Elsevier

The Knee

Volume 26, Issue 1, January 2019, Pages 20-25
The Knee

Persistent morbidity after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction — A registry study with an eight-year follow-up on a nationwide cohort from 1996 to 2014

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2018.10.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the trends in treatment of patellar dislocation in the Danish population as a whole from 1996 to 2014 and evaluate the incidence of persistent morbidity after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction (MPFL-R).

Methods

This epidemiological study was performed by retrospectively searching the Danish National Patients Registry from 1996 to 2014. The study investigated the trends in surgery performed on patients with patellar dislocations and the risk of persistent patellar morbidity (PPM) with an eight-year follow-up. PPM was defined as a new patella-related contact to the healthcare system more than a year after surgery.

Results

From 1996 to 2014, a total of 1956 MPFL-R were performed in Denmark. In 2014, MPFL-R constituted 75% of all patella-stabilizing surgery and was performed on almost 10% of patients with patellar dislocation. The mean risk of PPM eight years after surgery was 20.9% (18.3–23.4%), and young patients aged 10–17 showed the highest risk of 28.9% (23.7–33.7%).

The risk of PPM over time was significantly higher for other patella-stabilizing surgery (33.8%) and patients receiving conservative treatment (29.4%) compared to MPFL-R.

Conclusions

A rapid rise in the use of MPFL-R was found from 2005 to 2014, constituting 75% of all patella-stabilizing surgery in 2014. The overall risk of persistent patellar morbidity within eight years after MPFL-R was 21%. MPFL-R was found to give a significantly lower risk of PPM over time as compared to other patella-stabilizing surgery and conservative treatment.

Introduction

Primary patellar dislocation constitutes approx. three percent of all knee injuries. The incidence has been found to be 42 per 100,000 person years at risk (PYRS) in general and 108 per 100,000 PYRS among young female patients [1]. Generally, patients suffering first-time acute patellar dislocation are treated conservatively, except patients with associated significant osteochondral injury and patients, who do not improve with normal rehabilitation [2], [3]. Recurrent patellar dislocation is associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis and reduced physical activity and quality of life [4], [5], [6]. Predisposing factors for recurrent instability and dislocation such as trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, femoral antetorsion and an increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance have been identified, and today, it is commonly accepted that each patient should be treated individually in order to address the present predisposing factors [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12].

Over the past decades, the surgical treatment options for patella stabilization have increased, and there has been a rise in surgery rates in the United States [13]. During this period, the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction (MPFL-R) has gained popularity. The MPFL is the most important soft-tissue structure, which provides a medial restraining force that protects against lateral patellar dislocation [14], and studies have shown that ligament was torn in up to 100% of the primary patellar dislocations [15]. MPFL-R has shown promising results; yet there is a risk of bias as studies were conducted among homogeneous patient groups and lacked consistency in reporting complications. This makes it difficult to compare the results [16], [17], [18]. Other studies have shown less promising results, pointing out that many patients suffer from persistent morbidity after surgery, especially patients with trochlear dysplasia [19], [20], [21].

This nationwide retrospective registry study aims to investigate the trends in surgery performed on patients with patellar dislocations from 1996 to 2014 and the risk of persistent patellar morbidity (PPM) with an eight-year follow-up after surgery. Hopefully, this will assist the clinician in choosing the right treatment for the right patient.

Section snippets

Methods

The study was conducted as a retrospective registry study with national population data from the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) and Statistics Denmark. Since 1976, all patients who seek medical care in a hospital (emergency room/walk-in consultation/hospitalized) in Denmark have been registered with their unique social security number in the national patient registry. Danish legislation imposes hospitals in Denmark to report data to DNPR. Patients are registered from the day they seek

Surgical treatment

From 1996 until 2013, the number of patella-stabilizing surgical procedures was stable, but the types of procedures performed changed with a rise in MPFL-R from 2005 (Figure 1). From 2005 until 2014, 1770 patients received 1956 MPFL-R. In 2014, MPFL-R constituted 75% of all patella-stabilizing surgical procedures and was performed on almost 10% of patients with patellar dislocation. After the introduction of the MPFL-R in 2005, the four-year risk of persistent patellar morbidity remained stable

Discussion

The most important finding in the present study was a 21% risk of PPM within the first eight years after MPFL-R, following an investigating of 1956 procedures. This finding can be interpreted in two ways: On the one hand, it must be perceived as being positive that 79% of patients had no contact with the healthcare system regarding their knees with a diagnosis of recurrent patellar instability or acute patellar dislocation. This is in support of the literature, which presents MPFL-R as an

Conclusion

The 2005 to 2014 period saw a rapid rise in the use of MPFL-R, constituting 75% of all patella-stabilizing surgery in 2014. The overall risk of PPM within eight years after MPFL-R was 21%. MPFL-R was found to have a significantly lower risk of PPM over time as compared with other patella-stabilizing surgery and conservative treatment.

Declaration of interest

None.

References (25)

  • T.O. Smith et al.

    What activities do patients with patellar instability perceive makes their patella unstable?

    Knee

    (2011)
  • P. Neyret et al.

    Patellar tendon length—the factor in patellar instability?

    Knee

    (2002)
  • B.B. Hinckel et al.

    Trochleoplasty: historical overview and Dejour technique

    Oper Tech Sports Med

    (2015)
  • K.S. Gravesen et al.

    High incidence of acute and recurrent patellar dislocations: a retrospective nationwide epidemiological study involving 24.154 primary dislocations

    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

    (2017)
  • J.J. Stefancin et al.

    First-time traumatic patellar dislocation: a systematic review

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2007)
  • T.O. Smith et al.

    Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2015)
  • D.M. Atkin et al.

    Characteristics of patients with primary acute lateral patellar dislocation and their recovery within the first 6 months of injury

    Am J Sports Med

    (2000)
  • P. Sillanpaa et al.

    Incidence and risk factors of acute traumatic primary patellar dislocation

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2008)
  • H. Dejour et al.

    Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study

    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

    (1994)
  • T. Köhlitz et al.

    Prevalence and patterns of anatomical risk factors in patients after patellar dislocation: a case control study using MRI

    Eur Radiol

    (2013)
  • L. Lewallen et al.

    First-time patellofemoral dislocation: risk factors for recurrent instability

    J Knee Surg

    (2015)
  • L.W. Lewallen et al.

    Predictors of recurrent instability after acute patellofemoral dislocation in pediatric and adolescent patients

    Am J Sports Med

    (2013)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text