- •
The Light criteria serve as a good starting point in the separation of transudates from exudates.
- •
The Light criteria misclassify about 25% of transudates as exudates, and most of these patients are on diuretics.
- •
If a patient is thought likely to have a disease that produces a transudative pleural effusion but the Light criteria suggest an exudate by only a small margin, the serum–pleural fluid protein gradient should be examined.
- •
If this is greater than 3.1 gm/dL, the patient in all probability
The Light Criteria: The Beginning and Why they are Useful 40 Years Later
Section snippets
Key points
The development of the Light criteria
When I was an intern in medicine at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, in 1968 to 1969, there was a period when a large percentage of my patients had a pleural effusion. The chief resident, Dr Richard Winterbauer, made rounds around midnight and always asked me what the thoracentesis revealed. At that time, we routinely measured the cell count and differential, glucose, and protein, and performed smears and cultures on the pleural fluid. I asked Dr Winterbauer the significance of
Why the Light criteria are still useful
The first reference to use the name the Light criteria that I am aware of was published in 1989.7 Since the original publication in 1972, there have been many studies comparing other measurements with the Light criteria for the separation of transudates and exudates, but, in general, the Light criteria have been proved to be better than anything else. I am amazed that, after 40 years, the Light criteria are still being used.
Pleural effusions have classically been divided into transudates and
Transudative effusions misclassified by the Light criteria
When the Light criteria are used, how are those transudative pleural effusions identified that are misclassified? If a patient is clinically suspected of having a transudative effusion but exudative criteria are met by a small margin (protein ratio between 0.5 and 0.65, LDH ratio between 0.6 and 1.0, pleural fluid LDH between two-thirds and the upper normal limit for serum), attempts should be made to determine whether the patient really has a transudative effusion. The 2 main measures that
Summary
The Light criteria serve as a good starting point in the separation of transudates from exudates. The Light criteria misclassify about 25% of transudates as exudates, and most of these patients are on diuretics. If a patient is thought likely to have a disease that produces a transudative pleural effusion but the Light criteria suggest an exudate by only a small margin, the serum–pleural fluid protein gradient should be examined. If this is greater than 3.1 gm/dL, the patient in probably has a
References (35)
- et al.
Diagnostic significance of pleural fluid pH and PCO2
Chest
(1973) - et al.
Cholesterol in pleural effusions: a diagnostic aid
Chest
(1987) - et al.
Cholesterol: a useful parameter for distinguishing between pleural exudates and transudates
Chest
(1991) - et al.
Measurement of pleural fluid cholesterol and lactate dehydrogenase. A simple and accurate set of indicators for separating exudates from transudates
Chest
(1995) - et al.
Relationship between pleural fluid and serum cholesterol levels
Chest
(2001) - et al.
Pleural fluid to serum bilirubin concentration ratio for the separation of transudates from exudates
Chest
(1990) - et al.
A simple laboratory measurement for discrimination of transudative and exudative pleural effusion: pleural viscosity
Respir Med
(2006) - et al.
Increased oxidative stress in exudative pleural effusions: a new marker for the differentiation between exudates and transudates?
Chest
(2005) - et al.
Soluble leukocyte selectin in the analysis of pleural effusions
Chest
(2001) - et al.
Pleural fluid to serum cholinesterase ratio for the separation of transudates and exudates
Chest
(1996)
Evaluation of different criteria for the separation of pleural transudates from exudates
Chest
Comparative analysis of the biochemical parameters used to distinguish between pleural transudates and exudates
Chest
Is it meaningful to use biochemical parameters to discriminate between transudative and exudative pleural effusions?
Chest
Influence of diuretics on the concentration of proteins and other components of pleural transudates in patients with heart failure
Am J Med
Multilevel likelihood ratios for identifying exudative pleural effusion
Chest
Natriuretic peptides BNP and NT-pro-BNP: established laboratory markers in clinical practice or just perspectives
Clin Chim Acta
Measurement of pro-brain natriuretic peptide in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of pleural effusions due to heart failure
Am J Med
Cited by (0)
Disclosures: The author has nothing to disclose related to this publication.