Original ResearchNo change in lymph node positivity rate despite increased lymph node yield and improved survival in colon cancer
Introduction
In the evaluation of quality of care for patients with colon cancer, the number of lymph nodes evaluated has become a surrogate marker for surgical and pathological excellence. Quality initiatives aimed at improving nodal yield have been undertaken in North America and Europe. In the Netherlands, it is measured in different auditing systems and quality registrations.
The focus on nodal yield in colon cancer was fuelled by several non-randomised studies which investigated the relationship between lymph node evaluation and survival. These studies have shown that higher lymph node yield is associated with better survival after colon cancer surgery [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].
Despite the attention for lymph node yield in many studies, the association with nodal positivity rate has not often been articulated. Studies from the US and Canada found that the number of lymph nodes evaluated in colon cancer has increased over the years but the proportion of metastasis containing lymph nodes did not [8], [9]. Two other studies also found no association between the extent of lymph node evaluation and the proportion of lymph node positivity [10], [11].
The aim of this large observational study is to evaluate trends over time in the number of lymph nodes evaluated and in the proportion of positive lymph nodes for patients who underwent resection for stage I–III colon cancer in the Southern Netherlands. More importantly, we investigated whether period of diagnosis is associated with adequate nodal evaluation and node positivity rate after adjusting for patient and tumour characteristics. Furthermore, the impact on relative survival was investigated.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
Data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR), maintained by the Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands, were used. The ECR is a population-based registry that collects data on all newly diagnosed cancer patients in the Southern Netherlands. Information on patient and tumour characteristics, diagnosis and treatment is routinely extracted from the medical records by trained administrators. Anatomical site of the tumour is registered according to the International Classification of
Results
The study population consisted of 8616 patients. From 2000–2002 to 2009–2011, patients’ age at diagnosis increased and patients had more comorbidities. Furthermore, from the first to the last period, fewer patients had low SES but an increasing proportion had unknown SES. Moreover, patients were diagnosed with a lower pathological T category over time. With regard to tumour grade, the proportion of patients with poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumours decreased while the proportion
Discussion
In this study among patients who underwent resection for M0 colon cancer between 2000 and 2011, we identified an increase in (adequate) lymph node yield over time, which is in line with previous research [7], [8], [15], [16] and attributable to a diverse set of measures including increased awareness by pathologists and surgeons, improved communication between pathologists and surgeons and to a smaller extent increased fixation time of the specimens and the use of Patent blue V dye staining [16]
Funding
This work was supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [Grant No. 113102004]. The funding source had no role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the contributing hospitals: Amphia Hospital, Breda; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven; Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond and Deurne; Hospital Bernhoven, Uden; Jeroen Bosch Hospital’s Hertogenbosch; Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven and Veldhoven; St. Anna Hospital, Geldrop; St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg; TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg and Waalwijk; VieCuri Hospital, Venlo and Venray; Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg.
References (37)
- et al.
Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer
Eur J Cancer
(2005) - et al.
Improving lymph node detection in colon cancer in community hospitals and their pathology department in southern Netherlands
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Pathology practice patterns affect lymph node evaluation and outcome of colon cancer: a population-based study
Ann Oncol
(2006) - et al.
Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann Oncol
(2013) - et al.
Prognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: a population-based approach
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
(2005) - et al.
Improved survival of colon cancer due to improved treatment and detection: a nationwide population-based study in The Netherlands 1989–2006
Ann Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review
J Natl Cancer Inst
(2007) - et al.
More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study
Ann Surg
(2006) - et al.
Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089
J Clin Oncol
(2003) - et al.
Lymph node evaluation and long-term survival in Stage II and Stage III colon cancer: a national study
Ann Surg Oncol
(2009)
Clinically important aspects of lymph node assessment in colon cancer
J Surg Oncol
Large variation between hospitals and pathology laboratories in lymph node evaluation in colon cancer and its impact on survival, a nationwide population-based study in the Netherlands
Ann Oncol
Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years
JAMA
Improving nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: so what?
Ann Surg Oncol
Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study
J Surg Oncol
Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer
JAMA
Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3026 patients over a 25-year time period
Ann Surg
Cited by (37)
Examined lymph node numbers influence prognosis in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy
2023, Cancer Pathogenesis and TherapyAdequate lymph node evaluation in the elderly is associated with improved survival in patients with stage I–III colon cancer: A validation study using the National Cancer Data Base
2018, European Journal of Surgical OncologyCitation Excerpt :Subsequent studies have brought this belief into question. More recent studies have shown that despite the increase in lymph node harvest over time and the associated improvement in survival, the rates of node positivity have been unchanged [27,28]. These findings beg the question, what then is the reason for improved survival seen with increasing lymph node yield?
Lymph node size as a simple prognostic factor in node negative colon cancer and an alternative thesis to stage migration
2016, American Journal of SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Recently, O’Shea et al16 reported an increase in investigated LNs over time in a large cohort but no increase in nodal positive cases. The same has been found by others before.17–21 In contrast, Sjo et al found an increase in stage III cases with improved LN retrieval.
Intracorporeal Vessel Ligation in Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Cancer is Associated with Increased Lymph Node Yield
2023, World Journal of SurgeryLymph node yield in colorectal cancer specimens and its impact on pathological staging: Does number matter?
2023, Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics