Elsevier

Pharmacological Research

Volume 64, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages 242-248
Pharmacological Research

Thymidylate synthase expression and genotype have no major impact on the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2011.04.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Background and objectives

Thymidylate synthase (TS) expression levels appear to be related to response to 5-fluorouracil-(5-FU)-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Three polymorphisms have been proposed as modulators of TS expression: a tandemly repeated sequence (2R/3R) in the 5′ UTR, a SNP (G > C) within the 3R allele and a 6 bp deletion in the 3′ UTR.

To evaluate the influence of TS expression and polymorphisms on clinical outcome of 5-FU-treated patients we performed a comprehensive genetic analysis on 63 CRC patients.

Methods

TS expression levels were analyzed in normal and tumor tissues. TS coding sequence and UTR polymorphisms were investigated on DNA from normal tissue. LOH analysis was performed to determine tumor genotype.

Results

A difference in disease-free survival (DFS), although not statistically significant, was observed between high and low mRNA expression levels: patients with low levels showed longer DFS. The 2R2R genotype showed significantly lower expression than the 3R3R and 2R3R genotypes in normal tissue. No other TS polymorphism was associated with mRNA expression or clinical outcome.

Conclusions

The results obtained in this pilot study indicate that the number of 5′ UTR repeats is the major genetic determinant of TS expression. The lack of association with other polymorphisms might be partially explained by the existence of linkage disequilibrium in the TS gene. Our data support the growing evidence that TS control may require multiple mechanisms acting in close coordination with one another and suggest that TS genotyping alone in tumor samples is not sufficient to accurately predict response to 5-FU.

Introduction

More than 50 years after its introduction into clinical practice, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is still a fundamental drug in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and many other tumors, either alone or in combination with other drugs [1], [2]. Several variables associated with genes involved in the 5-FU metabolic pathway have been studied for their potential relationship with clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy. To date the most widely studied molecular marker is thymidylate synthase (TS), the biological target of 5-FU and related drugs. TS is the key enzyme of the de novo synthesis of deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP), that catalyzes the methylation of deoxyuridine monophosphate to dTMP [3], [4], an essential step in DNA synthesis.

The expression level of the TS gene appears to be related to clinical outcome and response to 5-FU chemotherapy and has been suggested as a potential prognostic and/or predictive marker. Johnston et al. [5] first demonstrated a correlation between low TS levels and improved 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in rectal cancer patients receiving 5-FU adjuvant chemotherapy. A meta-analysis by Popat et al. [6] showed that CRC patients with advanced disease treated with TS inhibitors had a significantly better OS if they had low TS expression in primary tumors or metastases, whereas a predictive role of TS expression was not established for the adjuvant setting.

Three different polymorphisms in the TS untranslated regions (UTRs) have been proposed as modulators of TS mRNA transcriptional and translational efficiency. The 5′ UTR contains a variable number of 28 bp tandem repeats (VNTR) [7], [8]. Although up to nine repeats have been described, the vast majority of TS alleles harbor either 2 or 3 repeats, creating genotypes defined as 2R/2R, 2R/3R and 3R/3R, respectively. The 3R alleles present a G > C single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at the 12th position of the second repeat [9]. The two alleles of this SNP are defined as 3RG and 3RC, respectively. The third polymorphism is a 6 bp insertion/deletion at nucleotide 1494 within the 3′ UTR [10]. In addition, a further SNP in the VNTR region, consisting of a C > G substitution in the first repeat of the 2R allele, has recently been described [11].

Many studies have been conducted to investigate whether TS genotypes might explain differences in mRNA expression levels, but the results are heterogeneous and even controversial.

