Profile of chromosomal aberrations in different gestational age spontaneous abortions detected by comparative genomic hybridization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.037Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To determine the frequency and type of chromosomal aberrations in different gestational age spontaneous abortions.

Study design

In the study, 106 spontaneous abortions (SAs) were studied by comparative genomic hybridization.

Results

The frequency of detected chromosomal aberrations was 37.7%. Numerical chromosomal aberrations were disclosed in 82.5% of the aberrant cases, while structural chromosomal aberrations-in 17.5%. Highest frequency of aberrations was detected in the blighted ovum specimens (62.5%) compared to missed and second trimester SAs (respectively, 36.0% and 34.8%). With regard to structural aberrations, the difference in the frequencies between blighted ovum specimens and second trimester SAs nearly reached statistical significance (p = 0.0847). However, due to the low number of blighted ovum specimens analyzed (n = 8), this result should be interpreted with due caution. The most frequently affected chromosomal arms were Xp and Xq (13.7% of aberrant chromosomal arms, each), followed by 16p (8.4%), 16q (8.4%), 15q (4.2%) and 19q (4.2%).

Conclusions

We describe for the first time a profile of chromosomal aberrations in SAs from different gestational ages, detected by CGH. Our results showed highest frequency of chromosome aberrations in blighted ovum specimens compared to other types of spontaneous abortions, higher rate of structural aberrations than reported before (17.5%) and some aberrations that so far were not found by CGH.

Introduction

It has been estimated that 10–15% of all clinically recognized pregnancies terminate with spontaneous abortions (SAs). Cytogenetic studies have revealed that fetal chromosome abnormalities account for about 50% of first trimester and near 30% of second trimester pregnancy losses. Most of these abnormalities are numerical chromosomal aberrations (86%) and a low percentage are structural chromosomal aberrations (6%) or other, including chromosome mosaicism (8%) [1]. Chromosome abnormalities are of meiotic or mitotic origin. The most common cause of aneuploidy is non-disjunction during meiosis. The resulting gamete either lacks a chromosome or has two copies of it, producing a monosomic or trisomic zygote, respectively. When non-disjunction occurs after fertilization (mitotic non-disjunction), one expects to see mosaicism. Karyotypes, obtained from oocytes indicate that 20–25% of these cells have missing or extra chromosomes, while the frequency of aneuploidy in the sperm cells is 3–4% [2], [3].

According to the observations of Sandalinas et al. the cells with haploidy, polyploidy (5n), monosomy (other than X or 21), multiple trisomy (in most but not all instances) and severe structural chromosome rearrangements would not survive cell cycle control beyond the eight-cell stage: lethal stage. Cells with single and some with multiple trisomy, monosomy 21, sex chromosomal aneuploidy, less severe structural chromosome rearrangements, tetraploidy and triploidy were assumed to survive cell cycle control and keep their ability of cell division: viable cells [4]. Qualitative or (semi)quantitative models for cause and effects of chromosomal abnormalities during pregnancy are scare. The “audit of trisomy 16 in man” [5] is an example of a detailed quantitative model confined to one specific chromosome (chromosome 16).

The presence of chromosomal abnormality in miscarriages explains the reason for the pregnancy loss [6]. Traditionally, the detection of chromosomal aberration in fetal tissues is performed by conventional cytogenetic methods. These methods rely on obtaining viable and dividing cells, tissue culturing, and harvesting metaphase chromosomes for analysis. Limitations may be due to macerated or fragmented samples from pregnancy loss, external contamination, culture failure and selective growth of maternal cells in long-term cultures of chorionic stroma [7].

