Elsevier

Oral Oncology

Volume 81, June 2018, Pages 45-51
Oral Oncology

Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.04.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Nivolumab showed prolonged OS benefit in patients with R/M SCCHN post-platinum.

  • Long-term OS benefit was observed irrespective of PD-L1 expression or HPV status.

  • No new safety concerns were identified from long-term nivolumab treatment.

Abstract

Objectives

We report 2-year results from CheckMate 141 to establish the long-term efficacy and safety profile of nivolumab and outcomes by tumor PD-L1 expression in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M),platinum-refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Methods

Patients with R/M SCCHN with tumor progression/recurrence within 6 months of platinum therapy were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or investigator’s choice (IC). Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS). Data cutoff: September 2017.

Results

With 24.2 months’ minimum follow-up, nivolumab (n = 240) continued to improve OS vs IC (n = 121), hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 (95% CI 0.54–0.86). Nivolumab nearly tripled the estimated 24-month OS rate (16.9%) vs IC (6.0%), and demonstrated OS benefit across patients with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% (HR [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.39–0.78]) and  < 1% (HR [95% CI] = 0.73 [0.49–1.09]), and regardless of tumor HPV status. Estimated OS rates at 18, 24, and 30 months with nivolumab were consistent irrespective of PD-L1 expression (<1%/≥1%). In the nivolumab arm, there were no observed differences in baseline characteristics or safety profile between long-term survivors and the overall population. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 15.3% and 36.9% for nivolumab and IC, respectively.

Conclusion

Nivolumab significantly improved OS at the primary analysis and demonstrated prolonged OS benefit vs IC and maintenance of a manageable and consistent safety profile with 2-year follow-up. OS benefit was observed with nivolumab irrespective of PD-L1 expression and HPV status. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02105636)

Introduction

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) includes neoplasms in the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx, and accounts for 90% of all head and neck cancers [1], [2], [3]. Patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) SCCHN who progress within 6 months after platinum-based therapy have poor long-term prognosis and limited treatment options, with a median overall survival (OS) of ≤6 months [4], [5]. In 2016, nivolumab was approved in the United States for the treatment of this patient population, with European approval following in 2017 [6], [7].

CheckMate 141 evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported quality of life of nivolumab monotherapy vs standard single agent of investigator’s choice (IC) in patients with R/M SCCHN who experienced tumor progression or recurrence within 6 months of platinum-based therapy administered in the adjuvant, primary (ie, with radiation), recurrent, or metastatic setting [8], [9]. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve OS at the primary analysis in this patient population, hazard ratio (HR) vs IC = 0.70 (97.73% confidence interval [CI] 0.51–0.96); p = 0.01 [8]. With 1-year follow-up, nivolumab continued to improve OS compared with IC; HR = 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 0.90) [10]. The Kaplan-Meier–estimated 18-month OS rate with nivolumab was nearly triple that with IC (21.5% vs 8.3%). The objective response rate (ORR) with nivolumab was more than twice that of IC (13.3% vs 5.8%). The safety profile of nivolumab was manageable, with fewer grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) compared with IC. Nivolumab also stabilized quality-of-life measures, whereas clinically meaningful deterioration was observed with IC [9]. Here, we report long-term (2-year) follow-up of CheckMate 141 in the overall population, as well as in subgroups defined by baseline tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and human papillomavirus (HPV) status.

Section snippets

Study design and patients

CheckMate 141 is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT02105636), the detailed study design of which has been described previously [8]. Briefly, eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, had histologically confirmed R/M SCCHN of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx, and had tumor progression on or within 6 months after the last dose of platinum-based chemotherapy administered in the locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease setting. Patients were randomized

Patients

Baseline characteristics of the 361 randomized patients have been described previously [8]. Compared with the primary analysis [8], baseline tumor PD-L1 expression and HPV status were quantifiable in 15 and 8 additional patients, respectively (Table 1). At the time of this analysis, 8 (3.4%) patients remained on treatment in the nivolumab arm compared with 0 in the IC arm (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Sixteen patients in the nivolumab arm discontinued treatment between 1 and

Discussion

With long-term (minimum 2-year) follow-up, nivolumab demonstrated prolonged OS benefit compared with IC and maintained a favorable safety profile in patients with R/M SCCHN post–platinum therapy. At the time of the current analysis, there were 8 patients (3.4%) continuing on nivolumab treatment and no patients continuing on IC.

Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to demonstrate OS benefit across PD-L1 expressors/non-expressors in this patient population. Notably, Kaplan-Meier–estimated OS rates

Conclusion

Nivolumab is an established therapeutic option in R/M SCCHN post-platinum therapy and the only immunotherapy to demonstrate significant OS improvement in the primary analysis of a phase 3 study (CheckMate 141). Nivolumab is also the only immunotherapy to stabilize QoL in this patient population. With long-term follow-up, nivolumab demonstrated prolonged OS benefit compared with IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab) and maintained a favorable safety profile, with no new safety signals

Conflict of interest

R.L.F. reports consultancy role for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, and Pfizer; grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and VentiRx. G.B.Jr. reports grants from Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Immatics, Macrogenics, Merck, Novartis, and Xcovery; consultancy fees from ARIAD, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Clovis, Genentech, Immatics, Merck, Novartis, and Xcovery; advisory board

Financial support

The work was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the patients and their families, as well as the participating teams, for making this study possible. This study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, NJ) and ONO Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Qiong Wang, PhD, and Beth Burke, PhD, CMPP, of Evidence Scientific Solutions Inc, funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text