Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 50, Issue 18, December 2014, Pages 3221-3229
European Journal of Cancer

Original Research
No change in lymph node positivity rate despite increased lymph node yield and improved survival in colon cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.10.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

To analyse trends over time in the number of lymph nodes evaluated and in the proportion of node positivity and to investigate the impact on survival for patients with colon cancer.

Patients and methods

8616 patients resected for M0 colon cancer diagnosed in the Southern Netherlands between 2000 and 2011 were included in this study. Trends in nodal evaluation and node positivity were analysed. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the influence of period of diagnosis on adequate nodal evaluation (⩾12 lymph nodes) and node positivity after adjusting for patient and tumour characteristics. Crude 5-year relative survival was used as an estimate for disease-specific survival.

Results

Overall, the proportion adequate nodal evaluation increased from 13% in 2000–2002 to 59% in 2009–2011 (p < 0.0001), whereas the proportion node positivity remained similar across study periods (approximately 35%). Patients diagnosed in later periods were more likely to have received adequate nodal yield (adjusted Odds ratio (OR) 2009–2011 versus 2000–2002 9.8, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 8.3–11.6). However, the adjusted odds of having node positive disease did not differ between periods of diagnosis. Relative excess risk of dying was independently correlated with the number of lymph nodes evaluated (1–8 LNs versus ⩾12 LNs, N0: 2.2, 95% CI 1.7–2.9; N+: 1.7, 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and period of diagnosis (2009–2011 versus 2000–2002, N+ only: 0.8, 95% CI 0.6–1.0).

Conclusion

The reason for improved survival with increased nodal yield is different from simple understaging as the proportion of lymph node positivity remained constant.

Introduction

In the evaluation of quality of care for patients with colon cancer, the number of lymph nodes evaluated has become a surrogate marker for surgical and pathological excellence. Quality initiatives aimed at improving nodal yield have been undertaken in North America and Europe. In the Netherlands, it is measured in different auditing systems and quality registrations.

The focus on nodal yield in colon cancer was fuelled by several non-randomised studies which investigated the relationship between lymph node evaluation and survival. These studies have shown that higher lymph node yield is associated with better survival after colon cancer surgery [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].

Despite the attention for lymph node yield in many studies, the association with nodal positivity rate has not often been articulated. Studies from the US and Canada found that the number of lymph nodes evaluated in colon cancer has increased over the years but the proportion of metastasis containing lymph nodes did not [8], [9]. Two other studies also found no association between the extent of lymph node evaluation and the proportion of lymph node positivity [10], [11].

The aim of this large observational study is to evaluate trends over time in the number of lymph nodes evaluated and in the proportion of positive lymph nodes for patients who underwent resection for stage I–III colon cancer in the Southern Netherlands. More importantly, we investigated whether period of diagnosis is associated with adequate nodal evaluation and node positivity rate after adjusting for patient and tumour characteristics. Furthermore, the impact on relative survival was investigated.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR), maintained by the Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands, were used. The ECR is a population-based registry that collects data on all newly diagnosed cancer patients in the Southern Netherlands. Information on patient and tumour characteristics, diagnosis and treatment is routinely extracted from the medical records by trained administrators. Anatomical site of the tumour is registered according to the International Classification of

Results

The study population consisted of 8616 patients. From 2000–2002 to 2009–2011, patients’ age at diagnosis increased and patients had more comorbidities. Furthermore, from the first to the last period, fewer patients had low SES but an increasing proportion had unknown SES. Moreover, patients were diagnosed with a lower pathological T category over time. With regard to tumour grade, the proportion of patients with poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumours decreased while the proportion

Discussion

In this study among patients who underwent resection for M0 colon cancer between 2000 and 2011, we identified an increase in (adequate) lymph node yield over time, which is in line with previous research [7], [8], [15], [16] and attributable to a diverse set of measures including increased awareness by pathologists and surgeons, improved communication between pathologists and surgeons and to a smaller extent increased fixation time of the specimens and the use of Patent blue V dye staining [16]

Funding

This work was supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [Grant No. 113102004]. The funding source had no role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the contributing hospitals: Amphia Hospital, Breda; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven; Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond and Deurne; Hospital Bernhoven, Uden; Jeroen Bosch Hospital’s Hertogenbosch; Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven and Veldhoven; St. Anna Hospital, Geldrop; St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg; TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg and Waalwijk; VieCuri Hospital, Venlo and Venray; Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg.

References (37)

  • F.C. Wright et al.

    Clinically important aspects of lymph node assessment in colon cancer

    J Surg Oncol

    (2009)
  • M.A. Elferink et al.

    Large variation between hospitals and pathology laboratories in lymph node evaluation in colon cancer and its impact on survival, a nationwide population-based study in the Netherlands

    Ann Oncol

    (2010)
  • H.M. Parsons et al.

    Association between lymph node evaluation for colon cancer and node positivity over the past 20 years

    JAMA

    (2011)
  • G.A. Porter et al.

    Improving nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: so what?

    Ann Surg Oncol

    (2012)
  • L. Bui et al.

    Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study

    J Surg Oncol

    (2006)
  • S.L. Wong et al.

    Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer

    JAMA

    (2007)
  • International Union against Cancer. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours;...
  • R. Rosenberg et al.

    Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3026 patients over a 25-year time period

    Ann Surg

    (2008)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Adequate lymph node evaluation in the elderly is associated with improved survival in patients with stage I–III colon cancer: A validation study using the National Cancer Data Base

      2018, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Subsequent studies have brought this belief into question. More recent studies have shown that despite the increase in lymph node harvest over time and the associated improvement in survival, the rates of node positivity have been unchanged [27,28]. These findings beg the question, what then is the reason for improved survival seen with increasing lymph node yield?

    • Lymph node size as a simple prognostic factor in node negative colon cancer and an alternative thesis to stage migration

      2016, American Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, O’Shea et al16 reported an increase in investigated LNs over time in a large cohort but no increase in nodal positive cases. The same has been found by others before.17–21 In contrast, Sjo et al found an increase in stage III cases with improved LN retrieval.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text