Patients’ use of the Internet for pain-related medical information

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Patients increasingly use the Internet for medical information. For doctor–patient communication it is important to gain insight into the use and impact of medical Internet searches of patients. This study aims to evaluate patients’ use of the Internet for information about their pain problem.

Methods

A self-administered survey on pain-related Internet use was sent to 200 new patients attending a university pain center. The response rate was 61%.

Results

Half of all respondents used the Internet for medical information and a smaller percentage (39%) searched for specific information about pain. Patients found information on the Internet to be of good quality and quite easy to find and understand. In general, Respondents did not learn anything new. The on-line medical information confirmed what they already knew. Less than half of the respondents discussed information from the Internet with their physician.

Conclusion

Half of all patients used the Internet for medical information. Patients are reasonably certain that the information is accurate and reliable, while this may not always be the case.

Practice implications

Physicians should inquire about patients’ use of various sources of information (such as the Internet) and offer to clarify any questions or concerns that arise from that use.

Introduction

In recent years the Internet has become one of the major sources of medical information. Worldwide 4.5% of all Internet searches are health related [1]. According to a recent Dutch survey 83% of Dutch citizens between 12 and 75 years of age have access to the Internet and 47% of those have used the Internet to obtain medical information [2]. Large amounts of medical information are now widely available on the Internet and easily accessible to those with Internet access. For many people Internet is now their major source of health information. Searches on the Internet are mostly aimed at information and advice about symptoms, disorders and treatments [3]. The Internet allows patients to communicate with fellow-sufferers. Many websites contain forums or provide the opportunity to chat. Other possibilities are on-line doctor consultation, on-line ordering of drugs, and Internet therapy aimed at psychological problems or coping with chronic diseases. The possibilities seem endless and are easily available to large groups of people.

The majority of patients feel the information on the Internet is reliable and of good quality [4]. Physicians on the other hand remain sceptical about the advantages of the Internet as a source of medical information for the layperson. Health professionals are concerned about the quality of the information and fear that those who consult websites for medical information may not be as likely to consult a real doctor when serious health problems arise [5]. A lot of information on the Internet is inaccurate, incomplete or out of date. Desperate patients (for instance patients with unexplained chronic pain) may seize whatever information is available, even information concerning unproven treatments or personal opinions of fellow-patients. Information on the Internet is unregulated and it can be difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate sources. A lot of information is commercial, but cannot easily be identified as such. Without proper guidance, information on the Internet can be harmful, confusing and overwhelming [6].

For physicians it is important to know whether and how their patients use the Internet for information concerning their health. In a survey of patients of a primary care practice in the United States only a minority (41%) of those using the Internet for health information discussed this information with their doctor [4]. As patients increasingly obtain medical information from the Internet and become active participants in the maintenance of their own health, the doctor–patient relationship changes accordingly [5]. It has been advised that physicians should specifically inquire about their patients’ use of the Internet and assist patients in their search for accurate, reliable and understandable information about their disease [7].

Not much is known about the health-related Internet use of (pain) patients in the Netherlands. The aims of this study were to determine the proportion of patients attending a university pain center who use the Internet to obtain information about their pain problem and to establish how these patients find, evaluate and use this information.

Section snippets

Design and sample

A self-administered survey on pain-related Internet use was designed and mailed to 200 consecutive new patients attending the Pain Center of the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) in the Netherlands between May 2006 and October 2006. Patients filled in the survey before their first visit to the Pain Center. The UMCG is a 1339-bed teaching hospital and is situated in the north of the Netherlands. It serves a population of about 2 million people. The UMCG catchment area covers one-third

Characteristics of the sample and response

Of the 200 surveys mailed, 122 were returned, resulting in a response rate of 61%. We found no significant differences in age, sex and referral type (referral for monodisciplinary or multidisciplinary evaluation) between the responders and non-responders.

Mean age of the responders was 51.3 years (S.D. = 14.5, range 15–85) and 58% of the responders were female. Characteristics of the responders are shown in Table 1.

Internet access

Of the respondents 66% had access to the Internet. Respondents who had Internet

Discussion

The present study assessed the extent of Internet access and on-line searching for medical and pain-related information among patients of a Dutch university pain center prior to their first consultation at the Pain Center. The age and sex demographics found in this group do not differ significantly from those found in a previous study among patients of our Pain Center [8]. Women comprise the majority of the respondents and the group has a high mean age. In this regard the respondents in this

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS).

References (33)

  • T.H. Wagner et al.

    The demand for consumer health information

    J Health Econ

    (2001)
  • L.C. Soot et al.

    Vascular surgery and the Internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information

    J Vasc Surg

    (1999)
  • G. Eysenbach et al.

    What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the Internet

  • Statistics Netherlands VH. Research personal ICT-use: 2005; 2005...
  • K.S. Shuyler et al.

    What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics Web site

    J Med Internet Res

    (2003)
  • J.A. Diaz et al.

    Patients’ use of the Internet for medical information

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2002)
  • J.G. Anderson et al.

    The impact of CyberHealthcare on the physician-patient relationship

    J Med Syst

    (2003)
  • H. Skinner et al.

    How adolescents use technology for health information: implications for health professionals from focus group studies

    J Med Internet Res

    (2003)
  • A.R. Jadad

    What will it take to bring the Internet into the consulting room? We cannot remain oblivious to our patients’ expectations

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2005)
  • B. Reitsma et al.

    Pain and patienthood

    Clin J Pain

    (1997)
  • B. Reitsma

    The end of the line? Evaluation of a multidisciplinary team approach to chronic pain

    (1994)
  • Bodde MI, Schiphorst Preuper HR, van Wijhe M, Reneman MF. The medical pathway of patients with chronic low back pain;...
  • M.K. Bundorf et al.

    Who searches the internet for health information?

    Health Serv Res

    (2006)
  • L.L. Hsu

    An exploratory study of Taiwanese consumers’ experiences of using health-related websites

    J Nurs Res

    (2005)
  • M. Murero et al.

    Use of the Internet by patients before and after cardiac surgery: telephone survey

    J Med Internet Res

    (2001)
  • J.B. O’Connor et al.

    Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • Cited by (108)

    • YouTube as a source of information for arteriovenous malformations: A content-quality and optimization analysis

      2021, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Knowledge acquired by patients from internet sources tends to be rudimentary, incomplete and may lead to misinterpretation or false conclusions that may be hazardous [20]. It is difficult to estimate the scope of damage caused by misleading information, however, since more than half of patients find online information credible, the consequences of erroneous medical information may be severe [21,22]. As many as 7 videos contained factual errors, such as the incorrect definition of AVMs, a misleading definition of symptomatology, and the omission of key treatment methods.

    • Quality and readability of online information on dental treatment for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea

      2020, International Journal of Medical Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      And most of the Internet users believed that the quality of the information they found was good and reliable [5]. However the provision of Internet information is generally unsupervised and such circumstances create an environment in which the layman experiences difficulties in distinguishing accurate medical information [6]. Health experts are expressing concern that information on the Internet can be harmful in the absence of adequate advice [6–8].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text