Elsevier

Cancer Epidemiology

Volume 38, Issue 4, August 2014, Pages 435-441
Cancer Epidemiology

Prognostic impact of definitive local therapy of the primary tumor in men with metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis: A population-based, propensity score analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2014.04.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

This study investigated whether definitive local therapy [radical prostatectomy (RP) or brachytherapy (BT)] of the primary tumor improves survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer (PrCA) at diagnosis.

Methods

Data on newly diagnosed metastatic PrCA cases (stage IV, N = 7858) were obtained from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. Conventional multivariable survival analysis and propensity score analysis were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) comparing men who underwent definitive local therapy of the primary tumor to those who did not.

Results

After adjusting for sociodemographic and tumor attributes, having RP after diagnosis with metastatic PrCA was associated with 73% (HR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.20–0.38) lower risk of all-cause mortality and 72% (HR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.20–0.39) reduced risk of death from PrCA. Having BT also was associated with 57% (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.31–0.59) and 54% (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33–0.64) lower risk of all-cause and PrCA-specific mortality. Similar results were observed in propensity score-adjusted analysis as well as when stratified by age and extent of tumor metastasis.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that definitive local therapy improves survival in men with metastatic PrCA at diagnosis. Future work should consider comorbidities, diet, physical activity and smoking status.

Introduction

The optimal treatment for metastatic prostate cancer (PrCA) remains a clinical dilemma. Men diagnosed with metastatic PrCA usually receive systemic therapies, typically androgen ablation and chemotherapy, while definitive local therapy such as radical prostatectomy and radical radiation are often reserved for patients with organ-confined disease [1], [2]. A growing body of work, however, suggests that effective local management of metastatic cancer may suppress systemic disease progression and improve survival [3], [4], [5], [6].

It is often thought that once the cancer has spread beyond the prostate capsule, removal of the prostate tumor or radical radiation to the prostate gland do not improve prognosis of the PrCA patient, but only offers palliative care by alleviating local symptoms and promoting psychological comfort [5], [7], [8], [9]. However, it is biologically plausible that uncontrolled local malignancy may promote progression of metastases and/or act as source for seeding of new tumors, and thus, the longer the primary tumor stays in place, the faster the progression of metastases and higher the risk of new malignancies [10]. Hence, it is reasonable to speculate that definitive local treatment may delay progression of metastases and improve survival in men with metastatic PrCA. Unfortunately, the literature in this area of research is very limited and not entirely consistent ([6], [11], also reviewed in [3], [4], [7]). Aggressive local therapies including complete tumor excision, cytoreduction (debulking), and definitive radiation therapy to the primary tumor are a mainstay for management of other metastatic cancers such as breast [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], ovarian [20], [23], [24], [25], [26] and endometrial [27], [28], [29], [30] cancers. The merits of definitive local therapy in treatment of metastatic PrCA, however, remain controversial [3], [9].

Despite limited evidence of survival benefits, definitive local therapy is occasionally used in the treatment of metastatic PrCA. Therefore, investigations of the survival benefits of this treatment approach could provide further support and guidance for its use in this patient population. Thus, the current study investigated the survival benefits of definitive local therapy, specifically radical prostatectomy and brachytherapy, in men with metastatic PrCA at the time of diagnosis using data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER).

Section snippets

Data source and study population

A population-based, retrospective study was conducted using 2004–2010 SEER data. SEER, the only comprehensive data source for cancer incidence and mortality in the US, was started in 1973 as collaboration between seven central cancer registries in San Francisco-Oakland, Connecticut, metropolitan Detroit, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, and Utah. It was later expanded to include Seattle (Puget Sound), Metropolitan Atlanta, Los Angeles, San Jose-Monterey, Rural Georgia, Alaska, Greater California,

Results

Of the 7858 metastatic PrCA cases, 4318 (55%) had died by last follow-up, of which 3480 (81%) died from PrCA and 838 (19%) died from other causes. Median survival time was 29 months (interquartile range: 17–50 months) for RP group, 31 months (interquartile range: 15–53.5 months) for the BT group, and 17 months (interquartile range: 8–32 months) for NDLT group. Metastatic PrCA patients who underwent RP or BT were significantly less likely to die from PrCA or from other causes as compared to NDLT

Discussion

In this population-based study, definitive local therapy to the primary tumor was associated with reduced risk of death from PrCA and from all causes among men with metastatic PrCA at the time of diagnosis. A consistent trend of reduced risk of death was observed in men who underwent definitive local therapy compared to those who did not using conventional multivariable survival model as well as propensity score analysis. The study also suggests that regardless of age or the extent of tumor

Conclusion

This study suggests that definitive local therapy of the primary tumor may improve survival in men with metastatic PrCA at the time of diagnosis. Considering that the observational nature of the study precludes causal inferences, continued research with randomized controlled trials would strengthen the current findings. Future work should also considered comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, and tobacco use.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper

Financial disclosure

None to report

References (39)

  • J.N. Barlin et al.

    Cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2010)
  • A.S. Mahmoud-Ahmed

    The effect of radiation therapy on brain metastases from endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2001)
  • A. Heidenreich

    EAU guidelines on prostate cancer

    Eur Urol

    (2008)
  • S. Sridharan et al.

    The importance of local control in high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer

    Curr Oncol

    (2012)
  • T. Shimabukuro

    Can docetaxel therapy improve overall survival from primary therapy compared with androgen-deprivation therapy alone in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer? A multi-institutional cooperative study

    Int J Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • E.D. Canby-Hagino

    Local and systemic therapy for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: should the primary tumor be treated?

    Curr Urol Rep

    (2005)
  • A.L. Potosky

    Prostate cancer practice patterns and quality of life: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1999)
  • M. Morrow et al.

    Surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic breast cancer: closing the barn door after the horse has bolted?

    J Clin Oncol

    (2006)
  • M. Oderda

    Debulking surgery in the setting of very high-risk prostate cancer scenarios

    BJU Int

    (2012)
  • Cited by (69)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel: +1 303 246 1723.

    View full text