Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 35, Issue 3, March 2012, Pages 435-439
Gait & Posture

Evaluation of immediate impact of cane use on energy expenditure during gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to assess the immediate impact of cane use on energy expenditure during gait in patients with knee OA analyzing VO2.

Methods

An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out on 64 symptomatic patients with a diagnosis of knee OA. The assessment of energy expenditure was performed through an analysis of expired gases using the portable K4 apparatus (Cosmed, Model K4 b2, Italy) during the six-min walk test (6MWT). Two tests were performed with a cane and two without a cane on two different days within a seven-day period.

Results

The patients walked farther on the test without the cane (p < 0.001). Oxygen expenditure (VO2) and the O2 cost of walking at the end of the 6MWT increased approximately 50% and 80% during cane-assisted gait when compared to gait without the use of a cane (p < 0.001). Pain (Borg scale) decreased approximately 20% at the end of the 6MWT with cane-assisted gait in comparison to gait without a cane (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Cane use causes an immediate increase in energy expenditure (VO2) during gait and O2 cost of walking and an immediate decrease of pain during gait. It is necessary to do a more prolonged follow up in order to assess the impact of daily cane use on energy expenditure among these patients and determine whether adaptation occurs. Furthermore, it is necessary to study whether daily cane use has a positive impact on important parameters in these patients, such as pain, function and quality of life.

Highlights

► We assessed the immediately impact of cane use in patients with OA. ► The energy expenditure and walking cost were immediately increased. ► Pain decreased during gait while using the cane for the first time.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint diseases worldwide [1]. The evolution of OA is slow and leads to joint stiffness, progressive deformity and loss of function, thereby affecting quality of life [2]. The knee is the most commonly affected weight-supporting joint and knee OA can result in functional disability [3].

In healthy individuals, weight load occurs in both the medial and lateral compartments of the knees. During the midstance phase of gait, about 60–80% of the load is distributed through the medial compartment of the knee, which is one of the reasons knee OA frequently involves this compartment [4]. Varus deformity may occur in knee OA and contribute toward the progression of the disease by causing increased load to the medial compartment of the knee, with subsequent damage to the articular cartilage and subchondral bone in this area [5]. Thus, alleviating weight load in both compartments and especially in medial compartment should be one of the aims of treatment with such patients [6].

Rehabilitation professionals often recommend the use of a cane to decrease weight load and pain on the joints of the lower limbs when walking [7]. The literature suggests that the use of a cane reduces joint stress, increases tolerance to exercise and enhances the independence of individuals with OA; the cane also helps the contralateral side, which is often overloaded [8]. In patients with knee OA, a cane should be used on the contralateral side to the affected knee, thereby reducing the length of peak adduction and making gait more efficient [6], [9].

Gait alterations in patients with knee OA may occur as a result of muscle weakness, pain, deformity and instability. Thus, balance during gait is affected, with a subsequent increase in energy expenditure, which, in turn, accentuates fatigue [10]. One study assessed energy expenditure in paraplegic individuals (incomplete injury at the C6 to L2 level) during gait with a walker or crutches and demonstrated less energy expenditure with the use of crutches than the walker [11]. However, both crutches and walkers require greater energy expenditure than normal gait. Studies on healthy individuals using a cane have also demonstrated an increase in energy expenditure when compared to normal gait [12], [13].

We only encountered one study addressing energy expenditure during cane-assisted gait in patients with knee OA, the aim of which was to determine whether differences in cane length affect energy expenditure during gait. Cane-assisted gait was shown to require greater energy expenditure than normal gait and a cane reaching the distal fold of the wrist was the length that caused the least impact on energy expenditure. However, the study used heart rate to estimate energy expenditure [14]. No studies were found assessing energy expenditure during cane-assisted gait in individuals with knee OA through an analysis of oxygen expenditure (VO2).

The aim of the present study was to assess the immediate impact of cane use on energy expenditure during gait in patients with knee OA by analyzing VO2. The hypothesis was that using a cane for the first time would lead to an increase in oxygen expenditure during gait when compared to gait without the use of a cane.

