Elsevier

Pancreatology

Volume 14, Issue 1, January–February 2014, Pages 27-35
Pancreatology

Original article
Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation in chronic pancreatitis: Recommendations from PancreasFest

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2013.10.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Description

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is a surgical procedure used to treat severe complications of chronic pancreatitis or very high risk of pancreatic cancer while reducing the risk of severe diabetes mellitus. However, clear guidance on indications, contraindications, evaluation, timing, and follow-up are lacking.

Methods

A working group reviewed the medical, psychological, and surgical options and supporting literature related to TPIAT for a consensus meeting during PancreasFest.

Results

Five major areas requiring clinical evaluation and management were addressed: These included: 1) indications for TPIAT; 2) contraindications for TPIAT; 3) optimal timing of the procedure; 4) need for a multi-disciplinary team and the roles of the members; 5) life-long management issues following TPIAP including diabetes monitoring and nutrition evaluation.

Conclusions

TPIAT is an effective method of managing the disabling complications of chronic pancreatitis and risk of pancreatic cancer in very high risk patients. Careful evaluation and long-term management of candidate patients by qualified multidisciplinary teams is required. Multiple recommendations for further research were also identified.

Section snippets

Rationale

Recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) (ICD-9 577.9) are related progressive inflammatory syndromes of the pancreas associated with complications that can be disabling and life threatening. In many cases, standard medical and endoscopic treatment is ineffective, while total pancreatectomy alone leads to brittle diabetes with hypoglycemia linked to loss of counter-regulatory pancreatic glucagon. An alternative is total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation

Guideline focus

The PancreasFest working group framed the development of their discussion questions and guidance statements around three areas of concern: 1) Indications and contraindications for TPIAT; 2) Evaluation and timing of TPIAT; and 3) Following patients after TPIAT.

Target population

The clinical recommendations guide the evaluation and management of pediatric and adult patients who are potential candidates for TPIAT or who have undergone TPIAT and require ongoing care.

Guideline development process

PancreasFest is an annual meeting that brings together physicians and scientists with interests in the pancreas: pancreatologists, endoscopists, surgeons, radiologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, epidemiologists, statisticians, systems biologists, and experts in biomarkers (typically 150 + attendees).

At PancreasFest 2009, an expert working group convened to identify the most important clinical questions related to TPIAT and prepared state-of-the-art lectures and case studies for

Evidence review and grading

Methods of developing consensus were based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines [20] and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign report [21].

Evidence and modification

The discussion questions presented to attendees of PancreasFest 2012 were followed by one or more guidance statements intended to provide a concise summary and, if indicated, a clinical recommendation. Conference attendees (Appendix A and B) discussed the initial questions and guidance statements of the working group, which were projected for the entire conference to see and revise in real-time. The conference participants then voted on the level of agreement with the statements, with the

Clinical recommendations

Discussion Question 1: What are the indications for considering TPIAT to manage chronic pancreatitis?

Guidance Statement 1: The primary indication for TPIAT is to treat intractable pain in patients with impaired quality of life due to CP or RAP in whom medical, endoscopic, or prior surgical therapy have failed.

Evidence Level: 2a.

Grade of recommendation: B.

Level of Agreement: A 76%; B 19%; C 5%; D 0%; E 0%

Evidence: In patients with CP, pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation should be

Research recommendations

Areas of potential research related to TPIAT were identified by the guideline coauthors and PancreasFest participants. These included additional research on mechanisms and management of pain, psychological assessment and care of the TPIAT recipient, diabetes evaluation, and the role of cancer risk in selecting candidates for TPIAT, and are summarized below.

Guidance Statement 1: A better understanding of pain mechanisms in CP is needed, which could aid in selection of TPIAT candidates. In

Summary

Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplant is a potential treatment option for select patients with severe painful chronic or recurrent acute pancreatitis. Among the PancreasFest participants, there was high consensus (>90% agreement) that the indication for the procedure is intractable pain despite other appropriate treatment modalities in selected patients lacking psychosocial or medical contraindications, that candidates should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team, and that assessment

Disclosure statement

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest related to this material.

Author contributions

Developed the concept and the consensus process: M.A.A., R.E.B, L.F. and D.C.W.

TPIAP Working Group: J.B.M. (chair), M.L.F., A.G, M.E.L., A.S., A.H.

Wrote the Manuscript: M.D.B and D.C.W.

Participated in discussion of statements, reviewed and approved manuscript: All authors and participants.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by conference grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R13DK083216 (2009), R13DK088452 (2010), and R13DK09604 (2012)] and accredited physician education supported by Abbott Laboratories, Aptalis Pharma, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Lilly, and Olympus through the University of Pittsburgh office of Continuing Medical Education. The authors thank Ms. Michelle Kienholz, Ms. Joy Jenko Merusi, and Ms. Marianne Davis for

References (72)

  • M.D. Bellin et al.

    Quality of life improves for pediatric patients after total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplant for chronic pancreatitis

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol The Official Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterological Assoc

    (2011 Sep)
  • D.E. Sutherland et al.

    Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation for chronic pancreatitis

    J Am Coll Surg

    (2012 Apr)
  • S.A. Ahmad et al.

    Factors associated with insulin and narcotic independence after islet autotransplantation in patients with severe chronic pancreatitis

    J Am Coll Surg

    (2005)
  • H.L. Rodriguez Rilo et al.

    Total pancreatectomy and autologous islet cell transplantation as a means to treat severe chronic pancreatitis

    J Gastrointest Surg Official J Soc Surg Aliment Tract

    (2003)
  • C.J. Woolf

    Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain

    Pain

    (2011 Mar)
  • C.R. Chapman et al.

    Postoperative pain trajectories in chronic pain patients undergoing surgery: the effects of chronic opioid pharmacotherapy on acute pain

    J Pain Off J Am Pain Soc

    (2011 Dec)
  • G.O. Ceyhan et al.

    Fate of nerves in chronic pancreatitis: neural remodeling and pancreatic neuropathy

    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol

    (2010 Jun)
  • D.M. Grunkemeier et al.

    The narcotic bowel syndrome: clinical features, pathophysiology, and management

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2007 Oct)
  • W.A. Macrae

    Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on

    Br J Anaesth

    (2008 Jul)
  • H. Kehlet et al.

    Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention

    Lancet

    (2006 May 13)
  • C.L. Wu et al.

    Treatment of acute postoperative pain

    Lancet

    (2011 Jun 25)
  • S.L. Ong et al.

    Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation: an overview

    HPB: The Official J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc

    (2009)
  • M.R. Lucey et al.

    Minimal criteria for placement of adults on the liver transplant waiting list: a report of a national conference organized by the American Society of Transplant Physicians and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

    Liver Transplant Surg Official Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc

    (1997 Nov)
  • J. Dunderdale et al.

    Should pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation in patients with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis be abandoned?

    J Am Coll Surg

    (2013 Apr)
  • R. Lundberg et al.

    Metabolic assessment of patients with chronic pancreatitis prior to total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplant: utility, limitations, and potential

    Am J Transplant

    (2013 Oct)
  • A. Di Sabatino et al.

    Post-splenectomy and hyposplenic states

    Lancet

    (2011 Jul 2)
  • D.K. Mullady et al.

    Type of pain, pain-associated complications, quality of life, disability and resource utilisation in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study

    Gut

    (2011 Jan)
  • S.T. Amann et al.

    Physical and mental quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: a case-control study from the North American pancreatitis study 2 cohort

    Pancreas

    (2013 Jan 25)
  • S. Raimondi et al.

    Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: an overview

    Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2009 Dec)
  • S. Solomon et al.

    Inherited pancreatic cancer syndromes

    Cancer J

    (2012 Nov-Dec)
  • A.B. Lowenfels et al.

    Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in patients with hereditary pancreatitis

    J Am Med Assoc

    (2001)
  • G. Talamini et al.

    Alcohol and smoking as risk factors in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer

    Dig Dis Sci

    (1999)
  • V. Rebours et al.

    Risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with hereditary pancreatitis: a national exhaustive series

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2008 Jan)
  • K.G. Brodovicz et al.

    Impact of diabetes duration and chronic pancreatitis on the association between type 2 diabetes and pancreatic cancer risk

    Diabetes Obes Metab

    (2012 Jul 25)
  • D. Li

    Diabetes and pancreatic cancer

    Mol Carcinog

    (2012 Jan)
  • A.P. Klein

    Genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer

    Mol Carcinog

    (2012 Jan)
  • Cited by (125)

    • Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis

      2023, Surgery Open Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surgery results in a high success rate and eventually provides a definite solution. Surgical treatment of persistent DPDS may involve resection of the upstream gland, with or without pancreatic islet cell autotransplantation to reduce the risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) [64] or, if the upstream duct is of adequate size, Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy preserving pancreatic function and physiological drainage of pancreatic secretions [2,65]. In a prospective study by Maatman and colleagues, 68% (202/299) DPDS patients required operative intervention specifically for symptoms caused by DPDS (17.3% had failed endoscopic attempts before surgery) with resolution of symptoms reported in 89% [22].

    • Pharmacological management of patients undergoing total pancreatectomy with auto-islet transplantation

      2022, Pancreatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      By 6 and 12 months, the average daily ME decreased by 55% (161 mg) and 64% (128 mg) from preoperative requirements, with 23% of patients achieving opioid independence [61]. Given the gradual nature of opioid weaning after TPIAT, it is critical that a pain management specialist be included in the patient's care after surgery to facilitate narcotics tapering in a safe manner [62]. While the goal of TPIAT is to relieve pain, approximately 10–20% of patients will still have chronic pain post-TPIAT.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Working group members; a complete list of participants in the voting process are in the Appendix.

    2

    Co-Authors who participated in the guidance conference and/or helped developed the guidance and evidence statements, and who critically reviewed the paper.

    View full text