Clinical Research
Interventional Cardiology
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Radial or Femoral Approach in a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial: The STEMI-RADIAL Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1651Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Objectives

This study sought to compare radial and femoral approaches in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by high-volume operators experienced in both access sites.

Background

The exact clinical benefit of the radial compared to the femoral approach remains controversial.

Methods

STEMI-RADIAL (ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction treated by RADIAL or femoral approach) was a randomized, multicenter trial. A total of 707 patients referred for STEMI <12 h of symptom onset were randomized in 4 high-volume radial centers. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of major bleeding and vascular access site complications at 30 days. The rate of net adverse clinical events (NACE) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding/vascular complications. Access site crossover, contrast volume, duration of intensive care stay, and death at 6 months were secondary endpoints.

Results

The primary endpoint occurred in 1.4% of the radial group (n = 348) and 7.2% of the femoral group (n = 359; p = 0.0001). The NACE rate was 4.6% versus 11.0% (p = 0.0028), respectively. Crossover from radial to femoral approach was 3.7%. Intensive care stay (2.5 ± 1.7 days vs. 3.0 ± 2.9 days, p = 0.0038) as well as contrast utilization (170 ± 71 ml vs. 182 ± 60 ml, p = 0.01) were significantly reduced in the radial group. Mortality in the radial and femoral groups was 2.3% versus 3.1% (p = 0.64) at 30 days and 2.3% versus 3.6% (p = 0.31) at 6 months, respectively.

Conclusions

In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI by operators experienced in both access sites, the radial approach was associated with significantly lower incidence of major bleeding and access site complications and superior net clinical benefit. These findings support the use of the radial approach in primary PCI as first choice after proper training. (Trial Comparing Radial and Femoral Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] [STEMI-RADIAL]; NCT01136187)

Key Words

coronary intervention
radial approach
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Abbreviations and Acronyms

MI
myocardial infarction
NACE
net adverse clinical event(s)
PCI
percutaneous coronary intervention
STEMI
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Cited by (0)

This study was supported by the Czech Republic Ministry of Health for conceptual development of research organization 00669806, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic, and by the Charles University Research Fund (project no. P36). Data analysis was supported by the International Chair on Interventional Cardiology and Transradial Approach, established at Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. All authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Preliminary results of this study have been presented during late-breaking clinical sessions at Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2012 (October 26, 2012, Miami, Florida).