Elsevier

Journal of Hepatology

Volume 68, Issue 4, April 2018, Pages 754-763
Journal of Hepatology

Research Article
Usefulness of biochemical remission and transient elastography in monitoring disease course in autoimmune hepatitis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Complete biochemical remission is a reliable surrogate of low histological disease activity.

  • Transient elastography is a non-invasive tool to monitor fibrosis development in autoimmune hepatitis.

  • These study results may improve treatment monitoring in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

  • Patients with autoimmune hepatitis have a high chance of fibrosis regression if inflammation is suppressed.

Background & Aims

Liver fibrosis regression but also progression may occur in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) under treatment. There is a need for non-invasive surrogate markers for fibrosis development in AIH to better guide immunosuppressive treatment. The aims of the study were to assess the impact of complete biochemical remission defined as normalisation of aminotransferases and IgG on histological activity and fibrosis development, and the value of repeat transient elastography (TE) measurement for monitoring disease progression in AIH.

Methods

A total of 131 liver biopsies from 60 patients with AIH and more than 900 TE from 125 patients with AIH, 130 with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and 100 with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), were evaluated. Time intervals between TE were at least 12 months. Patients with AIH were treated for at least six months at first TE.

Results

In contrast to PBC and PSC, a decrease of liver stiffness (LS) was observed in the whole group of patients with AIH (−6.2%/year; 95% CI −12.6% to −0.2%; p = 0.04). The largest decrease of LS was observed in patients with severe fibrosis at baseline (F4: −11.7%/year; 95% CI −19% to −3.5%; p = 0.006). Complete biochemical remission was strongly linked to regression of LS (“remission”: −7.5%/year vs. “no remission”: +1.7%/year, p <0.001). Similarly, complete biochemical remission predicted low histological disease activity and was the only independent predictor for histological fibrosis regression (relative risk 3.66; 95% CI 1.54–10.2; p = 0.001). Patients with F3/F4-fibrosis, who remained in biochemical remission showed a considerable decrease of fibrosis stage (3.7 ± 0.5 to 1.8 ± 1.7; p = 0.007) on histological follow-up.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that complete biochemical remission is a reliable predictor of a good prognosis in AIH and leads to fibrosis regression that can be monitored by TE.

Lay summary

Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammatory disease of the liver, which often progresses to cirrhosis if left untreated or in the case of insufficient treatment response. Current guidelines have defined biochemical remission (normalisation of biochemical markers for liver inflammation) as a major goal in the treatment of AIH. However, data on the prognostic relevance of this definition are scarce. Herein, we demonstrate that the current definition of biochemical remission is a reliable surrogate for low disease activity on histological assessment and for a beneficial long-term disease course. In addition, we establish transient elastography, a non-invasive ultrasound-based method of measuring scarring of liver tissue, as a reliable tool to monitor disease course in AIH.

Introduction

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic disease, which harbours a significant risk of fibrosis progression when treatment is insufficient.[1], [2] Some patients may progress despite immunosuppressive treatment.[3], [4] Therefore, AIH patients require close, life-long follow-up. In daily practice, treatment monitoring is mainly guided by biochemical surrogate markers for hepatic inflammation. Besides serum aminotransferases, it has been demonstrated that selectively elevated IgG levels also indicate ongoing inflammatory activity in AIH.5 Therefore, complete biochemical remission has been defined as repeatedly normal serum aminotransferase and IgG levels. Although the prognostic relevance of this definition is uncertain, current treatment guidelines have incorporated this definition as the goal of immunosuppressive treatment in AIH.[6], [7], [8] Since complete biochemical remission is hard to achieve in some patients and requires high doses of immunosuppressants in others, it is important to validate the prognostic significance of this definition.

Monitoring treatment response and disease progression by biochemical markers may have limitations, since a proportion of patients may display relevant inflammatory activity on liver histology despite normal biochemical markers.[4], [5] In addition, AIH is characterised by a fluctuating disease course, which may mask repeated flares and disease progression if laboratory values are controlled infrequently. Therefore, although not generally recommended by current guidelines, many experts perform follow-up liver biopsies to assess inflammatory activity and disease progression. However, liver biopsies are invasive procedures bearing a residual risk of severe complications and are of limited acceptance among patients.

Therefore, non-invasive surrogate markers of disease progression are urgently needed to better guide immunosuppressive treatment. We have recently validated liver stiffness (LS) measurement by transient elastography (TE) as a non-invasive tool to assess liver fibrosis in treated AIH.9 TE is currently the only validated non-invasive method to estimate liver fibrosis in AIH with a reliable accuracy and reproducibility.[9], [10] In the cholestatic autoimmune liver diseases, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), it could be demonstrated that changes in LS are strongly linked with disease progression and outcome.[11], [12], [13] However, there are no data assessing progression rates of LS in AIH.

