Review
Optimizing the dose of imatinib for treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Lessons from the phase 3 trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.11.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Imatinib therapy for unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is typically initiated at a dosage of 400 mg/d. Two phase 3 studies investigated whether the higher dose of 800 mg/d – administered initially or upon progression on the 400-mg dose – would improve outcomes. Both the studies confirmed the 400 mg/d starting dose for most patients. However, two groups benefited from the treatment with 800 mg/d of imatinib: patients with disease progression on standard-dose therapy, and patients whose tumour harbours an exon 9 mutation in KIT. Initial treatment with 800 mg/d of imatinib (400 mg BID) should be considered for patients with KIT exon 9–mutant GIST. In unselected patients, dose optimisation to 800 mg/d may be warranted as a first step in managing progressive disease; such patients should be closely monitored.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumour of the gastrointestinal tract, occurring principally in the stomach or small intestine, and occasionally in the colon, rectum or oesophagus.1 GIST accounts for 2% of all gastric tumours, 14% of tumours in the small intestine and 0.1% of those in the colon.2 The annual incidence of GIST estimated from recent population-based studies is 10–15 cases per million persons.3, 4, 5

Approximately 95% of GISTs express KIT (CD117) – a transmembrane tyrosine kinase.6 Under normal circumstances, binding of its ligand (stem-cell factor) promotes KIT dimerisation, enables tyrosine kinase activity, and activates various downstream signalling pathways. Activating KIT gene mutations are present in the large majority of GISTs (80–86%), most commonly (66% of cases) in the juxtamembrane domain (exon 11) of KIT, less frequently (13%) in the extracellular domain (exon 9) and rarely (1%) in the kinase 1 domain (exon 13) or (<1%) activation loop (exon 17).6 These gain-of-function mutations in GISTs lead to ligand-independent constitutive activation of the KIT receptor. In the subset of GISTs without KIT mutations, approximately one-third have activating mutations of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene (PDGFRA, encoding PDGFRα).7 These KIT and PDGFRA mutations are mutually exclusive, but they have similar consequences, causing constitutive activation of the expressed tyrosine kinase, thereby driving intracellular pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival.7, 8

The clinical outcome of patients with advanced GIST was historically poor because this tumour is characteristically resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In a cohort of 288 patients, median survival was 1.4 years for those with metastatic GIST and 3.4 years for those with primary tumours, classified as high-risk disease according to the National Institutes of Health consensus risk stratification.5 Since the introduction of targeted therapy with imatinib, overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic or unresectable GIST has increased markedly, reaching a median of 4.8 years in a pivotal phase 2 study of imatinib therapy for advanced GIST with 64 months of follow-up.9 Imatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a potent and specific activity against KIT and PDGFRα.10

Imatinib is the recommended first-line agent for treatment of unresectable or metastatic GIST and recurrent disease.11, 12, 13 The usual recommended starting dose is 400 mg/d. However, the clinical activity of imatinib in patients with advanced GIST was initially demonstrated in phase 1 and phase 2 studies at doses ranging from 400 mg/d to 1000 mg/d.14, 15, 16, 17 In the phase 1 study, dose-limiting toxicities were noted at the highest dose of 1000 mg/d, the lowest effective dose was 400 mg/d and the recommended dose for phase 2 studies was 800 mg/d. Two intergroup phase 3 studies investigated whether an imatinib dose of 800 mg/d, given initially or upon disease progression on the 400 mg/d dose, would further improve outcomes in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST.

Section snippets

Description of the phase 3 studies

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Italian Sarcoma Group/Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group study 62005 was conducted at 56 study centres in Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore. The North American Intergroup study S0033 was carried out at 57 sites in the United States and Canada.18, 19 These trials enrolled patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic GIST and documented expression of KIT by DAKO immunohistochemical

Comparison of high-dose versus standard-dose imatinib

The European–Australasian study was published after a median follow-up of 760 d,19 and the updated results have appeared in other published articles and abstracts.20, 21, 22 To date, results of the North American study have been presented orally and in published abstracts.18, 23, 24, 25 Patients enrolled in the 2 trials were generally similar (Table 1).

Tumour mutational status and imatinib dose

In the European–Australasian study, pretreatment tumour specimens from 377 patients were analysed for mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 of KIT. Specimens with no detectable KIT mutation were analysed for mutations in PDGFRA exons 12 and 18.32 Activating KIT mutations were detected in 315 of 377 tumours (83.6%), including mutations of exon 11 in 248 (65.8%), exon 9 in 58 (15.4%), exon 13 in 6 (1.6%) and exon 17 in 3 (0.8%). PDGFRA genotyping performed for 62 tumours without activating KIT

Imatinib in KIT-undetectable GIST

Both phase 3 studies required immunohistochemical demonstration of KIT (CD117) positivity as a criterion for patient enrolment. On retrospective central pathology review, 14 patients in the North American trial were found to have KIT-undetectable GISTs.33 Eight of these tumours were genotyped, with mutations in KIT or PDGFRA identified in 4 and 3 specimens, respectively. No difference in response rates was found between the patients with GISTs in which the KIT protein was not detected and those

