Elsevier

Kidney International

Volume 99, Issue 1, January 2021, Pages 34-47
Kidney International

KDIGO Executive Conclusions
The case for early identification and intervention of chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.012Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) causes substantial global morbidity and increases cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Unlike other chronic diseases with established strategies for screening, there has been no consensus on whether health systems and governments should prioritize early identification and intervention for CKD. Guidelines on evaluating and managing early CKD are available but have not been universally adopted in the absence of incentives or quality measures for prioritizing CKD care. The burden of CKD falls disproportionately upon persons with lower socioeconomic status, who have a higher prevalence of CKD, limited access to treatment, and poorer outcomes. Therefore, identifying and treating CKD at the earliest stages is an equity imperative. In 2019, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a controversies conference entitled “Early Identification and Intervention in CKD.” Participants identified strategies for screening, risk stratification, and treatment for early CKD and the key health system and economic factors for implementing these processes. A consensus emerged that CKD screening coupled with risk stratification and treatment should be implemented immediately for high-risk persons and that this should ideally occur in primary or community care settings with tailoring to the local context.

Keywords

albuminuria
chronic kidney disease
cost-effectiveness
creatinine
cystatin
detection
kidney failure
glomerular filtration rate
health systems
interventions
proteinuria
risk models
risk stratification
screening

Cited by (0)

23

See Appendix for list of Conference Participants.