Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 75, Issue 2, February 2012, Pages 203-208
Lung Cancer

Safety and feasibility of a combined exercise intervention for inoperable lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A pilot study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.07.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the safety and feasibility of a six-week supervised structured exercise and relaxation training programme on estimated peak oxygen consumption, muscle strength and health related quality of life (HRHRQOL) in patients with inoperable lung cancer, undergoing chemotherapy.

Methods

A prospective, single-arm intervention study of supervised, hospital based muscle and cardiovascular group training and individual home-based training. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) was assessed using an incremental exercise test. Muscle strength was measured with one repetition maximum test (1RM). HRQOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale.

Results

Twenty-five patients with non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) stage III–IV and four patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC-ED) were recruited. Six patients (20.7%) dropped out leaving 23 patients for analysis. Exercise adherence in the group training was 73.0% and 8.7% in the home-based training. There were improvements in estimated VO2peak and six-minute walk distance (6 MWD) as well as increased muscle strength measurements (p < 0.05). There was significant improvement in the “emotional well-being” parameter (FACT-L) while there were no significant changes in HRQOL.

Conclusion

Exercise training produces significant improvements in physiological indices and emotional HRQOL and is safe and feasible in patients with advanced stage lung cancer, undergoing chemotherapy. No analysis on home-based training was done because of low adherence.

Introduction

Physical exercise in selected groups of cancer patients can relieve the burden of disease symptoms and side effects from anticancer treatment, e.g. poor exercise tolerance, fatigue, depression and anxiety [1], [2], [3], [4]. The benefits of physical exercise for cancer patients are described in a series of studies [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], most of which included patients with breast cancer and haematological neoplasias. The studies measured HRQOL and functional capacity and included patients groups with early stage disease. Only two exercise intervention studies have included patients with lung cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy [12], [13] and only one study, Temel et al. [12] investigated the effect of physical training in advanced lung cancer (NSCLC III–IV) and found no significant improvement or decline in HRQOL, anxiety, depression, and physical function (assessed by six minutes walking distance (6 MWD)). However, significant improvement was demonstrated in strength in a single muscle group. Other studies have shown significant improvements following exercise intervention in quality of life and physical function (6 MWD) as well as physical capacity (VO2peak and 1RM) in patients with lung cancer who were at an earlier stage of disease (NSCLC I–III, SCLC LD) [13], [14], [15], [16], [17].

Moreover, it has been shown that physical activity and relaxation training can relieve side-effects and symptoms in cancer patients with advanced disease who are undergoing chemotherapy [18], [19], [20]. It is not known whether these benefits of physical activity can be achieved in patients with advanced NSCLC and SCLC during chemotherapy. We investigated the impact on aerobic capacity (VO2peak), muscle strength (1RM), and quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with lung cancer (NSCLC stage III–IV and SCLC-ED) undergoing a six-week hospital based, supervised and structured, muscle-cardiovascular-relaxation training program and home based exercise program while they received chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the intervention could increase physical capacity (fitness and strength) and functional capacity (6 MWD) as well as improve HRQOL.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Patients >18 years with a WHO performance status 0–2 with stage III–IV NSCLC and SCLC-ED who were undergoing chemotherapy were referred from the Dept. of Oncology at the Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. Exclusion criteria: brain or bone metastases; prolonged bone marrow suppression; anti-coagulant treatment; symptomatic heart disease, including congestive heart failure, arrhythmia or myocardial infarction diagnosed within the last three months; inability to provide informed

Results

From October 2008 to December 2009, 258 patients with inoperable NSCLC were screened for eligibility (Fig. 1). Twenty-nine patients were included (16 females, 13 males; median age 63 years) (Table 2). All 29 completed baseline testing, however six patients (20.6%) did not perform the 6-week test point due to loss of motivation (n = 3) or decrease in performance status (n = 3). Hence, 23 patients undergoing concurrent systemic treatment were eligible for analysis (Table 3).

Discussion

The current study is one of the first to test whether a supervised, group based physical intervention is beneficial and safe for patients with advanced stage lung cancer while they undergo chemotherapy. According to two recently published reviews by Granger et al. [30] and Jones et al. [31] no studies including patients with advanced stage lung cancer have shown significant improvements in aerobic capacity. The current study showed significant improvements in aerobic capacity, muscle strength,

Conclusion

The Study shows that patients with advanced stage lung cancer can carry out a 6-week supervised, structured and group based out-patient training program and improve their physical capacity, functional capacity and emotional wellbeing. The study furthermore shows that home training used in supplement to the supervised training in this group of patients is not a realistic option due to the lack of adherence. More studies are needed in this area to confirm this point.

The completion rate (79%) and

Conflict of interest

The authors made no disclosures.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from The Simonsen Foundation, The Wedell-Wendellsborgs Foundation, The Wilma Peetz Grant, Roche A/S, The Novo Nordisk Foundation and The Danish Cancer Society.

References (38)

  • D.A. Galvao et al.

    Review of exercise intervention studies in cancer patients

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • F. Cramp et al.

    Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2008)
  • M.L. McNeely et al.

    Effects of exercise on breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    CMAJ

    (2006)
  • M. Markes et al.

    Exercise for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2006)
  • K.S. Courneya et al.

    A randomized trial of exercise and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors

    Eur J Cancer Care

    (2003)
  • R.J. Segal et al.

    Resistance exercise in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Comment

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • A.J. Daley et al.

    Randomized trial of exercise therapy in women treated for breast cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • P.B. Jacobsen et al.

    Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological and activity-based interventions for cancer-related fatigue [erratum appears in Health Psychol 2008;27:42]

    Health Psychol

    (2007)
  • R. Knols et al.

    Physical exercise in cancer patients during and after medical treatment: a systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text