
The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer
Cited by (72)
Natural history of intracranial meningiomas
2020, Handbook of Clinical NeurologyCitation Excerpt :A significant portion of patients presenting with preoperative cranial neuropathies will experience improvement after surgical resection. In particular, authors have noted preoperative lower cranial nerve palsies to have the highest likelihood for recovery, while those presenting with hearing loss had the least chance of recovery (Park et al., 2006). As many as 90% of those presenting with preoperative hemiparesis and 75%–77% presenting with cerebellar symptoms experienced improvement after resection (Abdel Aziz et al., 2000; Park et al., 2006).
Outcomes of Endonasal and Lateral Approaches to Petroclival Meningiomas
2017, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :Despite the development of complex and sophisticated surgical approaches, gross total resection (GTR) is not always feasible and surgical morbidity remains a substantial risk.1,2 Given the high rates of postoperative morbidity regardless of the surgical approach, clinical status usually deteriorates after surgery with return to baseline or improvement in the long-term.3-5 The indolent growth of petroclival meningiomas and the excellent results of radiosurgery for controlling residual tumor with minimal morbidity have prompted surgeons to be less aggressive in resecting invasive petroclival meningiomas and to accept a subtotal resection of high-risk cases.2,4,6-14
Petroclival meningiomas: Remaining controversies in light of minimally invasive approaches
2017, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
- ☆
This work was partially supported by grants from the Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, and The Korea Brain and Spinal Cord Research Foundation.