ReviewExtracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The State of the Evidence and Framework for Application
Section snippets
Search strategy, data extraction, and quality assessment
To provide an overview of the evidence of ECPR efficacy for OHCA, we (E.G.) designed a search strategy (Supplemental Appendix S1) to identify systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses. From 2005 to May 29, 2017, we searched: MedLine (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane (Wiley), PubMed (National Library of Medicine), and Web of Science (Thomson Reuters), with no language restrictions. We used text words in the title, abstract, or key word fields, and relevant subject indexing to retrieve SRs or
Results
Our systematic search produced 327 citations (Supplemental Appendix S1 and Fig. 1). After screening, we identified 12 SRs, 7 of which were excluded after full text retrieval,4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 leaving 5 included studies.5, 18, 19, 20, 21
Four of the SRs limited study eligibility to those that compared ECPR with conventional resuscitation,18, 19, 20, 21 all including different combinations of 5 studies (Tables 1 and 2; Supplemental Appendixes S2 and S3). The review by Kim et al.19 included
Limitations in current research
Risk of bias resulted in a low or very low quality of evidence for ECPR in refractory OHCA.27 Selection bias by clinicians for ECPR therapy is a major limitation, in addition to significant heterogeneity in the intervention provided and study populations.
Most SRs included studies that compared those treated with ECPR, to those treated exclusively with conventional resuscitation, on the basis of clinical decision. The results of these comparisons are highly dependent on the group chosen to be
ECPR Effectiveness for Refractory OHCA: Completely Obvious or Entirely Unknown?
Previous studies define the limits of survivable CPR duration for patients who meet ECPR criteria, but who are treated exclusively with conventional resuscitation.28, 35 One North American study included 150 EMS agencies over a 3-year period and identified all patients who met an ECPR criteria but were treated with conventional resuscitation.28 The probability of survival showed a continual decline with increasing durations of elapsed resuscitative efforts. The longest duration until ROSC in a
EMS Differences and the Need for a True Denominator
With the exception of reports of ECPR initiated in the prehospital setting,42 the current literature is limited to outcomes of patients who have been transported to the hospital with ongoing CPR. Inclusion in studies has ranged from only those treated with ECPR during active CPR,7 those treated with ECPR after OHCA (some with ROSC),43 to those selected for ECPR (some without initiation because of ROSC or unsuccessful vascular access).6 The most appropriate denominator, however, is the number of
Who Are Ideal Candidates for ECPR?
ECPR deployment is typically highly selective,5, 17 with clinicians treating only patients believed to have the possibility of good outcomes, usually focusing on relatively young healthy patients with short no-flow durations, to minimize the risk of treating those with preceding irreversible cerebral injury. Therefore, our ability to ascertain the best ECPR candidates beyond these highly selected groups is limited. The alternative strategy, a wide application of ECPR resulting in data to
Potential Absolute Benefits
The overall incremental benefit of ECPR to the survivorship in a health region might be modest. One study in Vancouver (population approximately 1 million) reported that 10% of patients with OHCA met the local ECPR criteria, of whom one-third were refractory to conventional resuscitation and thus might have benefited from ECPR (approximately 12 per year).2 This estimate would be lower if restricted to shockable rhythms. A study from Vienna reported that 6% of OHCAs fulfilled their criteria for
Resource Implications and Readiness
OHCA patients treated with ECPR require resource-intensive management, which might not be feasible in all locales. In contrast, OHCA patients who do not have ROSC are pronounced dead in the prehospital setting or in the emergency department, with a relatively low cost. In the prehospital setting, ECPR implementation requires modification of protocols and training, which should seek to achieve the greatest chance of ROSC before transport, while at the same time minimizing delays for ECMO
Donation-Related Considerations
When using advanced resuscitation treatments, the first and foremost priority is saving the patient's life with the goal of neurologically favourable survival. However, although treatment advances have led to improvements in survival, the most common outcome remains death,1 with many patients suffering irreversible anoxic brain injury. Although organ donation has not traditionally been reported in OHCA studies, the 2015 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recommendations
A Framework for ECPR Application
Canadian experience with ECPR for OHCA is limited. Although there have been reports on the use of ECPR for IHCA,51, 52 only 1 study has described the experience with a formal OHCA ECPR protocol.47
Although there are significant limitations in the literature regarding estimates of efficacy, it is highly likely that ECPR after prolonged conventional resuscitation for select patients is superior to conventional resuscitation alone. Nonetheless, acknowledging the state of the evidence, widespread
Conclusion
The incremental benefit and cost-effectiveness of incorporating ECPR into regional OHCA resuscitation systems of care remains unclear. However, it is highly likely that ECPR treatment, in select patients with OHCA refractory to prolonged attempts of conventional resuscitation, is superior to conventional efforts alone. Carefully planned development of ECPR programs in high-performing EMS systems at experienced ECMO centres with the requisite skills, training, and resources might be reasonable
Disclosures
L.H. and S.D.S. are paid consultants for Canadian Blood Services; J.B. has received consulting honoraria and an investigator-initiated research grant from Boston Scientific and Spectranetics; S.C.B. has received a CIHR grant for a national ECPR meeting in Canada. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References (53)
- et al.
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a review of the Japanese literature
Resuscitation
(2011) - et al.
Extracorporeal resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in adults: a systematic review of international practices and outcomes
Resuscitation
(2016) - et al.
Refractory cardiac arrest treated with mechanical CPR, hypothermia, ECMO and early reperfusion (the CHEER trial)
Resuscitation
(2015) - et al.
Assessment of outcomes and differences between in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Favourable survival of in-hospital compared to out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an Italian tertiary care centre experience
Resuscitation
(2012) - et al.
Current and future status of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest
Can J Cardiol
(2017) - et al.
Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients
Ann Thorac Surg
(2014) - et al.
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
(2015) - et al.
Prognostic factors for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation recipients following out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Resuscitation
(2017) - et al.
Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis of 2 260 patients with cardiac arrest
World J Emerg Med
(2017)
Comparing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis
Resuscitation
Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in adults: fundamental principles and systematic review of the evidence
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study
Resuscitation
Extracorporeal life support and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a nationwide registry: a propensity score-matched analysis
Resuscitation
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
J Clin Epidemiol
Prevalence, natural history, and time-dependent outcomes of a multi-center North American cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest extracorporeal CPR candidates
Resuscitation
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is hampered by interruptions in chest compressions–a nationwide prospective feasibility study
Resuscitation
A pre-hospital extracorporeal cardio pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) strategy for treatment of refractory out hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis
Resuscitation
The incidence of “load&go” out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest-candidates for emergency department utilization of emergency-extracorporeal life support. A one-year review
Resuscitation
A 5-year experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation using extracorporeal life support in non-postcardiotomy patients with cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
Comparative outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients managed with Impella microaxial pump or extracorporeal life support
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Resuscitative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for in hospital cardiac arrest: a Canadian observational experience
Resuscitation
Emergency physician-initiated extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Resuscitation
Heart disease and stroke statistics–2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association
Circulation
Potential candidates for a structured Canadian ECPR program for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
CJEM
Recent trends in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States
Circulation
Cited by (0)
See page 153 for disclosure information.