Kappa free light chains could predict early disease course in multiple sclerosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.02.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Our study suggested kappa free light chains (KFLC) as a quantitative marker to predict early disability in multiple sclerosis (MS).

  • KFLC resulted a significant predictor for disability over time and early treatment in MS.

  • KFLC were not associated to known MS prognostic markers such as gender, age at onset, and enhancing lesions.

  • KFLC are easy-detectable and quantitative, but not a substitute for OB.

Abstract

Background

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chains (KFLC) have been suggested as quantitative alternative to oligoclonal bands (OB) in multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis. Despite OB have been associated to poor disease prognosis, little is known on KFLC in predicting MS early progression. Our aim is to evaluate the prognostic value of KFLC in a cohort of Italian MS patients.

Methods

100 patients (64 females) underwent CSF analysis during their diagnostic MS work-up. We collected clinical/paraclinical features (gender, age at onset, clinical course, early MS treatments (within 1 year), gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions), calculated K index (ratio CSF-serum KFLC and albumin), and MS severity score (MSSS) at last follow up (minimum 1 year). Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney descriptive analysis, Spearman correlation for independent samples, and linear regression for significant predictors.

Results

K index resulted a significant predictor for disability over time being higher in patients who developed greater MSSS. Accordingly, K index was also significantly increased in patients undergoing early versus delayed treatment (N = 50/100, p = 0.046). A similar role in predicting MS disability was confirmed for age at onset. No other factors were retained in our regression model. Of note, K index was not associated to known MS prognostic markers such as gender, age at onset, and Gd+ lesions (N = 31/96).

Conclusion

Our study suggests KFLC as a CSF quantitative marker to predict early disability in MS (despite not being a substitute for OB).

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) course presents a high variability among individuals ranging from a minimal disability over time to a rapid and severe progression (Tutuncu et al., 2013). Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) with a different risk to benefit ratios impact on disease history, and the possibility of predicting early MS course is crucial. Many clinical and radiological factors at MS diagnosis have been related to MS prognosis, such as gender, age of onset, disability, number of relapses, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures (Swanton et al., 2014, Wattjes et al., 2015). A similar role has been proposed for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers: notably the presence of oligoclonal IgG bands (OB) has been introduced in the 2017 McDonald criteria for dissemination in time (Thompson et al., 2018). Although OB have been related to clinical isolated syndromes (CIS) conversion to MS (Dobson et al., 2013), a role in predicting progression is still debated (Becker et al., 2015) especially if unrelated to clinical and radiological data (Moroso et al., 2015). Several authors considered not only the presence, but also the number of OB (Avasarala et al., 2001) as a marker for MS prognosis. Moreover, not only the presence of IgG but also of IgM OB at the time of diagnosis has been related to a worse outcome (Mandrioli et al., 2008). However, OB remain a mainly qualitative measure of intrathecal synthesis whose result could be also influenced by operator interpretation (Gastaldi et al., 2017). CSF immunoglobulin free light chains (FLC) have been suggested as quantitative alternative to OB in MS diagnosis (Crespi et al., 2017). CSF-serum ratio of kappa FLC corrected for albumin ratio (Presslauer et al., 2016) has been demonstrated as a valid and rather-independent tool alternative to OB detection in CIS and MS patients. Despite OB were associated to poor disease prognosis, little is known on FLC in predicting MS early progression (Rathbone et al., 2018) and could probably not be related to lesion load (Voortman et al., 2017). Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic value of KFLC in a cohort of Italian MS patients who underwent lumbar puncture in their diagnostic MS work-up.

Section snippets

Methods

We recruited 100 patients (64 females) who underwent lumbar puncture (LP) in their diagnostic MS work-up including who: 1) had a CSF study at the time of their MS work up including OB and FLC measures. 2) had a diagnosis of CIS or MS according to McDonald 2017. 3) had a minimum follow up from LP of 1 year. Control population included 97 neurological non-inflammatory diseases excluding lympho-proliferative disorders.

Demographic and clinical variables at diagnosis were recorded: gender, age at

Results

Baseline features are summarized in Table 1. Median age at onset was 34.4 years (SD ± 10.7). MS course at diagnosis was: 2 radiological isolated syndromes (RIS), 9 CIS, 84 relapsing-remitting (RR) MS, and 5 progressive (PR) MS. Median time from onset to last follow up was 3.9 years (±5.0).

Overall, 92 patient had intrathecal synthesis, 5 had no or indistinct bands, and 3 had similar bands both in serum and CSF; median number of CSF bands was 13 (range 0–42). Mean K index 68.2 (SD 84.4) and CSF

Discussion

Our data suggest a prognostic role of K index for developing early disability in MS: this quantitative marker of intrathecal synthesis showed a direct correlation with MSSS and could be effective in stratifying the risk among those patients who had classically defined OB. In fact, we also confirmed the correlation of disability and OB that remains an established but qualitative and frequent marker to intrathecal synthesis. Notably, the number of bands or CSF IgG did not relate to MSSS in our

Conclusion

We suggest a prognostic value of intrathecal synthesis using K index in terms of disability over time. This quantitative marker is not a substitute for OB in MS diagnosis, but could help also in differentiating patients with intrathecal synthesis according the risk of severe outcomes.

Acknowledgements

None.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Vecchio received a Merk-Serono fellowship.

References (25)

  • J. Frau et al.

    Intrathecal oligoclonal bands synthesis in multiple sclerosis: is it always a prognostic factor?

    J. Neurol.

    (2018)
  • M. Gastaldi et al.

    Cerebrospinal fluid analysis and the determination of oligoclonal bands.

    Neurol. Sci.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Biomarkers in multiple sclerosis

      2023, Translational Neuroimmunology: Multiple Sclerosis: Volume 8
    • K index utility as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in the assessment of patients with suspected Multiple Sclerosis

      2022, Journal of Neuroimmunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      EDSS at the last follow-up was used to derivate MS Severity Score (MSSS) (Roxburgh et al., 2005). Decision of the expert treating neurologist (who was never aware of FLC values) of introduction of DMT according to the rules of best clinical practice was used as a further surrogate marker of disease severity (Vecchio et al., 2019). Anonymised matched CSF and serum samples of each patient were centrifuged for 10 min at 3000g and 2000 g, respectively, and stored at −20° until analysis, according to standardized methods (Valencia-Vera et al., 2018; Bernardi et al., 2021).

    • Mono/polyclonal free light chains as challenging biomarkers for immunological abnormalities

      2022, Advances in Clinical Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Increased FLC indices were shown to correctly identified patients with high conversion risk to multiple sclerosis and predicted time of conversion from CIS [122]. Some have suggested that the FLC index may represent a reliable marker of humoral immune response to facilitate treatment [123]. Technically, the FLC index provides a rapid, robust and quantitative approach that is automated in most clinical laboratories thus providing excellent inter-facility correlation [118] at low cost (vs OCB) [115].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text