An improved electrophysiological method to study peripheral nerve regeneration in rats
Introduction
Despite the overall superior nerve regeneration of rodents compared to that of humans, the rat remains the most commonly used animal model to study the regeneration of peripheral nerves (Sinis et al., 2005, Guntinas-Lichius et al., 2005, Robinson and Madison, 2005, Tos et al., 2004, Varejao et al., 2001). Although the vast majority of peripheral nerve repair procedures in clinical practice occur in the upper limb, the most commonly used nerve injury model is that of the sciatic nerve in the rat (Fujiwara et al., 2007, Worthington, 1969).
In the middle of the 1990s Bertelli and Mira published a median nerve model with the corresponding function test, called the grasping test (Bertelli and Mira, 1995). The usage of this median nerve model provides the obvious advantages of less distress for the animals, a decreased burden of animal care and a simple and easy to handle way to assess the functional nerve regeneration. Furthermore, the rat brachial plexus and its terminal branches bear close similarity to the human one and the grasping test provides a tool for the measurement of functional recovery that is relatively easy to perform. At last a current study from Ibrahim and co-workers had confirmed that section of 4 dorsal roots (C6 to T1) leads to consistent loss of grasping (Ibrahim et al., 2009).
Thus, the rat median nerve model has gained increasing popularity. Studies of end-to-side neurorraphy, regeneration specificity, regeneration effectiveness, axon pruning and strategies for nerve graft or nerve transduction have been conducted using this model (Bertelli et al., 2004, Fujiwara et al., 2007, Ronchi et al., 2009, Sinis et al., 2005, Sinis et al., 2006, Sinis et al., 2008).
In the median nerve model the process of peripheral nerve regeneration can be evaluated with various methods, including the grasping test, histomorphometry and muscle weight (Sinis et al., 2005). The most commonly used evaluation test remains the grasping test, with focus on functional regeneration. However, due to the superior nerve regeneration of rats, several months after treatment slight differences in nerve regeneration could not be figured out by using the grasping test alone (Sinis et al., 2005).
In the clinical setting as well as in other animal models electrophysiologic testing is one of the most popular methods for studies of nerve injury, axonal regeneration and peripheral neuropathy. By this way a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of nerve regeneration is possible without sacrificing the rat.
Even if neurography testing assures a high level of information concerning the quality of axonal nerve regeneration, it remains less cited in the median nerve model of the rat. Reasons for this lack are high technical and financial efforts as well as recurrent difficulties in producing reliable results.
We try to underline the importance of electrophysiologic testing in the median nerve model of the rat for evaluation of axonal recovery after restitution of functional regeneration and discuss the pitfalls that inhibit valid and reliable assessment.
To these aims, we describe our standardized method of electrophysiology in the median nerve model of the rat, then demonstrate electrophysiologic results in animals with primary nerve coaptation as well as nerve transplantation and prove the reliability of the method.
Section snippets
General considerations
In electrophysiology several parameters are also used in clinical practice. Each parameter has its own field of information. The latency time is one parameter in neurography, which includes the neuromuscular transmission up to time of the muscle depolarization. This parameter is similar to distal motor latency, which is used in clinical diagnostics (Bischoff et al., 2008). It provides information about the quality of the fastest conducting nerve fibres (Bischoff et al., 2008). Compound muscle
General observations
All animals survived the operation and the duration of the experiment. They showed normal behaviour in eating and drinking.
Functional results
All operated animals underwent functional assessment of regeneration using the grasping test.
Animals with end-to-end-coaptation (group 2) show a faster development of nerve regeneration than animals with transplantation (group 3), but after 16–18 weeks animals of both groups demonstrated similar strength. After 17 post-operative weeks the force/weight-quotient is about 1.00
Discussion
The median nerve model has become a frequently used animal model for studying the regeneration of peripheral nerves in the rat (Ronchi et al., 2009). Unfortunately, to date no universally accepted method for evaluation of neurography for axonal nerve regeneration is documented in literature (Wang et al., 2008).
The reason for this lack is the huge surgical and technical effort in neurographic measurement which is necessary to produce reliable results. However, the great advantage of the
Acknowledgement
The support of Dr. C. Meisner, Institute for Medical Biometry, University of Tübingen, is gratefully acknowledged.
References (29)
- et al.
