Chest
Evidence-Based MedicineUse of Management Pathways or Algorithms in Children With Chronic Cough: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Section snippets
Summary of Recommendations/Suggestions
1. For children aged ≤ 14 years, we suggest defining chronic cough as the presence of daily cough of at least 4 weeks in duration (Ungraded, Consensus Based Statement).
2. For children aged ≤ 14 years with chronic cough, we suggest that an assessment of the effect of cough on the child and the family be undertaken as part of the clinical consultation (Ungraded, Consensus Based Statement).
3. For children aged ≤ 14 years with chronic cough, we recommend using pediatric-specific cough management
Methods
For the CHEST cough guidelines, it was a priori determined that the age cutoff for pediatric and adult components was 14 years. We used a standard method8 as previously described by Vertigan, et al9: “The methodology used by the CHEST Guideline Oversight Committee to select the Expert Cough Panel Chair and the international panel of experts, perform the synthesis of the evidence and develop the recommendations and suggestions has been published.8, 10 Key questions and parameters of eligibility
Results
The first eight recommendations and/or suggestions were derived from systematic reviews that addressed KQs 1 to 3 summarized in e-Tables 1-3 and e-Figures 1-3.7 The subsequent four recommendations/suggestions were derived from systematic reviews that addressed KQs 4 and 5 (all summarized in e-Tables 4 and 5 and e-Figs 4 and 5).
Areas for Further Research
To advance and improve the management of chronic cough in children, suggested areas of research include the following:
- 1.
Undertake multicenter cohort studies in various clinical settings (community and hospital) that assess the outcomes of children with acute cough that then progresses to chronic cough.
- 2.
Undertake RCTs on the efficacy of cough in various clinical settings, particularly in primary care. When doing so, we suggest that validated cough outcomes, a priori definitions, and “period effect”
Conclusions
In the past decade, the availability of single-center and multicenter studies from several countries has improved the evidence base of the 2006 CHEST Cough Guidelines6 approach. The new recommendations formulated from systematic reviews addressing five KQs were endorsed by the CHEST Expert Cough Panel. Although there is high-quality evidence for some of the new recommendations, many questions remain, particularly in primary care for which there is scarcity of data.
Acknowledgments
Author contributions: A. C., J. O., and R. I. drafted the key questions. A. C. and J. O. selected the studies, extracted data and undertook the bias assessment. A. C. drafted the recommendations and manuscript, had full access to the data and takes responsibility for the integrity of all of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. J. O. and R. I. contributed to the data analyses and interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. B. R. and M. W. critically reviewed the manuscript.
References (48)
- et al.
A multi-centre study on chronic cough in children: burden and etiologies based on a standardized management pathway
Chest
(2012) - et al.
What is the burden of chronic cough for families?
Chest
(2008) - et al.
Use of management pathways or algorithms in children with chronic cough: systematic reviews
Chest
(2016) - et al.
Methodologies for the development of the management of cough: CHEST guideline and expert panel report
Chest
(2014) - et al.
Somatic cough syndrome (previously referred to as psychogenic cough) and tic cough (previously referred to as habit cough) in adults and children: Chest Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Chest
(2015) - et al.
Overview of the management of cough: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Chest
(2014) - et al.
Evaluation and outcome of young children with chronic cough
Chest
(2006) - et al.
Development of a parent-proxy quality-of-life chronic cough-specific questionnaire: clinical impact vs psychometric evaluations
Chest
(2008) - et al.
Evaluation of chronic cough in children
Chest
(2008) - et al.
Children with chronic cough: when is watchful waiting appropriate? Development of likelihood ratios for assessing children with chronic cough
Chest
(2015)
Tools for assessing outcomes in studies of chronic cough: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Chest
Parent cough-specific quality of life: development and validation of a short form
J Allergy Clin Immunol
Children with chronic nonspecific isolated cough
Chest
Do gender and atopy influence cough outcome measurements in children?
Chest
Adenosine bronchial provocation with computerized wheeze detection in young infants with prolonged cough: correlation with long-term follow-up
Chest
Persistent cough in children—overuse of medications
J Paediatr Child Health
Foreign body aspiration: what is the outcome?
Pediatr Pulmonol
Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative
Pediatr Radiol
Guidelines for evaluating chronic cough in pediatrics: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest
British Thoracic Society Guidelines Recommendations for the assessment and management of cough in children
Thorax
The Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand. Position statement. Cough in children: definitions and clinical evaluation
Med J Aust
Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis in childhood: longitudinal growth and lung function
Thorax
PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations
Med Care
Validation of a parent-proxy quality-of-life questionnaire (PC-QOL) for paediatric chronic cough
Thorax
Cited by (0)
DISCLAIMER: American College of Chest Physician guidelines are intended for general information only, are not medical advice, and do not replace professional medical care and physician advice, which always should be sought for any medical condition. The complete disclaimer for this guideline can be accessed at http://www.chestnet.org/Guidelines-and-Resources/Guidelines-and-Consensus-Statements/CHEST-Guidelines.
FUNDING/SUPPORT: The authors have reported to CHEST that no funding was received for this study.