Imatinib dose and plasma concentration

The rationale for prescribing imatinib at 800 mg/d either for initial treatment of patients with KIT exon 9–mutated GIST or in cases of disease progression at the standard dose in countries where this dose is readily accessible may be that higher blood and tissue concentrations may help overcome the apparent relative resistance of tumours carrying this mutation.34 Plasma imatinib concentration was demonstrated to increase exponentially with increasing imatinib dose per square metre,35 and

Conclusion

Imatinib is effective in more than 80% of patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST when administered at the standard starting dose of 400 mg/d. Phase 3 clinical testing identified 2 groups of patients who clearly benefited from treatment with 800 mg/d. First, approximately one-third of patients whose tumour progressed on the 400-mg initial dose had a partial response or stable disease after a dose increase to 800 mg/d. Second, patients with KIT exon 9 mutations experienced significantly

Conflict of interest statement

S. Patel has received honoraria from Novartis and is a member of the Novartis Speaker’s Bureau. J. Zalcberg has received travel support, honoraria, and clinical and research support as a member of various Novartis advisory boards. J. Zalcberg also was the principal investigator for the EORTC-Australasian Advanced GIST trial in Australia.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the patients and investigators who participated in the clinical trials described in the manuscript. Writing and editorial assistance in the preparation of the manuscript was provided with support from Novartis Oncology. The authors received no honoraria or other financial consideration for their authorship. The authors retained complete editorial control over the content of this manuscript.

References (37)

  • A. Horikoshi et al.

    Relationship between daily dose of imatinib per square meter and its plasma concentration in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)

    Leuk Res

    (2007)
  • M.E. Blackstein et al.

    Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment

    Can J Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • G. D’Amato et al.

    Update on the biology and therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    Cancer Control

    (2005)
  • B. Nilsson et al.

    Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era—a population-based study in western Sweden

    Cancer

    (2005)
  • C.L. Corless et al.

    Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    J Clin Oncol

    (2004)
  • M.C. Heinrich et al.

    PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    Science

    (2003)
  • S. Hirota et al.

    Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors

    Science

    (1998)
  • Byrd DG, Demetri GD, Joensuu H, et al. Evaluation of imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients with large volume...
  • Cited by (41)

    • Oncology phase I trial design and conduct: time for a change - MDICT Guidelines 2022

      2023, Annals of Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In summary, IPDE should be offered (but never mandated) to motivated patients when deemed reasonably safe and will increase the total number of patients treated in the RDR. Multiple RDs: variability by disease, molecular alteration, or tumor site: the RD of a drug may vary within different tumor types (interactions between drug and tumor microenvironment may affect the drug delivery to the tumor bed), by molecular alteration (e.g. an 800 mg QD dose of imatinib is superior to a dose of 400 mg QD in gastrointestinal stromal cancer patients harboring an exon 9 KIT mutation, but not for patients with an exon 11 KIT mutation51), tumor site (e.g. a higher dose of a drug may be necessary to access sanctuary sites), and also route of administration (oral versus intravenous). Separate cohorts within dose escalation or confirmation trials may be required.

    • Primary Retroperitoneal Tumors

      2022, Oncologic Imaging: A Multidisciplinary Approach
    • The analysis of 3-year adjuvant therapy with imatinib in patients with high-risk molecular profiled gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated in routine practice

      2021, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our results may also imply that in very high risk exon 11 KIT mutants longer adjuvant therapy with imatinib may be required. In cases of exon 9 KIT mutants standard 400 mg daily dose is not sufficient, 800 mg daily should be required as it is suggested in metastatic setting [18,19], although this dose has been never tested in clinical trials with adjuvant therapy. Moreover we did not tested the imatinib levels in these patients, since trough level may also correlated to clinical outcomes [20,21].

    • Combined Therapy of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

      2016, Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Current survival in advanced GIST is strikingly superior to historical clinical data, with a reported median overall survival (OS) of 5 to 6 years4,9 and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranging from 2 to 3 years.10–13 In case of progression during imatinib treatment (which is mainly related to occurrence of new secondary KIT/PDGFRA mutations) there are currently several therapeutic strategies, such as escalation of the dose of imatinib to 800 mg daily, surgical removal of focally progressive lesions, and therapy with registered second-line drug sunitinib malate and third-line drug regorafenib (both are multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors with anti-angiogenic properties).14–18 Recently, imatinib has been registered for adjuvant therapy in patients after resection of primary GIST with high risk of recurrence based on the results of 2 randomized trials (ACOSOG Z9001 and Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII = SSGXVIII/AIO).19,20

    • Primary Retroperitoneal Tumors. Anatomy.

      2012, Oncologic Imaging: A Multidisciplinary Approach Expert Consult
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text