In vitro experiments have shown that the 3R/3R genotype is associated with higher levels of TS gene expression than the 2R/2R genotype [8]. Subsequent experiments on DNA samples from CRC patients provided support to these results, indicating that the 3R sequence has greater transcriptional efficiency than the 2R allele [12], [13]. The influence of the VNTR on TS expression has been ascribed to the presence of a USF family E-box consensus element in repeat units containing the G nucleotide at position 12. The G > C substitution eliminates the USF-1 binding site, thus abolishing the translation enhancer effect of the 3R allele [9]. Each of the first two repeats of the 3RG allele has a G at this position; therefore, 3RG alleles contain two potential USF-1 binding sites, whereas the G is present only in the first repeat of 2R and 3RC alleles, that consequently have a single USF-1 site.

The ins/del polymorphism within the 3′ UTR seems to modulate TS expression by affecting mRNA stability; the 6bpdel allele has been associated with decreased mRNA stability in vitro and lower intratumoral TS expression in vivo [14], [15].

By contrast, other studies did not detect any correlation between TS polymorphisms and mRNA or protein expression levels [16], [17], [18], or even a significantly decreased TS mRNA expression in samples from patients with the 3R/3R genotype [19].

Discrepancies in results among different studies may be due to methodological differences or incomplete analysis leading to partial results. Some groups analyzed TS expression levels by immunohistochemistry (IHC) [14], [15], [20] while others used real time quantitative PCR [12], [21], [22]. In addition, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), that modifies TS genotype in tumor cells, has been reported to affect tumor response and survival and TS expression [21], [23].

In order to take into account all major intrinsic factors potentially involved in the relationship between TS genotype, expression and clinical response to 5-FU, we performed a comprehensive pilot study; this involved investigation of the whole TS coding sequence, 5′ and 3′ UTR polymorphisms and mRNA expression in normal and matching tumor tissues of a series of CRC patients receiving treatment with 5-FU only. We analyzed possible associations between TS genotype and expression as well as those between these experimental data and survival parameters (DFS and OS). Additional associations between TS genotype, expression and clinical/pathological characteristics were explored.

Section snippets

Tissue samples

Primary tumor and corresponding colonic mucosa explants obtained from 63 CRC patients at surgery were frozen in liquid nitrogen until molecular analysis. Normal colonic mucosa was taken at a distance of ∼10 cm from the tumors. Immediately after resection, the tumor sample was divided into equal portions after washing and removal of necrotic tissues. Some specimens were fresh frozen in liquid nitrogen, and one portion was embedded in paraffin to confirm histologically that it was not

Results

Clinical/pathological characteristics of the patients investigated are reported in Table 2. The series was comprised of 32 males and 31 females, with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years (range 23–76). All patients received 5-FU chemotherapy: 52 as adjuvant and 11 as palliation.

Interindividual variation in TS mRNA expression was 25.5 (TS/GAPDH ratios: 0.35–8.93; median value 1.53) and 231.5 fold (TS/GAPDH ratios: 0.04–9.26; median value 1.93) in tumor and normal tissue, respectively (data not

Discussion

In the present study we have extended our previous analysis of the relationship between TS genotype, TS mRNA levels, and response to 5-FU treatment in CRC patients [22]. To this purpose, we investigated expression and genotypes in both normal colonic mucosa and tumor tissue and we analyzed further genetic variables, including the whole TS coding sequence in constitutional DNA, LOH in the TS region, 3′ UTR polymorphisms, and estimate of LD.

Overall, no significant correlations between TS alleles,

Acknowledgements

Supported by a grant from the University of Florence (ex 60%) to MG, a grant from Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universita’ e della Ricerca, Rome (PRIN 2005) to TM, and by contributions of Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze to Fiorgen, MG and EM, of Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Milan to EM and of Gruppo Oncologico Chirurgico Cooperativo Italiano, Florence to EM.

References (49)

  • D.B. Longley et al.

    5-Fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2003)
  • P.V. Danenberg et al.

    Structures of reversible and irreversible complexes of thymidylate synthetase and fluorinated pyrimidine nucleotides

    Biochemistry

    (1974)
  • D.V. Santi et al.

