European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Profile of chromosomal aberrations in different gestational age spontaneous abortions detected by comparative genomic hybridization
Introduction
It has been estimated that 10–15% of all clinically recognized pregnancies terminate with spontaneous abortions (SAs). Cytogenetic studies have revealed that fetal chromosome abnormalities account for about 50% of first trimester and near 30% of second trimester pregnancy losses. Most of these abnormalities are numerical chromosomal aberrations (86%) and a low percentage are structural chromosomal aberrations (6%) or other, including chromosome mosaicism (8%) [1]. Chromosome abnormalities are of meiotic or mitotic origin. The most common cause of aneuploidy is non-disjunction during meiosis. The resulting gamete either lacks a chromosome or has two copies of it, producing a monosomic or trisomic zygote, respectively. When non-disjunction occurs after fertilization (mitotic non-disjunction), one expects to see mosaicism. Karyotypes, obtained from oocytes indicate that 20–25% of these cells have missing or extra chromosomes, while the frequency of aneuploidy in the sperm cells is 3–4% [2], [3].
According to the observations of Sandalinas et al. the cells with haploidy, polyploidy (5n), monosomy (other than X or 21), multiple trisomy (in most but not all instances) and severe structural chromosome rearrangements would not survive cell cycle control beyond the eight-cell stage: lethal stage. Cells with single and some with multiple trisomy, monosomy 21, sex chromosomal aneuploidy, less severe structural chromosome rearrangements, tetraploidy and triploidy were assumed to survive cell cycle control and keep their ability of cell division: viable cells [4]. Qualitative or (semi)quantitative models for cause and effects of chromosomal abnormalities during pregnancy are scare. The “audit of trisomy 16 in man” [5] is an example of a detailed quantitative model confined to one specific chromosome (chromosome 16).
The presence of chromosomal abnormality in miscarriages explains the reason for the pregnancy loss [6]. Traditionally, the detection of chromosomal aberration in fetal tissues is performed by conventional cytogenetic methods. These methods rely on obtaining viable and dividing cells, tissue culturing, and harvesting metaphase chromosomes for analysis. Limitations may be due to macerated or fragmented samples from pregnancy loss, external contamination, culture failure and selective growth of maternal cells in long-term cultures of chorionic stroma [7].
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique, which can detect aneuploidies-numerical and unbalanced structural chromosomal abnormalities. The CGH technique involves the simultaneous hybridization of genomic test and reference DNA, each labelled with a different fluorescent dye, to normal target metaphase chromosomes. By comparing the relative intensities of the two fluorophores along the length of each target chromosome, variations in DNA copy number between the test and reference genomes can be detected. Unlike conventional cytogenetic analysis, CGH analysis does not depend on dividing cells and can be employed anytime DNA is available. In the last years the CGH-array analysis has proven to become a powerful new molecular cytogenetic technique that allows genomewide analysis of DNA copy number [8], [9].
A limited number of CGH analyzes have been performed on spontaneous abortions. In 1998, Daniely et al. published data on 27 SAs investigated by CGH, where chromosomal aberrations were found in 48% of the samples [10]. In the study of Lomax et al. including 253 SAs and Barett et al. including 368 SAs, chromosome defects were established in 53% of the cases [11], [12]. Highest rate of chromosomal changes (72%) was found in spontaneously aborted human specimens that had failed to grow in culture (72%) [13].
To further enrich the data we present the profile of chromosomal aberrations in miscarriages, detected by CGH in Bulgaria.
Section snippets
Sample collection
Samples included materials from 106 SAs (83 first- and 23 second trimester abortions) with history of advanced maternal age (20.4% of the women were 35 years old or higher), repeated pregnancy loss (0.9%), phenotypic abnormalities of the embryo or foetus (17.9%), infertility problems (1.9%), or retroplacental hematoma, detected by ultrasonography (5.7%). The remaining cases did not belong to any of the above-mentioned groups (53.2%).
The samples were obtained by residua abrasions from the
Results
The CGH analysis revealed 37.7% overall frequency of chromosomal aberrations (40 out of 106 cases), distributed as follows: 82.5% numerical aberrations (aneuploidy 47.5%, monosomy X 25.0% and hyperdiploidy 10.0%) and 17.6% structural aberrations (Table 1, Table 2).
With regard to the clinical appearance, highest frequency of aberrations was detected in the blighted ovum specimens (62.5%) compared to missed (36.0%) and second trimester SAs (34.8%) (Table 3).
Numerical aberrations were found in 50%
Comment
Detection of aneuploidies in SAs is especially important for reproductive counseling. The presence of an aneuploidy requires prenatal diagnosis in the future pregnancies, because of possible unbalanced segregations associated with advanced maternal age or balanced structural rearrangements.
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) represents an alternative molecular cytogenetic technique capable of detecting chromosomal imbalances by reverse fluorescence in situ hybridization. As the technique
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grant of the Ministry of Education and Science—Upgrading of Research Infrastructure no. 05/01.08.2005.
References (27)
- et al.
Genetic aspects of miscarriage
Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
(2000) - et al.
Trisomy in humans: incidence, origin and etiology
Curr Opin Genet Dev
(1993) - et al.
Cytogenetic diagnosis of “normal 46, XX” karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading
Fertil Steril
(1999) - et al.
Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages
Am J Hum Genet
(2004) - et al.
Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions
Am J Hum Genet
(2000) Chromosome abnormalities in human reproductive wastage
Trends Genet
(1986)- et al.
Analysis of structural and numerical chromosome abnormalities in sperm of normal men and carriers of constitutional chromosome aberrations: a review
Hum Genet
(1997) - et al.
Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage
Hum Reprod
(2001) An audit of trisomy 16 in man
Prenatal Diagn
(1995)Clinical significance of morphologic and genetic examination of spontaneously aborted embryos
Am J Reprod Immunol
(1998)
Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro
Prenatal Diagn
Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization
Hum Reprod
Comparative genomic hybridization: a new tool for reproductive pathology
Arch Pathol Lab Med
Cited by (33)
19q13.33→qter trisomy in a girl with intellectual impairment and seizures
2014, Meta GeneCitation Excerpt :Chromosomal alterations are rare and usually incompatible with life. It has been described that 4.2% of the chromosomal abnormalities found in miscarriages involve 19q, most of them in trisomic state and only one case presenting monosomy (Azmanov et al., 2007). In fact, the chromosome 19, which is one of the smallest human chromosomes, is the third in number of genes, making its imbalance more damaging (Grover et al., 2004).
Prevalence of aneuploidies in products of spontaneous abortion: Interest of FISH and MLPA
2014, MorphologieCitation Excerpt :This rate is lower than the 30–40% suggested by previous studies [15–17]. This can be explained by the fact that we have not tested all the chromosomal abnormalities involved in SA, including aneuploidies of chromosomes 16 and 22 that are relatively common in products of SA [17]. Of the 10 cases with abnormality, six are the result of early pregnancy loss (before 12th week of gestation), which confirms the hypothesis that most cases with abnormal karyotype, especially those with trisomies, abort early during pregnancy [18].
Copy number variations in patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: an array-CGH approach
2022, Turkish Journal of Medical SciencesAttitude and perceptions toward miscarriage: a survey of a general population in Japan
2020, Journal of Human Genetics