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique, which can detect aneuploidies-numerical and unbalanced structural chromosomal abnormalities. The CGH technique involves the simultaneous hybridization of genomic test and reference DNA, each labelled with a different fluorescent dye, to normal target metaphase chromosomes. By comparing the relative intensities of the two fluorophores along the length of each target chromosome, variations in DNA copy number between the test and reference genomes can be detected. Unlike conventional cytogenetic analysis, CGH analysis does not depend on dividing cells and can be employed anytime DNA is available. In the last years the CGH-array analysis has proven to become a powerful new molecular cytogenetic technique that allows genomewide analysis of DNA copy number [8], [9].

A limited number of CGH analyzes have been performed on spontaneous abortions. In 1998, Daniely et al. published data on 27 SAs investigated by CGH, where chromosomal aberrations were found in 48% of the samples [10]. In the study of Lomax et al. including 253 SAs and Barett et al. including 368 SAs, chromosome defects were established in 53% of the cases [11], [12]. Highest rate of chromosomal changes (72%) was found in spontaneously aborted human specimens that had failed to grow in culture (72%) [13].

To further enrich the data we present the profile of chromosomal aberrations in miscarriages, detected by CGH in Bulgaria.

Section snippets

Sample collection

Samples included materials from 106 SAs (83 first- and 23 second trimester abortions) with history of advanced maternal age (20.4% of the women were 35 years old or higher), repeated pregnancy loss (0.9%), phenotypic abnormalities of the embryo or foetus (17.9%), infertility problems (1.9%), or retroplacental hematoma, detected by ultrasonography (5.7%). The remaining cases did not belong to any of the above-mentioned groups (53.2%).

The samples were obtained by residua abrasions from the

Results

The CGH analysis revealed 37.7% overall frequency of chromosomal aberrations (40 out of 106 cases), distributed as follows: 82.5% numerical aberrations (aneuploidy 47.5%, monosomy X 25.0% and hyperdiploidy 10.0%) and 17.6% structural aberrations (Table 1, Table 2).

With regard to the clinical appearance, highest frequency of aberrations was detected in the blighted ovum specimens (62.5%) compared to missed (36.0%) and second trimester SAs (34.8%) (Table 3).

Numerical aberrations were found in 50%

Comment

Detection of aneuploidies in SAs is especially important for reproductive counseling. The presence of an aneuploidy requires prenatal diagnosis in the future pregnancies, because of possible unbalanced segregations associated with advanced maternal age or balanced structural rearrangements.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) represents an alternative molecular cytogenetic technique capable of detecting chromosomal imbalances by reverse fluorescence in situ hybridization. As the technique

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant of the Ministry of Education and Science—Upgrading of Research Infrastructure no. 05/01.08.2005.

References (27)

  • M. Benkhalifa et al.

    Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro

    Prenatal Diagn

    (2005)
  • M. Daniely et al.

    Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization

    Hum Reprod

    (1998)
  • I.J. Barrett et al.

    Comparative genomic hybridization: a new tool for reproductive pathology

    Arch Pathol Lab Med

    (2001)
  • Cited by (33)

    • 19q13.33→qter trisomy in a girl with intellectual impairment and seizures

      2014, Meta Gene
      Citation Excerpt :

      Chromosomal alterations are rare and usually incompatible with life. It has been described that 4.2% of the chromosomal abnormalities found in miscarriages involve 19q, most of them in trisomic state and only one case presenting monosomy (Azmanov et al., 2007). In fact, the chromosome 19, which is one of the smallest human chromosomes, is the third in number of genes, making its imbalance more damaging (Grover et al., 2004).

    • Prevalence of aneuploidies in products of spontaneous abortion: Interest of FISH and MLPA

      2014, Morphologie
      Citation Excerpt :

      This rate is lower than the 30–40% suggested by previous studies [15–17]. This can be explained by the fact that we have not tested all the chromosomal abnormalities involved in SA, including aneuploidies of chromosomes 16 and 22 that are relatively common in products of SA [17]. Of the 10 cases with abnormality, six are the result of early pregnancy loss (before 12th week of gestation), which confirms the hypothesis that most cases with abnormal karyotype, especially those with trisomies, abort early during pregnancy [18].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text