Elsevier

Atherosclerosis

Volume 269, February 2018, Pages 219-228
Atherosclerosis

Review article
Role of dual lipid-lowering therapy in coronary atherosclerosis regression: Evidence from recent studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.01.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Plasma LDL-C is a central determinant of the progression of the atherosclerotic disease and its complications.

  • Lowering LDL-C by statins in individuals with CAD produces the stabilization and regression of coronary atherosclerosis.

  • Dual lipid-lowering therapy is superior in inducing plaque regression compared with statin monotherapy.

  • Controversies regarding the effect of non-statin agents on plaque composition have to be fully elucidated.

  • The selection process for patients that may benefit from dual lipid-lowering therapy has to be further implemented.

Abstract

Despite recent therapeutic advances, there is an unmet need in cardiovascular disease prevention. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have established that LDL-C lowering, particularly by statin therapy, reduces the progression of coronary atherosclerosis and the risk of coronary events. Insufficient LDL-C reduction and high residual risk in a significant proportion of statin-treated patients signify that additional therapies are required to deliver more effective coronary care. Pharmacological inhibition of cholesterol absorption (with ezetimibe) and PCSK9 activity (with evolocumab or alirocumab) provides potentially useful approaches for the therapeutic modulation of LDL-C metabolism in statin-treated patients. In recent trials, combination strategies involving a statin and non-statin agent (ezetimibe or evolocumab) have been shown to promote coronary atherosclerosis regression and improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk. This review summarizes recent evidence on the effects of dual lipid-lowering therapy on coronary atherosclerosis.

Introduction

Over the past few decades, mortality rates for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction have dramatically decreased thanks to advances in pharmacologic and interventional treatments [1]. Numerous clinical trials have established the importance of lipid-lowering therapy in primary and secondary prevention and highlighted the role of statins, which inhibit cholesterol synthesis and increase the clearance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [2,3], as first-line agents in patients with cardiovascular disease [4,5]. LDL-C is a causal factor in the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic heart disease [6], and coronary plaque regression has a significant positive correlation with LDL-C and non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) reduction [7,8]. High-intensity statin therapy has been demonstrated to reduce LDL-C [4,6] and promote coronary atheroma stabilization [9] and regression [4,[9], [10], [11]] in patients with acute coronary events [7,10] or stable coronary disease [4]. In virtual-histology (VH) study, statin treatment was also associated with changes in atheroma composition, reducing fibro-fatty components and increasing dense calcium volume [12]. However, despite high-intensity statin therapy atherosclerosis continue to progress in up to one-third of patients [13], and there is an unmet need in lipid pharmacotherapy to reduce the “residual risk” of coronary events [14]. Therefore, a multi-target pharmacological approach is often required to further lower LDL-C levels, diminish the atherosclerotic burden, and improve outcomes, especially in high-risk patients [6]. In the past twenty years, dual antiplatelet therapy has shown a net benefit over single antiplatelet therapy in selected high-risk CAD patients (e.g., those with a recent acute coronary syndrome or stent implantation) [15,16]. Similarly, in the past few years, dual lipid-lowering therapy, which combines a statin with a second drug having a different mechanism of action, has been shown to effectively counteract atherosclerosis progression and improve cardiovascular outcomes by the LDL-C pathway blockade [17,18]. In patients with CAD and treated with statins, coronary atherosclerosis regression has been associated with a significant clinical benefit, whereas disease progression is related to a worse outcome [19]. Therefore, examining coronary atherosclerosis development is generally considered useful in the assessment of cardiovascular protection in clinical trials, as a surrogate marker of the outcomes in CAD patients [9,20].

This review summarizes recent evidence on the effects of dual lipid-lowering therapy on coronary atherosclerosis regression.

Section snippets

Dual lipid-lowering therapy: role in atherosclerosis regression

Until a few years ago, despite the extensive evidence showing that statin therapy slowed the progression and induced regression of coronary atherosclerosis [4,5,9,11], it remained unclear whether plaque progression was additionally slowed by a further reduction in LDL-C levels achieved using combination (dual) lipid-lowering therapy (statin plus a non-statin agent). This issue was investigated by two recent clinical trials in CAD patients, evaluating the anti-atherosclerotic effect of ezetimibe

Discussion

The PRECISE-IVUS study and the GLAGOV trial have demonstrated that addition of ezetimibe and evolocumab, respectively, to statin therapy has a favorable effect on coronary atheroma burden [17,18]. In both trials, the percentage of patients demonstrating plaque regression was significantly higher in the active treatment group than in the placebo group. These findings suggest that dual lipid-lowering therapy with these two drugs has incremental benefit on coronary plaque burden in statin-treated

Future directions and open issues

Ongoing development in both atherosclerosis imaging and lipid-lowering therapy present additional questions for future consideration in the context of atheroma regression. A randomized trial called ODYSSEY J-IVUS is currently ongoing to evaluate the efficacy of alirocumab plus statin on coronary atheroma progression in Japanese patients hospitalized for ACS, compared with standard of care (NCT02984982). Results from this study are expected in 2019 and will clarify more the effect of PCSK9

Conclusions

Dual lipid-lowering therapy (DULT) has been shown to be more effective than statin monotherapy in high-risk patients with CAD. Because combination therapy with a statin and either ezetimibe or evolocumab lowers LDL-C levels beyond that achieved with statin monotherapy, DULT has additional protective cardiovascular effects, reducing coronary disease progression and improving cardiovascular outcomes. Considering these data, DULT should be implemented in patients above the recommended LDL-C target

Conflict of interest

The authors declared they do not have anything to disclose regarding conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript.

