Safety and feasibility of a combined exercise intervention for inoperable lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A pilot study
Introduction
Physical exercise in selected groups of cancer patients can relieve the burden of disease symptoms and side effects from anticancer treatment, e.g. poor exercise tolerance, fatigue, depression and anxiety [1], [2], [3], [4]. The benefits of physical exercise for cancer patients are described in a series of studies [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], most of which included patients with breast cancer and haematological neoplasias. The studies measured HRQOL and functional capacity and included patients groups with early stage disease. Only two exercise intervention studies have included patients with lung cancer who were undergoing chemotherapy [12], [13] and only one study, Temel et al. [12] investigated the effect of physical training in advanced lung cancer (NSCLC III–IV) and found no significant improvement or decline in HRQOL, anxiety, depression, and physical function (assessed by six minutes walking distance (6 MWD)). However, significant improvement was demonstrated in strength in a single muscle group. Other studies have shown significant improvements following exercise intervention in quality of life and physical function (6 MWD) as well as physical capacity (VO2peak and 1RM) in patients with lung cancer who were at an earlier stage of disease (NSCLC I–III, SCLC LD) [13], [14], [15], [16], [17].
Moreover, it has been shown that physical activity and relaxation training can relieve side-effects and symptoms in cancer patients with advanced disease who are undergoing chemotherapy [18], [19], [20]. It is not known whether these benefits of physical activity can be achieved in patients with advanced NSCLC and SCLC during chemotherapy. We investigated the impact on aerobic capacity (VO2peak), muscle strength (1RM), and quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with lung cancer (NSCLC stage III–IV and SCLC-ED) undergoing a six-week hospital based, supervised and structured, muscle-cardiovascular-relaxation training program and home based exercise program while they received chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the intervention could increase physical capacity (fitness and strength) and functional capacity (6 MWD) as well as improve HRQOL.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
Patients >18 years with a WHO performance status 0–2 with stage III–IV NSCLC and SCLC-ED who were undergoing chemotherapy were referred from the Dept. of Oncology at the Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. Exclusion criteria: brain or bone metastases; prolonged bone marrow suppression; anti-coagulant treatment; symptomatic heart disease, including congestive heart failure, arrhythmia or myocardial infarction diagnosed within the last three months; inability to provide informed
Results
From October 2008 to December 2009, 258 patients with inoperable NSCLC were screened for eligibility (Fig. 1). Twenty-nine patients were included (16 females, 13 males; median age 63 years) (Table 2). All 29 completed baseline testing, however six patients (20.6%) did not perform the 6-week test point due to loss of motivation (n = 3) or decrease in performance status (n = 3). Hence, 23 patients undergoing concurrent systemic treatment were eligible for analysis (Table 3).
Discussion
The current study is one of the first to test whether a supervised, group based physical intervention is beneficial and safe for patients with advanced stage lung cancer while they undergo chemotherapy. According to two recently published reviews by Granger et al. [30] and Jones et al. [31] no studies including patients with advanced stage lung cancer have shown significant improvements in aerobic capacity. The current study showed significant improvements in aerobic capacity, muscle strength,
Conclusion
The Study shows that patients with advanced stage lung cancer can carry out a 6-week supervised, structured and group based out-patient training program and improve their physical capacity, functional capacity and emotional wellbeing. The study furthermore shows that home training used in supplement to the supervised training in this group of patients is not a realistic option due to the lack of adherence. More studies are needed in this area to confirm this point.
The completion rate (79%) and
Conflict of interest
The authors made no disclosures.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grants from The Simonsen Foundation, The Wedell-Wendellsborgs Foundation, The Wilma Peetz Grant, Roche A/S, The Novo Nordisk Foundation and The Danish Cancer Society.
References (38)
- et al.
Cancer treatment-induced alterations in muscular fitness and quality of life: the role of exercise training
Ann Oncol
(2007) - et al.
A structured exercise program for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
J Thorac Oncol
(2009) - et al.
Exercise capacity before and after an 8-week multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation program in lung cancer patients: a pilot study
Lung Cancer
(2006) - et al.
Pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation and surgery for lung cancer
Lung Cancer
(2007) - et al.
The body weight-walking distance product as related to lung function, anaerobic threshold and peak VO2 in COPD patients
Respir Med
(2001) - et al.
Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument
Lung Cancer
(1995) - et al.
Prognostic value of the six minute walk in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
J Thorac Oncol
(2009) - et al.
Patients’ perceptions of the effectiveness of guided imagery and progressive muscle relaxation interventions used for cancer pain
Complement Ther Clin Pract
(2008) - et al.
Quality of life and the treatment of advanced lung cancer
Clin Lung Cancer
(2003) - et al.
Cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: why is this feature important to evaluate? Can it be improved?
J Thorac Oncol
(2009)