    Mechanism of interaction of thymidylate synthetase with 5-fluorodeoxyuridylate

    Biochemistry

    (1974)
  • P.G. Johnston et al.

    The role of thymidylate synthase expression in prognosis and outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (1994)
  • S. Popat et al.

    Thymidylate synthase expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • S. Kaneda et al.

    Role in translation of a triple tandemly repeated sequence in the 5’-untranslated region of human thymidylate synthase mRNA

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (1987)
  • N. Horie et al.

    Functional analysis and DNA polymorphism of the tandemly repeated sequences in the 5’-terminal regulatory region of the human gene for thymidylate synthase

    Cell Struct Funct

    (1995)
  • M.V. Mandola et al.

    A novel single nucleotide polymorphism within the 5’ tandem repeat polymorphism of the thymidylate synthase gene abolishes USF-1 binding and alters transcriptional activity

    Cancer Res

    (2003)
  • C.M. Ulrich et al.

    Searching expressed sequence tag databases: discovery and confirmation of a common polymorphism in the thymidylate synthase gene

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2000)
  • L.F. Lincz et al.

    Identification of a novel single nucleotide polymorphism in the first tandem repeat sequence of the thymidylate synthase 2R allele

    Int J Cancer

    (2007)
  • S.T. Pullarkat et al.

    Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism determines response and toxicity of 5-FU chemotherapy

    Pharmacogenomics J

    (2001)
  • K. Kawakami et al.

    Different lengths of a polymorphic repeat sequence in the thymidylate synthase gene affect translational efficiency but not its gene expression

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2001)
  • M.V. Mandola et al.

    A 6 bp polymorphism in the thymidylate synthase gene causes message instability and is associated with decreased intratumoral TS mRNA levels

    Pharmacogenetics

    (2004)
  • E. Dotor et al.

    Tumor thymidylate synthase 1494del6 genotype as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer patients receiving fluorouracil-based adjuvant treatment

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Predictive “omic” biomarkers of drug response: Colorectal cancer as a model

      2022, Antiangiogenic Drugs as Chemosensitizers in Cancer Therapy: volume 18
    • How folate metabolism affects colorectal cancer development and treatment; a story of heterogeneity and pleiotropy

      2015, Cancer Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      However conclusions about the relationship between genotype and benefit, or toxicity, have been conflicting. There is considerable inter-study variability in the range of markers considered individually (see Table 1 for a selection of the markers analysed in CRC pharmacogenetic and disease association studies) and few studies considered signatures of alternative markers, additive effects or epistasis [2,3,56,62]. There is also heterogeneity in the therapeutic regime of participants; clinical phenotypes considered; and duration of follow up.

    • Epigenetics and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer: An opportunity for treatment tailoring and novel therapeutic strategies

      2011, Drug Resistance Updates
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has also been shown that astrocyte elevated gene-1 (AEG-1), known to augment invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis, directly contributes to 5-FU resistance, since it induces the expression of LSF (late SV40 factor), a transcription factor that regulates the expression of TS (Yoo et al., 2009). Many studies have been conducted to investigate whether TYMS polymorphisms (Kaneda et al., 1987; Horie et al., 1995; Ulrich et al., 2000; Mandola et al., 2003; Lincz et al., 2007) might also explain differences in mRNA expression levels, but the results are heterogeneous and even controversial, especially in studies on samples from colorectal cancer patients (Pullarkat et al., 2001; Kawakami et al., 2001; Dotor et al., 2006; Fernández-Contreras et al., 2006; Gosens et al., 2008; Vignoli et al., 2011). In addition, resistance to 5-FU has been associated with the production of altered structural forms of TS which has a reduced affinity for FdUMP in tumor cell culture models including human colon tumor cell line (HCT 116) as a consequence of TYMS gene mutations (Berger et al., 1988; Barbour et al., 1990; Tong et al., 1998; Landis and Loeb, 1998).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text