Continuing Care for Adolescents in Treatment for Substance Use Disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2016.06.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Adolescents who enter treatment for substance use often do not complete the recommended program, return to regular use, and do not initiate continuing care services.

  • Assertive approaches (counselor-initiated home or school-based continuing care) increase linkage to continuing care, and rapid initiation of continuing care makes a difference in reducing substance use.

  • Findings suggest that continuing care is appropriate for those who successfully complete treatment.

  • Evidence is accumulating to

Research on adolescent linkage to continuing care services

Despite evidence of the importance of continuing care and the emphasis placed on continuity of care by the American Society of Addiction Medicine and other organizations, most adolescents do not receive these services. Linkage rates to professional continuing care range from 35% to 45% within 90 days of discharge.15, 43 Less than one-half of youth receive a referral for continuing care because they leave treatment early—usually against staff advice or at staff request.53 Reports of linkage

Research on continuing care for adolescents after residential treatment for substance use disorders

Most research on adolescent continuing care has focused on delivery of services after discharge from residential treatment.

Adaptive approaches to continuing care

Because research shows that a large segment of youth who enter treatment do not complete the program and that many do not achieve abstinence or sobriety, it is important to examine continuing care interventions aimed at improving outcomes of poor responders to treatment. Godley and colleagues65 state that, because several episodes of treatment are the rule rather than the exception, noncompletion of services does not necessarily indicate that youth may fail to benefit from continuing care.

Research on other recovery supports for adolescents

Although most randomized studies of adolescent continuing care have investigated professionally provided programs, there has been research with varying levels of rigor into other recovery support services.

Which adolescents benefit most from continuing care?

Existing research with adults and adolescents provides preliminary ideas for which youth might benefit most from particular continuing care services. In the adult literature, when Lynch and colleagues83 compared telephone monitoring plus counseling with treatment as usual with telephone monitoring only, they found that telephone monitoring was more beneficial than treatment as usual for women and participants with lower readiness to change. McKay and colleagues51 discovered that adults with

Summary

Research shows that many adolescents who enter substance use treatment do not complete the program and, after discharge, do not initiate continuing care services. Furthermore, the majority of adolescents will return to some level of substance use either during or after treatment. As youth return to use and problems occur, many will re-enter treatment, and some will do so several times. This pattern of disjointed treatment episodes remains the norm in contemporary practice rather than the

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (88)

  • R.J. Battjes et al.

    Factors that predict adolescent motivation for substance abuse treatment

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2003)
  • H.J.V. Rutherford et al.

    Neurobiology of adolescent substance use disorders: implications for prevention and treatment

    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am

    (2010)
  • K. Humphreys et al.

    Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems: toward evidence-based practice and policy

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2004)
  • M.L. Dennis et al.

    An experimental evaluation of recovery management check-ups (RMC) for people with chronic substance use disorders

    Eval Program Plann

    (2003)
  • M.D. Godley et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of telephone continuing care

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2010)
  • K.C. Winters et al.

    Long-term outcome of substance dependent youth following 12-step treatment

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2007)
  • D.W. Garnick et al.

    Establishing the feasibility of performance measures for alcohol and other drugs

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2002)
  • J.A. Burleson et al.

    Twelve-month follow-up of aftercare for adolescents with alcohol use disorders

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2012)
  • S.H. Godley et al.

    Adolescent outpatient treatment and continuing care: main findings from a randomized clinical trial

    Drug Alcohol Depend

    (2010)
  • P.C. Brown et al.

    Initiation of abstinence in adolescents treated for marijuana use disorders

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2013)
  • J.F. Kelly et al.

    Can 12-step group participation strengthen and extend the benefits of adolescent addiction treatment? A prospective analysis

    Drug Alcohol Depend

    (2010)
  • J.F. Kelly et al.

    How safe are adolescents at Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous meetings? A prospective investigation with outpatient youth

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2011)
  • C. Stanger et al.

    Contingency management approaches for adolescent SUD

    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am

    (2010)
  • J.A. Douglas-Siegel et al.

    The effect of recovery coaches for substance-involved mothers in child welfare: impact on juvenile delinquency

    J Subst Abuse Treat

    (2013)
  • J.P. Ryan et al.

    Recovery coaches and substance exposure at birth

    Child Abuse Negl

    (2008)
  • G.S. Diamond et al.

    Five outpatient treatment models for adolescent marijuana use: a description of the Cannabis Youth Treatment interventions

    Addiction

    (2002)
  • B. Donohue et al.

    Treating adolescent substance abuse using family behavior therapy: a step-by-step approach

    (2012)
  • E.F. Wagner et al.

    School-based group treatment for adolescent substance abuse

  • H.B. Waldron et al.

    Evidence-based psychological treatments for adolescent substance abuse

    J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol

    (2008)
  • K.C. Winters et al.

    Brief intervention for drug-abusing adolescents in a school setting

    Psychol Addict Behav

    (2007)
  • M.D. Godley et al.

    Assertive continuing care for adolescents

  • Y. Kaminer et al.

    Psychotherapies for adolescent substance abusers: short-and long-term outcomes

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (2002)
  • R.J. Williams et al.

    An assertive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome

    Clin Psychol

    (2000)
  • GAIN Coordinating Center

    Briefing book slides on all grantees in the 2012 SAMHSA/CSAT summary analytic file [electronic version]

    (2013)
  • A.T. McLellan et al.

    Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • A.T. McLellan et al.

    Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: from retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring

    Addiction

    (2005)
  • C. Weisner et al.

    Report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on health services research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse

    (2004)
  • W.L. White et al.

    Recovery from addiction and recovery from mental illness: shared and contrasting lessons

  • M.L. Dennis et al.

    Managing addiction as a chronic condition

    Addict Sci Clin Pract

    (2007)
  • W.R. Miller

    What is relapse? Fifty ways to leave the wagon

    Addiction

    (1996)
  • W.L. White et al.

    Addiction as chronic disease: from rhetoric to clinical application

    Alcohol Treat Q

    (2002)
  • F.M. Tims et al.

    Characteristics and problems of 600 adolescent cannabis abusers in outpatient treatment

    Addiction

    (2002)
  • K.C. Winters

    Adolescent brain development and drug abuse

    (2008)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Acute injury mortality and all-cause mortality following emergency department presentation for alcohol use disorder

      2022, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Acute injury deaths also accounted for one-third of all deaths among AUD patients aged 25–44 years. Although these younger patients’ overall mortality rates were lower than those of other age groups, their very high risk for unintentional poisoning, suicide, and homicide underscores the need for greater use of ED-based, evidence-backed overdose, suicide, and violence prevention approaches (Miller et al., 2017), potentially including assertive interventions (e.g., counselor-initiated home or school-based continuing care) for young patients (Passetti et al., 2016). In contrast, the acute injury deaths accounted for only 11% of deaths among patients aged 45–64 years (who made up nearly 40% of the cohort), and just 3% among patients aged ≥ 65 years.

    • Hospitalisation following therapeutic community drug and alcohol treatment for young people with and without a history of criminal conviction

      2022, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nonetheless, future research needs to explore in further detail if a focus on employment, education, and general life skills in programs such as PALM provide health benefits beyond what is obtained from reductions in substance use. Appropriate and well-resourced aftercare also plays an important role in sustaining the long-term benefits of drug and alcohol treatment (Jason et al., 2007; Passetti et al., 2016) and may help explain some of the findings in the current study. All who participate in PALM are offered up to three years of ongoing support via the Continual Adolescent Life Management (CALM) programme.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors have no conflicts of interest.

    Funding: NIH, R01AA021118.

    View full text