Financial support

Work supported by a grant from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (FIRB RBFR12W5V5) to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to: (1) conception and design of the article; (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (3) final approval of the version to be published.

References (92)

  • T.E. Strandberg et al.

    Cholesterol and glucose metabolism and recurrent cardiovascular events among the elderly

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2006)
  • K.K. Koh et al.

    Vascular and metabolic effects of ezetimibe combined with simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (2015)
  • Z. Sternberg et al.

    Quantitative and qualitative pleiotropic differences between Simvastatin single and Vytorin combination therapy in hypercholesterolemic subjects

    Atherosclerosis

    (2013)
  • P. Munoz-Pacheco et al.

    Ezetimibe inhibits PMA-induced monocyte/macrophage differentiation by altering microRNA expression: a novel anti-atherosclerotic mechanism

    Pharmacol. Res.

    (2012)
  • L. Qin et al.

    Inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation by ezetimibe via the cyclin D1-MAPK pathway

    J. Pharmacol. Sci.

    (2014)
  • T. Becher et al.

    Ezetimibe inhibits platelet activation and uPAR expression on endothelial cells

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (2017)
  • M. Habara et al.

    Impact on optical coherence tomographic coronary findings of fluvastatin alone versus fluvastatin + ezetimibe

    Am. J. Cardiol.

    (2014)
  • Y. Kataoka et al.

    Cholesterol crystals associate with coronary plaque vulnerability In?Vivo

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2015)
  • D. Gaudet et al.

    Effect of alirocumab, a monoclonal proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 antibody, on lipoprotein(a) concentrations (a pooled analysis of 150 mg every two weeks dosing from phase 2 trials)

    Am. J. Cardiol.

    (2014)
  • F.J. Raal et al.

    PCSK9 inhibition-mediated reduction in Lp(a) with evolocumab: an analysis of 10 clinical trials and the LDL receptor's role

    J. Lipid Res.

    (2016)
  • Z.H. Tang et al.

    New role of PCSK9 in atherosclerotic inflammation promotion involving the TLR4/NF-κB pathway

    Atherosclerosis

    (2017)
  • M.P. Adorni et al.

    Inhibitory effect of PCSK9 on Abca1 protein expression and cholesterol efflux in macrophages

    Atherosclerosis

    (2017)
  • L. Shen et al.

    Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 potentially influences cholesterol uptake in macrophages and reverse cholesterol transport

    FEBS Lett.

    (2013)
  • J.M. Cheng et al.

    PCSK9 in relation to coronary plaque inflammation: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study

    Atherosclerosis

    (2016)
  • R.P. Choudhury et al.

    Arterial effects of canakinumab in patients with atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes or glucose intolerance

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2016)
  • J.T. Chai et al.

    Quantification of lipid-rich core in carotid atherosclerosis using magnetic resonance T 2 mapping

    JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.

    (2017)
  • L. Forte et al.

    C-reactive protein is released in the coronary circulation and causes endothelial dysfunction in patients with acute coronary syndromes

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (2011)
  • D.M. Lloyd-Jones et al.

    2017 focused update of the 2016 ACC Expert consensus decision pathway on the role of non-statin therapies for LDL-cholesterol lowering in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2017)
  • E.G. Nabel et al.

    A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2012)
  • P. Calabrò et al.

    The pleiotropic effects of statins

    Curr. Opin. Cardiol.

    (2005)
  • G.L. Vega et al.

    Influence of lovastatin therapy on metabolism of low density lipoproteins in mixed hyperlipidaemia

    J. Intern. Med.

    (1991)
  • S.E. Nissen et al.

    Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • S.J. Nicholls et al.

    Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2011)
  • B.A. Ference et al.

    Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel

    Eur. Heart J.

    (2017)
  • S. Okazaki

    Early statin treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: demonstration of the beneficial effect on atherosclerotic lesions by serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis during half a year after coronary event: the establish study

    Circulation

    (2004)
  • R. Puri et al.

    Non-HDL cholesterol and TriglyceridesHighlights

    Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.

    (2016)
  • S.E. Nissen et al.

    Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • R. Puri et al.

    Long-term effects of maximally intensive statin therapy on changes in coronary atheroma composition: insights from SATURN

    Eur. Hear. J. - Cardiovasc. Imag.

    (2014)
  • N.J. Stone

    Reducing residual risk in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease

    Circulation

    (2012)
  • M. Valgimigli et al.

    2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS

    Eur. Heart J.

    (2017)
  • P. Calabrò et al.

    Letter by calabrò and gragnano regarding article, “dual antiplatelet therapy continuation beyond 1 Year after drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials”

    Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv

    (2017)
  • S.J. Nicholls et al.

    Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin-treated patients

    JAMA

    (2016)
  • H.M. Garcia-Garcia et al.

    Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis: intravascular ultrasound

    Eur. Heart J.

    (2010)
  • C.M. Ballantyne

    Effect of ezetimibe coadministered with atorvastatin in 628 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial

    Circulation

    (2003)
  • S. Takase et al.

    Ezetimibe in combination with statins ameliorates endothelial dysfunction in coronary arteries after StentingHighlights

    Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.

    (2017)
  • K. Sato et al.

    Dietary cholesterol oxidation products accelerate plaque destabilization and rupture associated with monocyte infiltration/activation via the MCP-1-CCR2 pathway in mouse brachiocephalic arteries: therapeutic effects of ezetimibe

    J. Atherosclerosis Thromb.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text