Elsevier

The Ocular Surface

Volume 14, Issue 3, July 2016, Pages 377-384
The Ocular Surface

Original Research
Influence of Conjunctival Folds on Calculated Tear Meniscus Volume Along the Lower Eyelid

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2016.04.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

In calculating tear meniscus volume (TMV), tear meniscus height (TMH), radius (TMR) and cross-sectional area (TMA) are usually measured at the center of the lower lid margin, but lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOFs) are known to influence the tear meniscus regularity. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of LIPCOFs on TMA measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and consequently, the calculated tear meniscus volume (TMV).

Methods

Using OCT (Cirrus-HD; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), the TMH, TMR and TMA in 42 subjects (13M, 29F; mean age 27.3 SD±8.4 years) were measured directly below the pupil center, plus at temporal and nasal locations perpendicularly below the limbus, where LIPCOFs were also evaluated and graded. TMV for the different locations was calculated. Correlations between LIPCOFs and the tear meniscus parameters were analyzed using the Spearman Rank-Order coefficients. Differences between tear meniscus parameters at the different locations were evaluated by the paired t-test.

Results

Central TMV (5.30±1.42 x10−2μl/mm) was significantly positively correlated to LIPCOF sum (grade 2.4±1.2) (r=0.422; P<.05). The calculated temporal TMV was greater by 0.53x10−2μl/mm compared to the central TMV (P=.037), while there was no significant difference in tear volume between the other locations.

Conclusions

Using OCT it was possible to investigate the influence of LIPCOFs on TMH, TMR, and for the first time on TMA, at central and paracentral positions along the lower lid margin. The presence of LICPOF results in an irregularity of tear meniscus with a difference in the amount of predicted tear volume while measuring TMH or TMR at the different locations.

Introduction

The tear fluid on the ocular surface is present in three sections: at the exposed area between the lids covering the cornea and sclera, in the tear menisci at the lid margins, and in the conjunctival sacs of the upper and lower lid.1 The tear menisci along the superior and inferior lid margins represent 75% to 90% of the tear film volume at the ocular surface,2 although a lower estimate of 27% has been made.1 The shape of the lower central meniscus is described to be roughly wedge-shaped in sagittal section, with a concave anterior surface, and posterior and peripheral surfaces that bathe and moisten the hydrophilic mucosae of the cornea and bulbar conjunctiva or palpebral conjunctiva.3 However, the cross-sectional profile of the meniscus is likely to have a more complex shape,3 with a parabolic anterior profile4 and a posterior surface that is influenced by the shape of the underlying conjunctiva at the paracentral lid locations.5

At the central lid location, the evaluation of tear meniscus parameters is regarded as an indicator of tear film volume.6, 7 The tear meniscus can be characterized by tear meniscus height (TMH), tear meniscus radius (TMR) or cross-sectional tear meniscus area (TMA), and these have been shown to be significantly correlated to one another at the central point of the tear meniscus.8, 9, 10, 11 For paracentral positions along the lower eyelid, however, the relationship between meniscus height, radius, and cross-sectional area has not yet been published.

The volume of the tear meniscus (TMV) has traditionally been calculated from TMH, TMR or TMA of the central lower tear meniscus multiplied by the length of the lid margin.12, 13 Since the meniscus is spread along the eyelid margins, variations in the measured meniscus parameters along the lid are likely to influence the calculation of the lower lid tear meniscus volume. Lid parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOFs) are folds in the inferotemporal and inferonasal quadrants of the bulbar conjunctiva, parallel to the lower lid margin. LIPCOFs can be observed with the slit lamp or by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and they have been found to correlate with dry eye symptoms.5, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 Like conjunctivochalasis, LIPCOFs are assumed to alter the measurement of the tear meniscus area.16, 18, 20, 21

Using a portable digital meniscometer (PDM), it was shown that an increase in LIPCOF grade is associated with a higher TMH and a larger TMR at the nasal and temporal locations of the tear meniscus.22 Furthermore, it was suggested that LIPCOFs also impact the central TMH evaluation, and that the presence of LIPCOFs may cause the central TMH measurement to overestimate the actual central tear meniscus volume.23 However, TMH and TMR measurements are limited to one dimension and describe only the anterior surface of the tear meniscus; they do not account for the posterior section of the meniscus, so the extent of the LIPCOFs is likely to influence the cross-sectional TMA.

Consequently, the aims of this study were: 1) to investigate the influence of LIPCOFs on TMH, TMR and on TMA, measured by OCT at the central and paracentral position of the lower lid, and 2) to analyze the influence of LIPCOFs on the calculated tear meniscus volume at the different locations.

Section snippets

Subjects

Forty-two subjects (13 male, 29 female) were randomly selected from the staff and students of the Höhere Fachschule für Augenoptik Köln (Cologne School of Optometry), Cologne, Germany. The mean age of the subjects was 27.3 ± 8.4 (SD) years (range, 20-67 years). Subjects were excluded if they were pregnant or breast-feeding; had a current or previous condition known to affect the ocular surface or tear film; had a history of previous ocular surgery, including refractive surgery, eyelid

Differences between Tear Meniscus Parameters with Location

Mean values and standard deviations for the tear meniscus parameters at the different locations are summarized in Table 2. Compared to TMH measured in the central location, TMH at the temporal location was 0.088±0.102 mm higher, and at the nasal locations was 0.044±0.081 mm higher (P<.001). Temporal TMH was also found to be 0.044±0.130 mm higher than nasal TMH (P<.05). Compared to TMR measured in the central location, TMR at the temporal location was 0.063±0.061 mm larger (P=.009). However, no

Discussion

The principal aim of the study was to use OCT to investigate the influence of LIPCOFs on TMH, TMR, and for the first time on TMA (and therefore TMV), at the central and paracentral positions along the lower lid margin. For the central TMH, an increasing height was correlated to LIPCOF sum. This is in concordance with a recently published study in which digital slit lamp images were used to measure the central tear meniscus.23 Furthermore, the high-resolution, cross-sectional OCT images used in

Conclusion

Using OCT tear meniscus parameters, it has been possible to investigate the influence of LIPCOFs on TMH, TMR, and for the first time on TMA at the central and paracentral positions on the lower lid. The presence of LIPCOFs results in an irregularity of the tear meniscus along the lid length, and it is also associated with a variation in the relationship between tear volume and tear meniscus height or radius.

References (35)

  • T.R. Golding et al.

    Relationship between tear-meniscus parameters and tear-film breakup

    Cornea

    (1997)
  • J.C. Mainstone et al.

    Tear meniscus measurement in the diagnosis of dry eye

    Curr Eye Res

    (1996)
  • H. Oguz et al.

    The height and radius of the tear meniscus and methods for examining these parameters

    Cornea

    (2000)
  • M. Shen et al.

    Upper and lower tear menisci in the diagnosis of dry eye

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2009)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Dynamic distribution of artificial tears on the ocular surface

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2008)
  • L.W. Jones et al.

    Determination of inferior tear meniscus height and inferior tear meniscus volume using optical coherence tomography

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2004)
  • H. Pult et al.

    The relationship between clinical signs and dry eye symptoms

    Eye (Lond)

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    Sources of support: None.

    Disclosures: The authors have no commercial or proprietary interest in any concept or product discussed in this article.

    Single-copy reprint requests to: Stefan Bandlitz, PhD (address below).

    View full text