Nivolumab vs investigator’s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression
Introduction
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) includes neoplasms in the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx, and accounts for 90% of all head and neck cancers [1], [2], [3]. Patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) SCCHN who progress within 6 months after platinum-based therapy have poor long-term prognosis and limited treatment options, with a median overall survival (OS) of ≤6 months [4], [5]. In 2016, nivolumab was approved in the United States for the treatment of this patient population, with European approval following in 2017 [6], [7].
CheckMate 141 evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported quality of life of nivolumab monotherapy vs standard single agent of investigator’s choice (IC) in patients with R/M SCCHN who experienced tumor progression or recurrence within 6 months of platinum-based therapy administered in the adjuvant, primary (ie, with radiation), recurrent, or metastatic setting [8], [9]. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve OS at the primary analysis in this patient population, hazard ratio (HR) vs IC = 0.70 (97.73% confidence interval [CI] 0.51–0.96); p = 0.01 [8]. With 1-year follow-up, nivolumab continued to improve OS compared with IC; HR = 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 0.90) [10]. The Kaplan-Meier–estimated 18-month OS rate with nivolumab was nearly triple that with IC (21.5% vs 8.3%). The objective response rate (ORR) with nivolumab was more than twice that of IC (13.3% vs 5.8%). The safety profile of nivolumab was manageable, with fewer grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) compared with IC. Nivolumab also stabilized quality-of-life measures, whereas clinically meaningful deterioration was observed with IC [9]. Here, we report long-term (2-year) follow-up of CheckMate 141 in the overall population, as well as in subgroups defined by baseline tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and human papillomavirus (HPV) status.
Section snippets
Study design and patients
CheckMate 141 is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT02105636), the detailed study design of which has been described previously [8]. Briefly, eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, had histologically confirmed R/M SCCHN of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx, and had tumor progression on or within 6 months after the last dose of platinum-based chemotherapy administered in the locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease setting. Patients were randomized
Patients
Baseline characteristics of the 361 randomized patients have been described previously [8]. Compared with the primary analysis [8], baseline tumor PD-L1 expression and HPV status were quantifiable in 15 and 8 additional patients, respectively (Table 1). At the time of this analysis, 8 (3.4%) patients remained on treatment in the nivolumab arm compared with 0 in the IC arm (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Sixteen patients in the nivolumab arm discontinued treatment between 1 and
Discussion
With long-term (minimum 2-year) follow-up, nivolumab demonstrated prolonged OS benefit compared with IC and maintained a favorable safety profile in patients with R/M SCCHN post–platinum therapy. At the time of the current analysis, there were 8 patients (3.4%) continuing on nivolumab treatment and no patients continuing on IC.
Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to demonstrate OS benefit across PD-L1 expressors/non-expressors in this patient population. Notably, Kaplan-Meier–estimated OS rates
Conclusion
Nivolumab is an established therapeutic option in R/M SCCHN post-platinum therapy and the only immunotherapy to demonstrate significant OS improvement in the primary analysis of a phase 3 study (CheckMate 141). Nivolumab is also the only immunotherapy to stabilize QoL in this patient population. With long-term follow-up, nivolumab demonstrated prolonged OS benefit compared with IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab) and maintained a favorable safety profile, with no new safety signals
Conflict of interest
R.L.F. reports consultancy role for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, and Pfizer; grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and VentiRx. G.B.Jr. reports grants from Adaptimmune, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Immatics, Macrogenics, Merck, Novartis, and Xcovery; consultancy fees from ARIAD, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Clovis, Genentech, Immatics, Merck, Novartis, and Xcovery; advisory board
Financial support
The work was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the patients and their families, as well as the participating teams, for making this study possible. This study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, NJ) and ONO Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Qiong Wang, PhD, and Beth Burke, PhD, CMPP, of Evidence Scientific Solutions Inc, funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb.
References (15)
- et al.
Epidemiologic trends in head and neck cancer and aids in diagnosis
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am
(2014) - et al.
The role of antagonists of the PD-1:PD-L1/PD-L2 axis in head and neck cancer treatment
Oral Oncol.
(2016) - et al.
Nivolumab versus standard, single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141): health-related quality-of-life results from a randomised, phase 3 trial
Lancet Oncol
(2017) - et al.
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eur J Cancer
(2009) - et al.
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
Int J Cancer
(2015) - et al.
The economic burden of head and neck cancer: a systematic literature review
Pharmacoeconomics
(2014) Drug Insight: cetuximab in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Nat Clin Pract Oncol
(2008)