Section snippets

Design overview

An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out on 64 symptomatic patients with a diagnosis of knee OA based on the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology [15], with scores of 3–7 on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain in the previous week. The study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Brazil) and participants provided informed consent.

Setting and participants

The patients could have unilateral or bilateral knee OA. The cane was used on the

Results

Eighty-nine percent of the patients were women and 11% were men. The mean age of the sample was 61.7 years. Table 1 displays the descriptive data on the sample. Regarding the test order randomization, 35 patients performed the test with cane first and 29 started with the test without the cane.

Table 2 displays the mean and standard deviation of the values obtained on the 6MWT with and without the cane as well as the statistical significances value encountered using the paired t-test. The

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to investigate the immediate impact of cane use on energy expenditure during gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The results demonstrate that patients with knee OA using a cane for the first time expend considerably greater energy during walking. This increased energy expenditure is believed to be related to the greater muscle recruitment needed for the use of the cane as well as reduced gait efficiency. However, this is merely speculation, as the present

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by grants provided by FAPESP (2003/087536).

References (34)

  • S.F. Sun et al.

    Hyaluronate improves pain, physical function and balance in the geriatric osteoarthritic knee: a 6-month follow-up study using clinical tests

    Osteoarthritis Cartilage

    (2006)
  • R. Mullis et al.

    Crutch length: effect on energy cost and activity intensity in non-weight-bearing ambulation

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (2000)
  • C. Cooper

    Osteoarthritis: epidemiology and classification

  • W.J. Rejeski et al.

    Physical activity and quality of life in older adults

    J Gerontol A: Biol Sci Med Sci

    (2001)
  • C.J. Louzada

    Osteoarthritis: clinical features

  • F. Johnson et al.

    The distribution of load across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic measurements

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1980)
  • R. Cerejo et al.

    The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of disease

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2002)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Accuracy evaluation of a method to partition ground reaction force and center of pressure in cane-assisted gait using an instrumented cane with a triaxial force sensor

      2018, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gait assistive devices, such as a cane, are often prescribed to improve balance in walking gait for elderly individuals [1–3] and hemiplegic patients [4–7], as well as to reduce loading (force and moment) of the lower limb for patients with gait disorders such as knee osteoarthritis [8–10] and total knee or hip replacement patients [11].

    • The effects of real and artificial Leg Length Discrepancy on mechanical work and energy cost during the gait

      2018, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, musculoskeletal pathology may alter our ability to move, disturbing gait, increasing energy costs and, consequently, reducing our autonomy. For example, the use of walking cane in patients with knee osteoarthritis has been observed to cause an increase in energy expenditure during walking [2]. Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD), whether or not linked to a pathological process, is one of the most frequent musculoskeletal conditions encountered in clinical practice.

    • Effects of differences in visual acuity on gait time and trunk acceleration when older women negotiate stairs

      2016, European Geriatric Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, accelerometers have become widely used in gait analyses [16], evaluations of balance [17,18], and measurements of energy expenditure [19,20]. The advantages of an accelerometer are its small size, good measurement accuracy, and low cost compared with the older equipment used in motion analysis [20]. In addition, the smoothness of trunk acceleration (i.e., the upper-to-lower trunk acceleration ratio) can be used to assess whole-trunk movement, and (independently) to measure physical performance [16,21].

    • Lateral trunk lean gait modification increases the energy cost of treadmill walking in those with knee osteoarthritis

      2014, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Additionally, Caldwell et al.15 investigated the metabolic costs of other gait modifications such as toe-out walking and a medial shift of the foot (‘walking with the knees closer together’), and showed that toe-out walking required the least amount of energy compared to the other gait modifications. Similar increases in HR to the 5.9% increase in this study have been reported with new cane use in those with knee OA19,27. Importantly, VO2 during normal walking observed in the present study was similar to a previous study of energy expenditure during walking in people with knee OA.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text