Elsevier

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Volume 27, Issue 7, August 2012, Pages 1297-1304.e1
The Journal of Arthroplasty

Twenty-Year Survival Analysis in Total Knee Arthroplasty by a Single Surgeon

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.027Get rights and content

Abstract

Between January 1988 and December 2006, a total of 3014 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in 2042 patients were performed, and survivorship analysis was performed. Survivorship analysis showed a 10-year survival of 93.8% and a 20-year survival of 70.9%. There was no significant difference in the survival rate according to sex and diagnosis (P = .142 and .443, respectively). The survival rate was higher in the patients older than 60 years (P < .001). The survival rate of Total Condylar IV (TC-IV) was higher than that of Ortholoc (Dow Corning Wright Medical, Arlington, Tenn) (P < .001). Total knee arthroplasty results in satisfactory long-term survival rates. However, the survival rate decreases over time. The risk of requiring revision TKA was related to age and type of implants. Careful consideration is necessary to decide the time for TKA and select type of implants.

Section snippets

Materials

Between January 1988 and December 2006, a total of 3014 primary TKAs in 2042 patients were performed, and survivorship analysis was performed. Causes for TKA included osteoarthritis in 2640 knees, rheumatoid arthritis in 313 knees, and secondary (postinfectious or posttraumatic) arthritis in 61 knees. Types of implants included Press fit condylar (Johnson & Johnson, Raynham, Mass) in 951 knees, NexGen (Zimmer, Warsaw, Ind) in 799 knees, Ortholoc (Dow Corning Wright Medical, Arlington, Tenn) in

Clinical Results

The HSS score increased from 59.8 ± 13.7 preoperatively to 91.2 ± 5.4 at the final follow-up (P < .001). The HSS scores increased more in rheumatoid arthritis compared with degenerative osteoarthritis (P = .001) (Table 1). The ROM increased from 116.1° ± 25.9° preoperatively to 123.8° ± 17.1° at the final follow-up (P < .001). Although secondary arthritis showed the greatest increase in ROM (P < .001), the actual ROM at the final follow-up was the lowest (P < .001) (Table 1). Flexion

Discussion

The life-table and Kaplan-Meier methods for survival analysis provide a statistically useful tool in assessing long-term survival rate of implants with different follow-up periods. However, these methods require the clarified definition of primary end point and have the limitation of standard error [19]. There have been several studies about survivorship analysis of implants with variable definitions of primary end point. One definition of end point is revision TKA or removal of the original

References (26)

  • J.H. Eickhoff

    The design of clinical graft studies

    Acta Chir Scand

    (1985)
  • P.N. Baker et al.

    A randomised controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2007)
  • G. Petrou et al.

    Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (2004)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Similar 20-year survivorship for single and bilateral total knee arthroplasty

      2022, Knee
      Citation Excerpt :

      A diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis has also been associated with longer implant survival compared to rheumatoid arthritis due to lower rates of PJI in patients with osteoarthritis [8]. There is also literature to suggest that implant design also affects TKA survivorship [7,9–11]. With the variety of TKA implants currently available on the market combined with multiple patient factors and surgical techniques, further research is needed to evaluate the multifactorial impact of patient factors on implant function and long-term survivorship.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supplementary material available at www.arthroplastyjournal.org.

    The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.027.

    View full text