Hence, we aimed i) to validate complete biochemical remission as a surrogate of histological remission and development of liver fibrosis, and ii) to assess the value of repeat TE for monitoring disease progression in AIH.

Section snippets

Patients

All patients were regularly followed-up at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) between July 2004 and December 2015. Data on clinical, biochemical and histological features were collected prospectively in a database and analysed retrospectively.

The research protocol was approved by the local ethical committee (PV4081).

Diagnostic criteria

Autoimmune Hepatitis. AIH was diagnosed by clinical, biochemical, serological and histopathological findings consistent with the recent EASL practice guidelines.8 All

Baseline characteristics of AIH patients with follow-up liver biopsies: AIH cohort I

A total of 60 patients who had undergone 131 liver biopsies were considered eligible. Median follow-up between liver biopsies was 5.6 years (range: 1.2–20).

Liver biopsies were performed at presentation, prior to treatment withdrawal after reaching remission, to evaluate treatment failure, or to rule out differential diagnoses.

Follow-up time of the total cohort of patients with follow-up biopsies was 10.6 years (range 3.8–24.6), only two patients with poor treatment response developed de novo

Discussion

As this study demonstrates achieving biochemical remission in AIH is a relevant treatment target. Probably the most relevant: Biochemical remission proved to be at least as good, if not a better predictor of fibrosis regression than histological remission. In addition, we herein establish TE as non-invasive means to monitor disease progression in patients with AIH. Furthermore, the different dynamics of LS development between the three autoimmune liver diseases AIH, PBC and PSC are demonstrated

Financial support

The authors received no financial support to produce this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest that pertain to this work.

Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details.

Authors’ contributions

Johannes Hartl: First and corresponding author, substantial contribution to the design, data acquisition and analysis, interpretation of data, drafting of the article. Ehlken Hanno: Data acquisition and critical revision. Sebode Marcial: Data acquisition and critical revision. Zenouzi Roman, Peiseler Moritz, Weiler-Normann Christina: Data acquisition and manuscript revision. Krech Till: Histological evaluation of liver specimens. von Felden Johann: Critical revision, technical support, data

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Katja Fuessel and Irena Schulz who have performed the liver stiffness measurements, Claudia Glaubke who helped with data acquisition, Eik Vettorazzi for helping with the statistics. The project was supported by “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” (DFG SFB841), “YAEL Foundation” and “Helmut and Hannelore Greve Foundation”.

References (27)

  • I.M. Murray-Lyon et al.

    Controlled trial of prednisone and azathioprine in active chronic hepatitis

    Lancet

    (1973)
  • R.D. Soloway et al.

    Clinical, biochemical, and histological remission of severe chronic active liver disease: a controlled study of treatments and early prognosis

    Gastroenterology

    (1972)
  • A.J. Czaja et al.

    Progressive fibrosis during corticosteroid therapy of autoimmune hepatitis

    Hepatology

    (2004)
  • H.K. Dhaliwal et al.

    Long-term prognostic significance of persisting histological activity despite biochemical remission in autoimmune hepatitis

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2015)
  • S. Lüth et al.

    Serologic markers compared with liver biopsy for monitoring disease activity in autoimmune hepatitis

    J Clin Gastroenterol

    (2008)
  • M.P. Manns et al.

    Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

    Hepatology

    (2010)
  • D. Gleeson et al.

    British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for management of autoimmune hepatitis

    Gut

    (2011)
  • EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Autoimmune hepatitis

    J Hepatol

    (2015)
  • J. Hartl et al.

    Transient elastography in autoimmune hepatitis: Timing determines the impact of inflammation and fibrosis

    J Hepatol

    (2016)
  • Q. Xu et al.

    Evaluation of transient elastography in assessing liver fibrosis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

    J Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2017)
  • C. Corpechot et al.

    Noninvasive elastography-based assessment of liver fibrosis progression and prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

    Hepatology

    (2012)
  • C. Corpechot et al.

    Assessment of biliary fibrosis by transient elastography in patients with PBC and PSC

    Hepatology

    (2006)
  • C. Corpechot et al.

    Baseline values and changes in liver stiffness measured by transient elastography are associated with severity of fibrosis and outcomes of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

    Gastroenterology

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    These authors contributed equally to the manuscript and share senior authorship.

    View full text