Elsevier

Journal of Hepatology

Volume 59, Issue 5, November 2013, Pages 1029-1036
Journal of Hepatology

Research Article
Radiation lobectomy: Time-dependent analysis of future liver remnant volume in unresectable liver cancer as a bridge to resection

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2013.06.015Get rights and content

Background & Aims

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a standard technique for patients not amenable to liver resection due to small future liver remnant ratio (FLR). Radiation lobectomy (RL) with 90Y-loaded microspheres (Y90) is hypothesized to induce comparable volumetric changes in liver lobes, while potentially controlling the liver tumor and limiting tumor progression in the untreated lobe. We aimed at testing this concept by performing a comprehensive time-dependent analysis of liver volumes following radioembolization.

Methods

83 patients with right unilobar disease with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; N = 67), cholangiocarcinoma (CC; N = 8) or colorectal cancer (CRC; N = 8) were treated by Y90 RL. The total liver volume, lobar (parenchymal) and tumor volumes, FLR and percentage of FLR hypertrophy from baseline (%FLR hypertrophy) were assessed on pre- and post-Y90 CT/MRI scans in a dynamic fashion.

Results

Right lobe atrophy (p = 0.003), left lobe hypertrophy (p <0.001), and FLR hypertrophy (p <0.001) were observed 1 month after Y90 and this was consistent at all follow-up time points. Median %FLR hypertrophy reached 45% (5–186) after 9 months (p <0.001). The median maximal %FLR hypertrophy was 26% (−14→86). Portal vein thrombosis was correlated to %FLR hypertrophy (p = 0.02). Median Child-Pugh score worsening (6→7) was seen at 1 to 3 months (p = 0.03) and 3 to 6 months (p = 0.05) after treatment. Five patients underwent successful right lobectomy (HCC N = 3, CRC N = 1, CC N = 1) and 6 HCCs were transplanted.

Conclusions

Radiation lobectomy by Y90 is a safe and effective technique to hypertrophy the FLR. Volumetric changes are comparable (albeit slightly slower) to PVE while the right lobe tumor is treated synchronously. This novel technique is of particular interest in the bridge-to-resection setting.

Introduction

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a standard technique for patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies not amenable to liver resection due to small future liver remnant expressed as a percentage ratio of the whole liver volume (FLR). The aim of the procedure is to induce contralateral hypertrophy by redirecting the portal blood flow, thereby leading to an increased ratio of FLR. The range of cut-off ratios of the remnant liver varies from 20% (normal) to 40% (cirrhotic) [1], [2], [3]. However, some authors highlight the limitations of PVE, citing a concern for progression of untreated disease and an increased rate of contralateral metastases while time elapses during the hypertrophy process; this is potentially related to pro-angiogenic factors [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].

Promisingly, radiation lobectomy (RL), defined as the transarterial lobar infusion of 90Y-loaded microspheres (Y90), is suspected to induce similar or superior volumetric changes in liver lobes, but potentially offer the concomitant advantage of controlling the liver tumor and limiting tumor progression in the tumor-naïve (and untreated) left lobe by limiting the rate of portal blood flow diversion [9]. This “atrophy-hypertrophy complex” suggests lobar Y90 radioembolization as an alternate procedure to PVE as bridge to liver resection.

The goal of this study was to confirm the changes of embolized and unembolized liver volumes and FLR after lobar radioembolization. Additional goals included assessing long-term sequelae of RL (change in Child-Pugh score), assessing clinical factors predictive of %FLR hypertrophy, control of tumor in the treated lobe, and development of new tumor in the untreated radiation-naïve left lobe.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Between 2003 and 2012, 700 patients were treated with radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases or cholangiocarcinoma (CC) in a lobar manner. In general, HCC, CC, and CRC patients with unilobar right lobe disease and no metastases were evaluated for surgical options during weekly multidisciplinary tumor board. Patients not candidates for immediate resection were considered for RL given the 3 theoretical advantages of this concept over PVE:

Patient sample

83 patients without extrahepatic disease were treated by right radiation lobectomy (non-selective) using Y90 microspheres for unilobar HCC, CRC or CC. There were 66 males and 17 females with a median age of 68 (range: 36–89). The primary disease was HCC (N = 67, 9 infiltrative), CRC (N = 8, 4 synchronous, 3 metachronous, 1 unknown) and CC (N = 8). The underlying liver disease in cirrhotic patients (N = 47) was attributed to HCV (N = 24), HBV (N = 7), alcohol (N = 6), autoimmune (N = 1) or primary biliary

Volumetric analysis and predictive variables

This is the first description of a dynamic and time-dependent analysis of the volumetric changes in liver lobes and FLR after radioembolization. The right lobe shrinkage and the left lobe hypertrophy confirm, in this analysis, the linear time-dependent hypertrophy of the FLR, not related to tumor burden volumetric change (“atrophy-hypertrophy complex”). The FLR was found to be greater in patients with HCC and CC compared to CRC, and in patients with CP scores ⩾7. Those observations could

Conclusions

Radiation lobectomy by Y90 is a safe and effective technique to increase FLR. Volumetric changes (atrophy-hypertrophy complex) are comparable to (albeit at a slower kinetic) PVE, while the right lobe tumor is treated synchronously. From a bridge-to-resection perspective, these combined effects could optimize patient selection, maximize FLR, and incorporate a valuable test-of-time before resection. These would help identify patients that would benefit most from surgery, thereby improving

Financial support

There was no funding provided for this study. RS is supported in part by NIH grant CA126809.

Conflict of interest

LK, RJL, MFM, and RS are advisors to Nordion. None of the other authors have any conflict of interest.

The underlying research reported in the study was funded by the NIH Institutes of Health.

References (24)

  • J. Belghiti et al.

    Portal vein occlusion prior to extensive resection in colorectal liver metastasis: a necessity rather than an option!

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2009)
  • V. Pamecha et al.

    Long-term survival and disease recurrence following portal vein embolisation prior to major hepatectomy for colorectal metastases

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text