Elsevier

Foot and Ankle Clinics

Volume 17, Issue 4, December 2012, Pages 647-663
Foot and Ankle Clinics

Treatment of the Arthritic Valgus Ankle

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2012.08.007Get rights and content

Section snippets

Ankle Alignment

The alignment of the hindfoot can be divided into 3 anatomic aspects: supramalleolar, tibiotalar (orientation of the line of the tibiotalar joint), and inframalleolar.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 The medial distal tibial angle (MDTA) is used to quantify supramalleolar alignment. In a radiographic study9 it measured 92.4 ± 3.1° (range 88–100°) and in a cadaver study it measured 93.3 ± 3.2° (range 88–100°).10 The mortise view should be used for measurements of the MDTA because it depends on

Treatment options in the arthritic valgus ankle

Patients with an arthritic valgus ankle should be individually assessed and all concomitant pathologic conditions should be considered and addressed if necessary. Examples include: deltoid ligament insufficiency, dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon, contracted heel cord, osseous deformities and/or defects of the distal tibia, shortening and/or deformity of the fibula, and inframalleolar deformities. Given the wide range of potential concomitant pathologic conditions, a generic approach

Literature review: TAR experience in patients with valgus deformity

The first clinical report addressing the feasibility and clinical outcomes of TAR recognized preoperative varus or valgus deformity as a possible source of prosthesis failure. Newton93, 94 performed 50 TAR procedures using the Newton Ankle Implant (a nonconstrained cemented prosthesis including high density polyethylene tibial and Vitallium talar components). Valgus or varus deformity of the talus greater than 20° was noted as an absolute contraindication for TAR.93, 94 In a later study,95

Summary

A clinically and radiologically well-aligned hindfoot and proper position of prosthesis components are the keys to long-term prosthesis stability and reliable functional outcomes in patients who undergo TAR. In patients with preoperative coronal deformities (valgus or varus), alignment and biomechanics should be restored. Our clinic typically strives to obtain a medial distal tibial angle of 90° and neutral inframalleolar alignment (as assessed using the Saltzman view). A moderate preoperative

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (127)

  • A. Barg et al.

    Subtalar and naviculocuneiform fusion for extended breakdown of the medial arch

    Foot Ankle Clin

    (2011)
  • B.E. Cohen et al.

    Medial column procedures in the acquired flatfoot deformity

    Foot Ankle Clin

    (2007)
  • M. Knupp et al.

    Triple arthrodesis

    Foot Ankle Clin

    (2011)
  • A. Nihal et al.

    Ankle arthrodesis

    Foot Ankle Surg

    (2008)
  • B. Hintermann et al.

    Total ankle replacement

    Foot Ankle Clin

    (2003)
  • A.K. Sands et al.

    Lateral column lengthening

    Foot Ankle Clin

    (2007)
  • B. Hintermann

    Medial ankle instability

    Foot Ankle Clin

    (2003)
  • K.T. Lee et al.

    Perioperative complications of the MOBILITY total ankle system: comparison with the HINTEGRA total ankle system

    J Orthop Sci

    (2010)
  • J.M. Schuberth et al.

    Perioperative complications of the Agility total ankle replacement in 50 initial, consecutive cases

    J Foot Ankle Surg

    (2006)
  • J.C. Coetzee

    Management of varus or valgus ankle deformity with ankle replacement

    Foot Ankle Clin

    (2008)
  • S.F. Conti et al.

    Complications of total ankle replacement

    Foot Ankle Clin

    (2002)
  • P. Vienne et al.

    OSG-Totalendoprothese Agility: Indikationen, Operationstechnik und Ergebnisse

    FussSprungg

    (2004)
  • V. Valderrabano et al.

    Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2009)
  • C.L. Saltzman et al.

    Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consecutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopaedic center

    Iowa Orthop J

    (2005)
  • M. Knupp et al.

    Orthopade

    (2006)
  • H.B. Kitaoka et al.

    Three-dimensional analysis of normal ankle and foot mobility

    Am J Sports Med

    (1997)
  • M. Glazebrook et al.

    Comparison of health-related quality of life between patients with end-stage ankle and hip arthrosis

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2008)
  • M. Horisberger et al.

    Posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis after ankle-related fractures

    J Orthop Trauma

    (2009)
  • A. Frigg et al.

    Does alignment in the hindfoot radiograph influence dynamic foot-floor pressures in ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal fusion?

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2010)
  • A. Frigg et al.

    Clinical relevance of hindfoot alignment view in total ankle replacement

    Foot Ankle Int

    (2010)
  • M. Knupp et al.

    The surgical tibiotalar angle: a radiologic study

    Foot Ankle Int

    (2005)
  • V.T. Inman

    The joints of the ankle

    (1976)
  • S.A. Stufkens et al.

    Measurement of the medial distal tibial angle

    Foot Ankle Int

    (2011)
  • M. Backer et al.

    Passive ankle mobility. Clinical measurement compared with radiography

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1989)
  • P. Buck et al.

    The optimum position of arthrodesis of the ankle. A gait study of the knee and ankle

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1987)
  • P.L. Wood et al.

    A randomised, controlled trial of two mobile-bearing total ankle replacements

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2009)
  • C.L. Saltzman et al.

    The hindfoot alignment view

    Foot Ankle Int

    (1995)
  • V. Valderrabano et al.

    Orthopade

    (2011)
  • M. Brinker

    Review of orthopaedic trauma

    (2001)
  • J.E. Johnson et al.

    Hindfoot coronal alignment: a modified radiographic method

    Foot Ankle Int

    (1999)
  • M. Miller

    Review of orthopaedics

    (2004)
  • R.H. Thomas et al.

    Ankle arthritis

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2003)
  • G.I. Pagenstert et al.

    Realignment surgery as alternative treatment of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2007)
  • Y. Takakura et al.

    Results of opening-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of a post-traumatic varus deformity of the ankle

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1998)
  • E.D. Stamatis et al.

    Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of distal tibial angular deformities and arthritis of the ankle joint

    Foot Ankle Int

    (2003)
  • J.A. Buckwalter et al.

    The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2004)
  • J.A. Buckwalter et al.

    Joint injury, repair, and remodeling: roles in post-traumatic osteoarthritis

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2004)
  • D.T. Felson

    Risk factors for osteoarthritis: understanding joint vulnerability

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2004)
  • T.O. McKinley et al.

    Pathomechanic determinants of posttraumatic arthritis

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2004)
  • S.J. Steffensmeier et al.

    Effects of medial and lateral displacement calcaneal osteotomies on tibiotalar joint contact stresses

    J Orthop Res

    (1996)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Joint Preserving Surgery for Valgus Ankle Osteoarthritis

      2022, Foot and Ankle Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      In JPS, it is very important to appropriately analyze the etiology and biomechanics of the case since neglecting or not recognizing all pathobiomechanical issues might deteriorate the condition and lead to end-stage ankle OA in the long-term.4,5 Valgus ankle OA can be classified based on the clinical etiology, level of deformity, severity, and tissue initiating the deformity (eg, bone, ligament, muscle, or combined).2,3,6 Regarding the clinical etiology grouping, the most common cause of ankle OA is posttraumatic (80% of cases) and often due to lower leg fractures.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have nothing to disclose.

    View full text