Elsevier

Maturitas

Volume 134, April 2020, Pages 56-61
Maturitas

European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) and International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS) position statement on managing the menopause after gynecological cancer: focus on menopausal symptoms and osteoporosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.01.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Worldwide, it is estimated that about 1.3 million new gynecological cancer cases are diagnosed each year.

  • Management of menopausal symptoms and the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in women with gynecological cancer needs to be individualized, with or without menopausal hormone therapy, according to tumor type and stage, and the woman’s age.

  • In women who are taking anti-estrogenic therapies such as aromatase inhibitors, estrogen-based therapies are contraindicated and non-hormonal options are recommended as initial therapy.

Abstract

Introduction

Worldwide, it is estimated that about 1.3 million new gynecological cancer cases are diagnosed each year. For 2018, the predicted annual totals were cervix uteri 569,847, corpus uteri 382,069, ovary 295,414, vulva 44,235 and va​gina 17,600. Treatments include hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. These can result in loss of ovarian function and, in women under the age of 45, early menopause.

Aim

The aim of this position statement is to set out an individualized approach to the management, with or without menopausal hormone therapy, of menopausal symptoms and the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in women with gynecological cancer.

Materials and methods

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

Summary recommendations

The limited data suggest that women with low-grade, early-stage endometrial cancer may consider systemic or topical estrogens. However, menopausal hormone therapy may stimulate tumor growth in patients with more advanced disease, and non-hormonal approaches are recommended. Uterine sarcomas may be hormone dependent, and therefore estrogen and progesterone receptor testing should be undertaken to guide decisions as to whether menopausal hormone therapy or non-hormonal strategies should be used. The limited evidence available suggests that menopausal hormone therapy, either systemic or topical, does not appear to be associated with harm and does not decrease overall or disease-free survival in women with non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer and germ cell tumors. Caution is required with both systemic and topical menopausal hormone therapy in women with serous and granulosa cell tumors because of their hormone dependence, and non-hormonal options are recommended as initial therapy. There is no evidence to contraindicate the use of systemic or topical menopausal hormone therapy by women with cervical, vaginal or vulvar cancer, as these tumors are not considered to be hormone dependent.

Introduction

Worldwide, it is estimated about 1.3 million new gynecological cancer cases are diagnosed each year. For 2018 the predicted annual totals were cervix uteri 569,847, corpus uteri 382,069, ovary 295,414, vulva 44,235 and va​gina 17,600 [1].

Depending on tumor type and stage, treatments include hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. These can result in loss of ovarian function and, in women under the age of 45, early menopause, which increases the risk not only of osteoporosis but also of cardiovascular disease and cognitive decline [2,3]. Surgically induced menopause often leads to the immediate onset of vasomotor symptoms, which may be more severe than after natural menopause [4]. Vasomotor symptoms may last for many years after natural or surgical menopause [[5], [6], [7]]. Other symptoms, such as those related to vulvovaginal atrophy, are lifelong [8,9].

The management of menopausal symptoms in gynecological cancer survivors depends on their age, tumor type and stage, as well as the use of anti-estrogen therapies (for cancers considered to be hormone dependent) and concomitant morbidities. The aim of this position statement is to provide an individualized approach to the management of menopausal symptoms and the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [10].

Section snippets

Hormonal and non-hormonal management strategies

In women without cancer, administration of systemic estrogen-based menopausal hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms and osteoporosis has a favorable risk–benefit profile for those under the age of 60 years or up to 10 years after menopause [8,[11], [12], [13], [14]]. Systemic menopausal hormone therapy can be administered orally or transdermally. Estrogen alone is given to women who have undergone hysterectomy. Progestogens and the selective estrogen receptor modulator bazedoxifene are added

Endometrial cancer

While most cases of endometrial cancer are diagnosed after the menopause it can occur in younger women, such as those with Lynch syndrome or polycystic ovary syndrome or who are obese. The majority of endometrial cancers are diagnosed at an early stage (Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I–II) and so have a good overall prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of over 85 %. Treatment usually involves hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. Studies of menopausal hormone therapy

Conclusion

An individualized approach to the management of menopausal symptoms and prevention and treatment of osteoporosis after gynecological cancer is required. It should take into account age, tumor type and stage, and concomitant therapies and morbidities. It is best undertaken by a multidisciplinary team of health and allied health professionals. It is of concern that there is a paucity of data. Therefore, there is a need for randomized trials and analysis of data registries to provide a stronger

Contributors

Margaret Rees prepared the initial draft, which was circulated to all other named authors for comments and approval before review and endorsement by the EMAS board and IGCS council members. Production was coordinated by Margaret Rees.

