Guidelines for infection control in nursing homes: a Delphi consensus web-based survey

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2011.04.014Get rights and content

Summary

A nationwide survey was performed using a two-round web-based Delphi procedure to develop a set of consensus guidelines for preventing infections among residents in nursing homes (NHs). The research group was led by an investigative group of six specialists. Research analysts conducted a literature search and review of practice guidelines, systematic reviews and articles or abstracts published in English and French on the topic of infection prevention. The literature search was examined by 23 specialists (who compiled a preliminary list of 301 recommendations). Using a Delphi survey online instrument, 81 experts from all relevant medical specialties in the fields of infection prevention and control and geriatrics rated their agreement with each of the recommendations using a nine-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree). During the second round, 79 participants received anonymous feedback from the first round and assessed a narrowed list of 130 recommendations. Recommendations were retained and classified according to the overall median score and ratings percentages by stakeholders. A total of 79 raters rated ≥10% of items, and 264 recommendations were retained and rated as follows: 240 items reached consensus, 24 items reached near consensus, 37 items were discarded and one recommendation was deleted. Many infections, though not all, can be prevented in the frail elderly. Thus, these guidelines should be adopted by each healthcare professional and facility to implement routine infection control procedures.

Introduction

Endemic and epidemic infections with distinct epidemiology in the current fast-growing elderly population are a major issue in nursing homes (NHs).1 Indeed, residents in NHs are uniquely vulnerable to infection risk because of the long-term-confined environment in which they socialise and live, colonisation by multidrug-resistant micro-organisms (MDROs), physiological changes, underlying diseases, invasive devices, polypharmacy and loss of independence.2 In addition, cross-infections within facilities are promoted by the difficulty of diagnosing infections because of atypical clinical presentation and cognitive impairment in the elderly, limited access to laboratories or radiology, low levels of physician input or unfavourable nurse:patient ratios. Moreover, the transfer of residents between acute care and NHs contributes to the transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).3 As a result, infections in these settings contribute to high morbidity and mortality rates, increased hospital transfers, outbreaks, antimicrobial use and additional costs.4

Evidence concerning infection control principles in NHs proved to be scanty or lacking, which may usually be ascribable to studies’ feasibility. Hospital infection control guidelines are difficult to apply to NHs in view of the differences between these settings.3 Thus, using a web-based Delphi technique, we aimed to collect opinions of a panel of experts to establish and widely disseminate consensus recommendations for infection control in elderly people living in NHs.5

Section snippets

Methods

The research group was led by an investigative group of six specialists in the fields of infectious disease, geriatrics, public health and infection control composed of the Geriatric Infection Risk Monitoring Organization’s (ORIG) committee members and chaired by the chairman of the French Society of Hospital Hygiene (SFHH).4 Four distinct sets of guidelines for infection control in NHs were developed: standard precautions (Topic 1); general non-specific measures for HAI prevention (Topic 2);

Results

The flow chart (Figure 2) describes the participants and recommendations. The ICC was 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.95–0.97) and 0.97 (0.96–0.98) for the first and second rounds respectively. Overall, 20 experts dropped out, limiting the experts’ group to 81 for the first round and 79 for the second round. The overall participation rate was 75%. A total of 79 raters rated ≥10% of items. Of the original 301 recommendations, 264 were retained and classified as follows: 240 items reached

Discussion

Developing evidence-based prevention and control guidelines is a core component for protecting NH residents from infection. Guidelines based on expert opinion or on unsystematic literature searches have been criticised as introducing bias or not being consistent with up-to-date medical knowledge. The published literature on the subject proved to be scarce, and few high-hierarchical, well-planned studies, such as meta-analyses or adequately powered randomised controlled trials, were available.

Acknowledgements

The Delphi survey instrument was developed by INSERM UMR-S 707 research unit and modified by ORIG.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • Identifying essential infection control competencies for newly graduated nurses: A three-phase study in Australia and Taiwan

    2014, Journal of Hospital Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    Data for rating the importance of each competency area were rated on a four-point scale (irrelevant, not very important, somewhat important, very important). In studies using the Delphi technique, it is radical to define ‘consensus’ a priori.25 In this study, consensus for each item of infection control competencies was established as ≥80% of panellists grading it as 4 or 5 for applicability and importance.26

  • A Short-Term, Multicomponent Infection Control Program in Nursing Homes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

    2012, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
    Citation Excerpt :

    At baseline, the director of the facility or the local stakeholder completed a paper form describing the organizational attributes of the facility and the availability of resources. An anonymous paper-form 5- or 10-question tool based on consensual recommendations14 was distributed by project workers to the personnel (physicians and caregivers) present in the facility on the day of survey. The data were collected by the project workers (previously trained) who visited each NH at 2-week intervals, with the assistance of the local stakeholder (medical coordinator or nurse), using a secure online tool developed in the PHP-MySQL environment by the ORIG research unit.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text