Guidelines for infection control in nursing homes: a Delphi consensus web-based survey
Introduction
Endemic and epidemic infections with distinct epidemiology in the current fast-growing elderly population are a major issue in nursing homes (NHs).1 Indeed, residents in NHs are uniquely vulnerable to infection risk because of the long-term-confined environment in which they socialise and live, colonisation by multidrug-resistant micro-organisms (MDROs), physiological changes, underlying diseases, invasive devices, polypharmacy and loss of independence.2 In addition, cross-infections within facilities are promoted by the difficulty of diagnosing infections because of atypical clinical presentation and cognitive impairment in the elderly, limited access to laboratories or radiology, low levels of physician input or unfavourable nurse:patient ratios. Moreover, the transfer of residents between acute care and NHs contributes to the transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).3 As a result, infections in these settings contribute to high morbidity and mortality rates, increased hospital transfers, outbreaks, antimicrobial use and additional costs.4
Evidence concerning infection control principles in NHs proved to be scanty or lacking, which may usually be ascribable to studies’ feasibility. Hospital infection control guidelines are difficult to apply to NHs in view of the differences between these settings.3 Thus, using a web-based Delphi technique, we aimed to collect opinions of a panel of experts to establish and widely disseminate consensus recommendations for infection control in elderly people living in NHs.5
Section snippets
Methods
The research group was led by an investigative group of six specialists in the fields of infectious disease, geriatrics, public health and infection control composed of the Geriatric Infection Risk Monitoring Organization’s (ORIG) committee members and chaired by the chairman of the French Society of Hospital Hygiene (SFHH).4 Four distinct sets of guidelines for infection control in NHs were developed: standard precautions (Topic 1); general non-specific measures for HAI prevention (Topic 2);
Results
The flow chart (Figure 2) describes the participants and recommendations. The ICC was 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.95–0.97) and 0.97 (0.96–0.98) for the first and second rounds respectively. Overall, 20 experts dropped out, limiting the experts’ group to 81 for the first round and 79 for the second round. The overall participation rate was 75%. A total of 79 raters rated ≥10% of items. Of the original 301 recommendations, 264 were retained and classified as follows: 240 items reached
Discussion
Developing evidence-based prevention and control guidelines is a core component for protecting NH residents from infection. Guidelines based on expert opinion or on unsystematic literature searches have been criticised as introducing bias or not being consistent with up-to-date medical knowledge. The published literature on the subject proved to be scarce, and few high-hierarchical, well-planned studies, such as meta-analyses or adequately powered randomised controlled trials, were available.
Acknowledgements
The Delphi survey instrument was developed by INSERM UMR-S 707 research unit and modified by ORIG.
References (12)
- et al.
Prospective surveillance for healthcare-associated infections in German nursing home residents
J Hosp Infect
(2005) - et al.
Cluster randomised controlled trial of an infection control education and training intervention programme focusing on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nursing homes for older people
J Hosp Infect
(2010) - et al.
Effectiveness of bundled behavioural interventions to control healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review of the literature
J Hosp Infect
(2007) Scabies and pediculosis
Lancet
(2000)- et al.
SHEA/APIC guideline: infection prevention and control in the long-term care facility, July 2008
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
(2008) - et al.
Infections in nursing homes: is it time to revise the McGeer criteria?
J Am Geriatr Soc
(2010)
Cited by (20)
Identifying essential infection control competencies for newly graduated nurses: A three-phase study in Australia and Taiwan
2014, Journal of Hospital InfectionCitation Excerpt :Data for rating the importance of each competency area were rated on a four-point scale (irrelevant, not very important, somewhat important, very important). In studies using the Delphi technique, it is radical to define ‘consensus’ a priori.25 In this study, consensus for each item of infection control competencies was established as ≥80% of panellists grading it as 4 or 5 for applicability and importance.26
A Short-Term, Multicomponent Infection Control Program in Nursing Homes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
2012, Journal of the American Medical Directors AssociationCitation Excerpt :At baseline, the director of the facility or the local stakeholder completed a paper form describing the organizational attributes of the facility and the availability of resources. An anonymous paper-form 5- or 10-question tool based on consensual recommendations14 was distributed by project workers to the personnel (physicians and caregivers) present in the facility on the day of survey. The data were collected by the project workers (previously trained) who visited each NH at 2-week intervals, with the assistance of the local stakeholder (medical coordinator or nurse), using a secure online tool developed in the PHP-MySQL environment by the ORIG research unit.
Burden of infections among 44,869 elderly in nursing homes: A cross-sectional cluster nationwide survey
2011, Journal of Hospital InfectionGuide of recommendations for the prevention of social and health infection in nursing homes
2024, Farmaceuticos ComunitariosInfection control in long term care institutions for the elderly: A reflection document on the situation in Spain
2023, Revista Espanola de Quimioterapia