Long interpositional nerve graft consistently induces incomplete motor and sensory recovery in the rat. An experimental model to test nerve repair
J Neurosci Methods
(2004) - et al.
The grasping test: a simple behavioral method for objective quantitative assessment of peripheral nerve regeneration in the rat
J Neurosci Methods
(1995) - et al.
Influence of physical parameters of nerve chambers on peripheral nerve regeneration and reinnervation
Exp Neurol
(1996) - et al.
Ultrasound-guided near-nerve neurography for early evaluation of nerve regeneration
J Neurosci Methods
(2008) - et al.
The development of bioartificial nerve grafs for peripheral-nerve regeneration
Trends Biotechnol
(1998) - et al.
Permanent loss of fore-paw grasping requires complete deprivation of afferent input from a minimum of four dorsal roots of the rat brachial plexus
Exp Neurol
(2009) - et al.
The effects of nerve growth factor and its antibodies on axonal numbers in the medial gastrocnemius nerve of the rat
Brain Res
(1984) - et al.
Influence of different types of surface electrodes on amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential
Clin Neurophysiol
(1999) - et al.
Manipulations of the mouse femoral nerve influence the accuracy of pathway reinnervation by motor neurons
Exp Neurol
(2005) - et al.
Functional and morphological assessment of a standardized crush injury of the rat median nerve
J Neurosci Methods
(2009)
Cross-chest median nerve transduction: a new model for the evaluation of nerve regeneration across a 40 mm gap in the rat
J Neurosci Methods
Functional evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration in the rat: walking track analysis
J Neurosci Methods
EMG.NLG: Elektromyographie, Nervenleituntersuchungen
Critically ill polyneuropathy: electrophysiological studies and differentiation from Guillain–Barre syndrome
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Cited by (22)
Electrophysiological measurements of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review
2018, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The average amplitudes in each diabetes group were compared to the control group. The MNCV was calculated as the distance between stimulating electrode to record electrode (mm)/latency (mS) [62]. The first treatment step is to bring blood glucose levels within the normal range to help prevent further nerve damage.
Tanshinone IIA attenuates nerve transection injury associated with nerve regeneration promotion in rats
2017, Neuroscience LettersCitation Excerpt :These findings support the potential therapeutic effects of Tan IIA for repair of peripheral nerve injuries. An electrophysiological experiment was performed to further investigate the functional recovery after nerve injury [21]. We observed the CMAP peak amplitude, the onset of CMAP latency, and NCV after sciatic transection injury and repair.
Mirror-image pain after nerve reconstruction in rats is related to enhanced density of epidermal peptidergic nerve fibers
2015, Experimental NeurologyCitation Excerpt :Significant differences between the end-to-end nerve reconstructed and the control group served as an indication of thermal hypersensitivity. Innervation of motor axons was evaluated by recording evoked compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) of the gastrocnemius muscles (Werdin et al., 2009). Under general anesthesia, the sciatic nerve was exposed through a gluteal muscle-splitting approach using a surgical microscope (Zeiss OP-MI 6-SD; Carl Zeiss, Goettingen, Germany).
Natural conduits for bridging a 15-mm nerve defect: Comparison of the vein supported by muscle and bone marrow stromal cells with a nerve autograft
2013, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryCitation Excerpt :An independent investigator, who was blinded to the treatment of the rodents, performed both behavioural studies. The CMAP is a validated way of assessing nerve regeneration.17 We used a minimally invasive technique to evoke the CMAPs, as described in more detail elsewhere.18
Ultrasound-guided needle positioning near the sciatic nerve to elicit compound muscle action potentials from the gastrocnemius muscle of the rat
2011, Journal of Neuroscience MethodsCitation Excerpt :In neurophysiological testing, this reduction is reflected in a low compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude (Severinsen and Andersen, 2007). Conversely, CMAP amplitude is sometimes used to evaluate the nerve regeneration process in neuropathy in both animal studies and a clinical setting (Campbell, 2008; Werdin et al., 2009). A recent review study has evaluated various methods for the assessment of peripheral nerve regeneration in rodents, including the CMAP (Vleggeert-Lankamp, 2007).
Ginsenoside Rg1 promotes peripheral nerve regeneration in rat model of nerve crush injury
2010, Neuroscience Letters