Elsevier

The Surgeon

Volume 9, Issue 4, August 2011, Pages 211-217
The Surgeon

Review
Postoperative pancreatic fistula

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2010.10.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Postoperative pancreatic fistula is an important complication after pancreatic resection. The frequency of its incidence varies between 3% after pancreatic head resections and up to 30% following distal pancreatectomy. In recent years, the international definition of pancreatic fistula has been standardised according to the approach of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). Consequently, results from different studies have become comparable and the historically reported fistula rates can be evaluated more critically.

The present review summarises the currently available data on incidence, risk factors, fistula-associated complications and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Section snippets

Background

Pancreatic operations are technically challenging surgical procedures that require a high level of experience and standards with regard to resection and reconstruction. While these procedures were associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in the past, pancreatic surgery has significantly changed during the last two decades with regard to technical aspects as well as perioperative care.1, 2, 3, 4 Standardised resections are well-established and can be carried out today with low

Definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula

Pancreatic fistulae have been described by various authors using non-standardised definitions in the past.6, 13, 15, 16 In general, the leakage of enzyme-containing fluid from the pancreatic tissue or duct, of any origin and cause, is regarded as a pancreatic fistula. With regard to the postoperative situation, a leakage from the pancreatic stump or the anastomosis can frequently be observed in the very early phase after a resection. Therefore, it is necessary to further clarify the fistula

Procedure-specific incidence and risk factors for fistula development

The occurrence of a postoperative leakage of pancreatic juice is highly dependent on the performed resection and the underlying pancreatic pathology.6 Especially, soft pancreatic tissue texture without pre-existing fibrosis is regarded as a risk factor for fistula development.

Prevention of postoperative fistula

The use of octreotide and its analogues to prevent postoperative fistula is an approach which has been used since the 1990s.51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 Despite twenty years of clinical use and performance in numerous studies, a recent Cochrane meta-analysis56 concluded that evidence is still lacking to give clear recommendations or guidelines. While early RCTs favoured the use of octreotide and showed a 50% reduction of fistula rates51, 52, 53 these findings were not confirmed in later trials.54, 55

Fistula-associated complications

Once a pancreatic fistula is evident in the postoperative course, prevention of consecutive complications is essential. Commonly-observed complications are mainly caused by undrained pancreatic fluid and superinfection of fluid collections. As pancreatic fluid is an enzymatically active and aggressive substance, arrosional complications can affect the surrounding tissue, namely the intestinal, bile duct or vessel walls. This can lead to a leakage of increasing size at the pancreatic anastomosis

Management of pancreatic fistula

The management of postoperative fistula remains a therapeutic challenge and underlines the importance of specific surgical, radiological and, if necessary, anaesthesiological ICU care knowledge. As every fistula is a potentially life-threatening complication for the patient, early detection and careful management is of the highest priority to avoid consequent complications. Depending on the clinical symptomology and the condition of the patient, fistula management ranges from persisting

References (78)

  • L.J. Harris et al.

    Optimal technical management of stump closure following distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective review of 215 cases

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2010)
  • J.Y. Mabrut et al.

    (HBPS) of the Royal Belgian Society of surgery; Belgian group for Endoscopic surgery (BGES); Club Coelio. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients

    Surgery

    (2005)
  • C. Bassi

    Middle segment pancreatectomy: a useful tool in the management of pancreatic neoplasms

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2007)
  • S.C. Pitt et al.

    Small pancreatic and periampullary neuroendocrine tumors: resect or enucleate?

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2009)
  • H. Shinchi et al.

    The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2006)
  • S.E. Lee et al.

    Prospective randomized pilot trial comparing closed suction drainage and gravity drainage of the pancreatic duct in pancreaticojejunostomy

    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg

    (2009)
  • J.M. Winter et al.

    Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2006)
  • T.A. Sohn et al.

    Pancreaticoduodenectomy: role of interventional radiologists in managing patients and complications

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2003)
  • J.J. Cullen et al.

    Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management

    Am J Surg

    (1994)
  • T.A. Baker et al.

    Role of interventional radiology in the management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy

    Am J Surg

    (2008)
  • M.G. Ridgeway et al.

    Surgical management and treatment of pancreatic fistulas

    Surg Clin North Am

    (1996)
  • M.W. Büchler et al.

    Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy

    Arch Surg

    (2003)
  • J.H. Balcom et al.

    Ten year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients and decreasing length of hospitalization

    Arch Surg

    (2001)
  • J.D. Cunningham et al.

    Complications requiring reoperation following pancreatectomy

    Int J Pancreatol

    (1998)
  • T.R. Donahue et al.

    Pancreatic surgery

    Curr Opin Gastroenterol

    (2010)
  • T. Hackert et al.

    Surgical options in the management of pancreatic cancer

    Minerva Chir

    (2009)
  • M.W. Büchler et al.

    Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection

    Br J Surg

    (2000)
  • C. Bassi et al.

    Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions

    Dig Surg

    (2004)
  • S.V. Shrikhande et al.

    Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: evolving definitions, preventive strategies and modern management

    World J Gastroenterol

    (2008)
  • N. Sato et al.

    Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection

    Arch Surg

    (1998)
  • K.M. Reid-Lombardo et al.

    Pancreatic anastomotic leak study group. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the pancreatic anastomotic leak study group

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2007)
  • C. Bassi et al.

    Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenenctomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients

    Dig Surg

    (2001)
  • F.G. Bartoli et al.

    Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature

    Anticancer Res

    (1991)
  • A. McKay et al.

    Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy

    Br J Surg

    (2006)
  • C. Bassi et al.

    Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study

    Ann Surg

    (2005)
  • Y.M. Yang et al.

    Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy

    World J Gastroenterol

    (2005)
  • M. Schäfer et al.

    Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis

    Ann Surg

    (2002)
  • M.K. Diener et al.

    Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Ann Surg

    (2008)
  • Cited by (112)

    • Hyperamylasemia grade versus drain fluid amylase: which better predicts pancreatectomy outcomes?

      2022, HPB
      Citation Excerpt :

      Subsequently, grade A POPF was removed from the definition due to its lack of clinical relevance and reclassified as a biochemical leak, while grade B and C remained as the entity of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF).3 CR-POPF is a frequent occurrence after pancreatectomy, occurring, on average, following 10%–15% following pancreatoduodenectomy and 15%–20% following distal pancreatectomy.2,4,5 Multiple risk factors have been identified to predict CR-POPF.

    • Effect of wound protectors on surgical site infection in patients undergoing whipple procedure

      2021, HPB
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a wound protector would provide a physical barrier between bacterial entry from contaminated bile to exposed wound edges, there is a feasible mechanism of wound protector defense against bacterial contamination of bile in patients with preoperative biliary stents. Small pancreatic duct size and soft pancreatic texture were also found to be independent predictors of SSI, which may be due to these same factors being associated with increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula, resulting in infected intra-abdominal collections that if not adequately drained, may secondarily infect a wound from fascia to subcutaneous tissue and skin15. Our data confirms the association between pancreatic fistula and superficial or deep SSI but the association did not hold for organ space SSI, which is known to not be a surrogate marker of postoperative pancreatic fistula.25

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text