Conflict of interest

Margaret Rees reports personal fees from Sojournix, Inc, outside the remit of the submitted work.

Roberto Angioli declares he has no conflict of interest.

Robert L. Coleman reports grants from NIH, grants from Gateway Foundation, grants from VFounation, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants from Merck, personal fees from Tesaro, personal fees from Medivation, grants and personal fees from Clovis, personal fees from Gamamab, grants and personal fees

Funding

No funding was sought or secured for this position statement.

Provenance and peer review

This is an EMAS and IGCS position statement and was not externally peer reviewed.

Co publication statement

This statement is being simultaneously published in Maturitas and the International Journal of Gynecological Cancer on behalf of the European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) and International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS}.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the board and council members from both societies for their helpful comments.

References (70)

  • J.E. Desmarais et al.

    Managing menopausal symptoms and depression in tamoxifen users: implications of drug and medicinal interactions

    Maturitas

    (2010)
  • A. Cano et al.

    Calcium in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis: EMAS clinical guide

    Maturitas

    (2018)
  • J.A. Chapman et al.

    Estrogen replacement in surgical stage I and II endometrial cancer survivors

    Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.

    (1996)
  • R.B. Lee et al.

    Estrogen replacement therapy following treatment for stage I endometrial carcinoma

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1990)
  • K.A. Suriano et al.

    Estrogen replacement therapy in endometrial cancer patients

    Obstet. Gynecol.

    (2001)
  • A. Gadducci et al.

    Uterine smooth muscle tumors of unknown malignant potential: a challenging question

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2019)
  • C.I. Liao et al.

    Trends in the incidence of serous fallopian tube, ovarian, and peritoneal cancer in the US

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2018)
  • L.C. Peres et al.

    Histotype classification of ovarian carcinoma: a comparison of approaches

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2018)
  • Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer et al.

    Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies

    Lancet

    (2015)
  • D.M. Gershenson

    Management of borderline ovarian tumours

    Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.

    (2017)
  • C. Rousset-Jablonski et al.

    Fertility preservation, contraception and menopause hormone therapy in women treated for rare ovarian tumours: guidelines from the French national network dedicated to rare gynaecological cancers

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (2019)
  • J.D. Martin et al.

    The influence of estrogen and progesterone receptors on survival in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1986)
  • C.L. Kuhle et al.

    Menopausal hormone therapy in cancer survivors: a narrative review of the literature

    Maturitas

    (2016)
  • L.A. Rauh et al.

    Hormone replacement therapy after treatment for cervical cancer: are we adhering to standard of care?

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2017)
  • E. Ploch

    Hormonal replacement therapy in patients after cervical cancer treatment

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (1987)
  • P. Singh et al.

    Hormone replacement after gynaecological cancer

    Maturitas

    (2010)
  • E.L. Moss et al.

    Iatrogenic menopause after treatment for cervical cancer

    Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.)

    (2016)
  • J.V. Lacey et al.

    Use of hormone replacement therapy and adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2000)
  • R.M. Harris et al.

    Diethylstilboestrol--a long-term legacy

    Maturitas

    (2012)
  • F. Bray et al.

    Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (2018)
  • S.S. Faubion et al.

    Long-term health consequences of premature or early menopause and considerations for management

    Climacteric

    (2015)
  • N.E. Avis et al.

    Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Duration of menopausal vasomotor symptoms over the menopause transition

    JAMA Intern. Med.

    (2015)
  • The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Menopause: diagnosis and management NICE guideline [NG23]...
  • J.L. Shifren et al.

    NAMS recommendations for clinical care of midlife women working group. The north american menopause society recommendations for clinical care of midlife women

    Menopause

    (2014)
  • R.H. Cobin et al.

    AACE reproductive endocrinology scientific committee. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology position statement on menopause-2017 update

    Endocr. Pract.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text