Asthma and lower airway disease
Standardized quality (SQ) house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy tablet (ALK) reduces inhaled corticosteroid use while maintaining asthma control: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.019Get rights and content

Background

Investigations meeting current standards are limited for the effect of house dust mite (HDM) allergy immunotherapy in asthmatic patients.

Objective

This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of a standardized quality (SQ; allergen standardization method proprietary to the trial sponsor) HDM SLIT-tablet (ALK, Hørsholm, Denmark) in adults and adolescents with HDM respiratory allergic disease. This publication reports the results of the endpoints related to asthma.

Methods

Six hundred four subjects 14 years or older with HDM allergic rhinitis and mild-to-moderate asthma were randomized 1:1:1:1 to double-blind daily treatment with one of 3 active doses (1, 3, or 6 SQ-HDM) or placebo. Their use of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) was standardized and adjusted at baseline and the end of treatment to the lowest dose providing asthma control. The primary end point was a reduction in ICS dose from the individual subject's baseline dose after 1 year of treatment.

Results

The primary analysis revealed a mean difference between 6 SQ-HDM and placebo in the reduction in daily ICS dose of 81 μg (P = .004). Relative mean and median reductions were 42% and 50% for 6 SQ-HDM and 15% and 25% for placebo, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed for the other assessed asthma parameters, reflecting the intended controlled status of the trial subjects. The most common adverse events were local reactions in the mouth. The rate and severity of adverse events were higher for 3 and 6 SQ-HDM than for 1 SQ-HDM and placebo.

Conclusion

Efficacy in mild-to-moderate asthma of 6 SQ-HDM relative to placebo was demonstrated by a moderate statistically significant reduction in the ICS dose required to maintain asthma control. All active doses were well tolerated.

Section snippets

Ethics

The trial is identified by EudraCT number 2006-001795-20 and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00389363. The trial was designed, approved, consented to, and conducted according to the principles of ICH Good Clinical Practice.17

Intervention medication

The tablets (active and placebo) were manufactured and provided by the sponsor and were oral lyophilisates, either containing standardized extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae in a 1:1 ratio or a placebo that was similar in appearance,

Trial population

Subject disposition is summarized in Table I. The full analysis set (FAS) comprised 604 randomized subjects. Eighty-eight percent completed the trial, evenly distributed over treatment groups. The rate of AE discontinuations was numerically slightly higher for 3 SQ-HDM than for the other treatment groups.

Demographic and selected baseline characteristics are summarized in Fig 2. All parameters were generally similar between treatment groups, and baseline body characteristics were within the

Discussion

The trial was double-blinded, and no indications of generally compromised blinding were present during the trial. It has previously been discussed whether the occurrence of local side effects with SLIT-tablets could potentially compromise blinding.35 An analysis of data pooled from 4 clinical trials investigating the effect of an SQ grass SLIT-tablet in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis has been conducted. The data were pooled to ensure sufficient power of the subgroup analyses, and

References (42)

  • G. Ciprandi et al.

    Minimal persistent inflammation is present at mucosal level in patients with asymptomatic rhinitis and mite allergy

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (1995)
  • V. Bauchau et al.

    Prevalence and rate of diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in Europe

    Eur Respir J

    (2004)
  • M. Masoli et al.

    Global burden of asthma

    Allergy

    (2004)
  • T.B. Knudsen et al.

    A population-based clinical study of allergic and non-allergic asthma

    J Asthma

    (2009)
  • M. Zureik et al.

    Sensitisation to airborne moulds and severity of asthma: cross sectional study from European Community respiratory health survey

    BMJ

    (2002)
  • A. Linneberg et al.

    The link between allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma: a prospective population-based study. The Copenhagen Allergy Study

    Allergy

    (2002)
  • J. Bousquet et al.

    WHO Position Paper. Allergen immunotherapy: Therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases

    Allergy

    (1998)
  • J. Bousquet et al.

    Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA(2)LEN and AllerGen)

    Allergy

    (2008)
  • S.R. Durham et al.

    Long-term clinical efficacy of grass-pollen immunotherapy

    N Engl J Med

    (1999)
  • L. Jacobsen et al.

    Specific immunotherapy has long-term preventive effect of seasonal and perennial asthma: 10-year follow-up on the PAT study

    Allergy

    (2007)
  • S.R. Durham et al.

    SQ-standardized sublingual grass immunotherapy: confirmation of disease modification 2 years after 3 years of treatment in a randomized trial

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2012)
  • Cited by (235)

    • Allergen Immunotherapy for Asthma

      2024, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
    • Advancing precision medicine in asthma: Evolution of treatment outcomes

      2023, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Sponsored by ALK-Abelló, Hørsholm, Denmark, who assumes overall responsibility for the trial and has been involved in both trial design and conduct.

    Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: H. Mosbech has received consultancy fees for help in preparation of protocol, has received support for travel to European congresses and international allergologic and pulmonologic congresses, is an advisory board member, and has received lecture fees for postgraduate educational activities on allergologic topics from ALK-Abelló. F. de Blay has received research support, consultancy fees, travel support, and participation fees from ALK-Abelló; is a board member for and has received consultancy fees from Novartis, Boehringer, Stallergenes, and Meda Pharma; has received research support from AstraZeneca; and has received lecture fees from Novartis, Stallergenes, Meda Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, and MSD. L. Prieto Andres is a board member for GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Stallergenes and has received lecture fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis. C. Ljørring is employed by and has stock/stock options in ALK-Abelló. G. W. Canonica has received research support from ALK-Abelló, Almirall, Allergy Therapeutics, Allergopharma, Anallergo, HAL, Lofarma, and Stallergenes. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

    View full text