Emergency Medical Service
Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation and outcome after traumatic brain injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.04.008Get rights and content

Study objective

Previous studies disagree about the effect of out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation on traumatic brain injury. This study compares the effects of out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation versus emergency department (ED) endotracheal intubation on mortality and neurologic and functional outcome after severe traumatic brain injury.

Methods

From the 2000 to 2002 Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study (a registry of all patients treated at trauma centers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania), adult patients with head/neck Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or greater and undergoing out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation or ED endotracheal intubation were included. Transferred patients were excluded. The primary outcome was death (on hospital discharge). The secondary outcomes were neurologic (good versus poor, inferred from discharge to home versus long-term care facility) and functional outcome (determined from a Functional Impairment Score). The key exposure was endotracheal intubation (out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation versus ED endotracheal intubation). Using multivariate logistic regression, odds estimates for out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation were adjusted using age, sex, head/neck Abbreviated Injury Scale score, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury (penetrating versus blunt), admission systolic blood pressure, mode of transport (ground only versus helicopter or helicopter + ground), and the use of out-of-hospital neuromuscular blocking agents. A propensity score adjustment accounted for the potential effects of preexisting conditions, inhospital complications, and social factors (drug and alcohol use, race, and insurance coverage).

Results

There were 4,098 patients with head/neck Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or greater who received either out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation (n=1,797, 43.9%) or ED endotracheal intubation (n=2,301, 56.1%). Adjusted odds of death were higher for out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation than ED endotracheal intubation (odds ratio [OR] 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.21 to 4.93). Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation was associated with an increased adjusted odds of poor neurologic outcome (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.15 to 2.26), moderate or severe functional impairment (Functional Impairment Score 6 to 15; OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.40 to 2.64), and severe functional impairment (Functional Impairment Score 11 to 15; OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.52).

Conclusion

Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation was associated with adverse outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. The implications for current clinical care remain undefined.

Introduction

Hypoxia is believed to be deleterious after traumatic brain injury.1., 2., 3. Current guidelines for acute traumatic brain injury therapy call for aggressive measures to prevent hypoxia, including the use of endotracheal intubation.4., 5., 6.

Although endotracheal intubation is readily accomplished in the inhospital setting, multiple factors may complicate the performance of this complex procedure in the out-of-hospital setting, especially in traumatic brain injury patients.7., 8., 9. Recent efforts have introduced controversial advanced airway management techniques to the setting for this patient subset, including the use of neuromuscular blockade–assisted endotracheal intubation.10 However, results from previous studies have generated conflicting data about the potential benefit of out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation in the therapy of traumatic brain injury, with some studies suggesting positive effects and others demonstrating adverse associations.11., 12., 13., 14.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation versus emergency department (ED) endotracheal intubation on mortality and neurologic and functional outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Section snippets

Study design, setting, and data collection and processing

This study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh institutional review board.

We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study, a statewide registry of all patients presenting to accredited trauma centers in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The registry includes patients presenting to a trauma center with a primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) injury code of 800 to 995. All trauma

Characteristics of study subjects

Of 69,226 patients meeting Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study inclusion criteria, we excluded 26,104 pediatric or transferred patients. Of the remaining 43,122 patients, there were 9,720 patients with a head/neck Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or greater. Of these 9,720 patients, 4,098 received endotracheal intubation during the ED phase, including 1,797 (43.9%) out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation and 2,301 (56.1%) ED endotracheal intubation. The ED endotracheal intubation group

Limitations

The most evident limitation of this effort is the use of a preexisting, unvalidated registry. We believe that this approach was justified for several reasons. The use of preexisting data is efficient; we had immediate access to a large-scale body of data with numerous characteristics for outcome identification and risk adjustment. The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study registry collects data on more than 10,000 patients per year using rigorous quality control measures, including detailed audits

Discussion

Although numerous publications exist describing out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation, there are only limited reports linking out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation with inhospital outcomes in either medical or trauma patients.12., 13., 14., 48., 49., 50., 51. Our findings reinforce the importance of this potential connection. Although the patients in the out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation group appear to be more severely injured, our data suggest that an association between

References (53)

  • H.G. Garrison et al.

    Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project III (EMSOP III): the role of risk adjustment in out-of-hospital outcomes research

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2002)
  • R.M. Walls

    Rapid-sequence intubation in head trauma

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1993)
  • J.P. Muizelaar et al.

    Adverse effects of prolonged hyperventilation in patients with severe head injury: a randomized clinical trial

    J Neurosurg

    (1991)
  • F.A. Pigula et al.

    The effect of hypotension and hypoxia on children with severe head injuries

    J Pediatr Surg

    (1993)
  • R.M. Chesnut et al.

    The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury

    J Trauma

    (1993)
  • M.H. Biros et al.

    Prehospital and resuscitative care of the head-injured patient

    Curr Opin Crit Care

    (2001)
  • R. Bullock et al.

    Guidelines for the management of severe head injury: Brain Trauma Foundation

    Eur J Emerg Med

    (1996)
  • Brain Trauma Foundation.Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury. Available at:...
  • H.E. Wang et al.

    Multivariate predictors of failed out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2003)
  • J.V. Doran et al.

    Factors influencing successful intubation in the prehospital setting

    Prehospital Disaster Med

    (1995)
  • T.J. Krisanda et al.

    An analysis of invasive airway management in a suburban emergency medical services system

    Prehospital Disaster Med

    (1992)
  • R.J. Winchell et al.

    Endotracheal intubation in the field improves survival in patients with severe head injury: Trauma Research and Education Foundation of San Diego

    Arch Surg

    (1997)
  • J.A. Murray et al.

    Prehospital intubation in patients with severe head injury

    J Trauma

    (2000)
  • G.V. Bochicchio et al.

    Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury

    J Trauma

    (2003)
  • D.P. Davis et al.

    The effect of paramedic rapid sequence intubation on outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury

    J Trauma

    (2003)
  • R.B. Page et al.

    Head injury and pulmonary embolism: a retrospective report based on the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes study

    Neurosurgery

    (2004)
  • Cited by (233)

    • Prehospital airway management: Intubation, devices, and controversies

      2023, Current Therapy of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care
    • Pre-hospital tracheal intubation in severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, British Journal of Anaesthesia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further indicators of unfavourable outcomes include high age, high ISS, and pupil unresponsiveness – these are indicators of how severe the injury may be, as they are not able to be controlled for.19 The systematic review utilised a comprehensive search strategy of five major databases without restriction, resulting in 19 studies being identified and 15 included in the meta-analysis11-19,30,41-45 and four studies excluded using the Newcastle-Ottowa quality assessment scale.46-49 The review was performed in accordance with pre-specified criteria, and according to PRISMA guidelines.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Author contributions: HEW, ABP, LDC, PDA, and DMY conceived and designed the study. HEW performed the statistical analyses. HEW drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed to its revision. HEW takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

    Presented at the National Association of EMS Physicians annual meeting, Tucson, AZ, January 10, 2004.

    Dr. Wang is supported by Clinical Research Training Award 1 K08 HSO13628 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Reprints not available from the authors.

    View full text