Research ArticleRadiation lobectomy: Time-dependent analysis of future liver remnant volume in unresectable liver cancer as a bridge to resection
Introduction
Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a standard technique for patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies not amenable to liver resection due to small future liver remnant expressed as a percentage ratio of the whole liver volume (FLR). The aim of the procedure is to induce contralateral hypertrophy by redirecting the portal blood flow, thereby leading to an increased ratio of FLR. The range of cut-off ratios of the remnant liver varies from 20% (normal) to 40% (cirrhotic) [1], [2], [3]. However, some authors highlight the limitations of PVE, citing a concern for progression of untreated disease and an increased rate of contralateral metastases while time elapses during the hypertrophy process; this is potentially related to pro-angiogenic factors [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].
Promisingly, radiation lobectomy (RL), defined as the transarterial lobar infusion of 90Y-loaded microspheres (Y90), is suspected to induce similar or superior volumetric changes in liver lobes, but potentially offer the concomitant advantage of controlling the liver tumor and limiting tumor progression in the tumor-naïve (and untreated) left lobe by limiting the rate of portal blood flow diversion [9]. This “atrophy-hypertrophy complex” suggests lobar Y90 radioembolization as an alternate procedure to PVE as bridge to liver resection.
The goal of this study was to confirm the changes of embolized and unembolized liver volumes and FLR after lobar radioembolization. Additional goals included assessing long-term sequelae of RL (change in Child-Pugh score), assessing clinical factors predictive of %FLR hypertrophy, control of tumor in the treated lobe, and development of new tumor in the untreated radiation-naïve left lobe.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Between 2003 and 2012, 700 patients were treated with radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases or cholangiocarcinoma (CC) in a lobar manner. In general, HCC, CC, and CRC patients with unilobar right lobe disease and no metastases were evaluated for surgical options during weekly multidisciplinary tumor board. Patients not candidates for immediate resection were considered for RL given the 3 theoretical advantages of this concept over PVE:
Patient sample
83 patients without extrahepatic disease were treated by right radiation lobectomy (non-selective) using Y90 microspheres for unilobar HCC, CRC or CC. There were 66 males and 17 females with a median age of 68 (range: 36–89). The primary disease was HCC (N = 67, 9 infiltrative), CRC (N = 8, 4 synchronous, 3 metachronous, 1 unknown) and CC (N = 8). The underlying liver disease in cirrhotic patients (N = 47) was attributed to HCV (N = 24), HBV (N = 7), alcohol (N = 6), autoimmune (N = 1) or primary biliary
Volumetric analysis and predictive variables
This is the first description of a dynamic and time-dependent analysis of the volumetric changes in liver lobes and FLR after radioembolization. The right lobe shrinkage and the left lobe hypertrophy confirm, in this analysis, the linear time-dependent hypertrophy of the FLR, not related to tumor burden volumetric change (“atrophy-hypertrophy complex”). The FLR was found to be greater in patients with HCC and CC compared to CRC, and in patients with CP scores ⩾7. Those observations could
Conclusions
Radiation lobectomy by Y90 is a safe and effective technique to increase FLR. Volumetric changes (atrophy-hypertrophy complex) are comparable to (albeit at a slower kinetic) PVE, while the right lobe tumor is treated synchronously. From a bridge-to-resection perspective, these combined effects could optimize patient selection, maximize FLR, and incorporate a valuable test-of-time before resection. These would help identify patients that would benefit most from surgery, thereby improving
Financial support
There was no funding provided for this study. RS is supported in part by NIH grant CA126809.
Conflict of interest
LK, RJL, MFM, and RS are advisors to Nordion. None of the other authors have any conflict of interest.
The underlying research reported in the study was funded by the NIH Institutes of Health.
References (24)
- et al.
Measurement of liver volume and hepatic functional reserve as a guide to decision-making in resectional surgery for hepatic tumors
Hepatology
(1997) - et al.
Enhanced tumor growth after portal vein embolization in a rabbit tumor model
J Surg Res
(2013) - et al.
Research reporting standards for radioembolization of hepatic malignancies
J Vasc Interv Radiol
(2011) - et al.
Radioembolization with 90Yttrium microspheres: a state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies: part 1: technical and methodologic considerations
J Vasc Interv Radiol
(2006) Errors in the topographic diagnosis of liver diseases
Ann Chir
(2002)Early detection and curative treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2005)- et al.
Calculation of child and adult standard liver volume for liver transplantation
Hepatology
(1995) - et al.
The segments of the hepatic veins-is there a spatial correlation to the Couinaud liver segments?
Eur J Radiol
(2005) - et al.
Chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity and surgery for colorectal liver metastases
Br J Surg
(2007) - et al.
Optimal future liver remnant in patients treated with extensive preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases
Ann Surg Oncol
(2013)