Original article
Intravitreal Injection of Expansile Perfluoropropane (C3F8) for the Treatment of Vitreomacular Traction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.018Get rights and content

Purpose

To study the efficacy of a single intravitreal injection of expansile gas in releasing vitreomacular traction.

Design

Retrospective, interventional case series.

Methods

Fifteen eyes of 14 consecutive patients with symptomatic and persistent vitreomacular traction (>3 months’ duration) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) received a single intravitreal injection of 0.3 mL 100% perfluoropropane (C3F8) as an alternative to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Primary outcome was the number of eyes with complete vitreomacular traction release on OCT 1 month following treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in visual acuity (VA), foveal contour, central foveal thickness, and maximal foveal thickness 1 month following treatment, and final VA.

Results

Mean age (± SD) was 72.1 ± 12.6 years. Mean follow-up was 398.7 ± 174.4 days. Vitreomacular traction was idiopathic in 7 eyes and associated with diabetes in 6. One month following treatment, vitreomacular traction was released in 6 eyes (40%). Three further eyes (20%) had resolution of vitreomacular traction within 6 months, 4 (27%) underwent PPV, and 2 (13%) subsequently declined surgery. Foveal contour was restored in 7 eyes (47%). VA and central foveal thickness were similar 1 month following treatment, but maximal foveal thickness decreased by 65.8 μm (P = .041). Mean final VA decreased 0.03 logMAR units from baseline (P = .536). Eyes with vitreomacular traction release within 1 month had less extensive vitreomacular traction (P = .037), low vitreous face reflectivity, and maximal foveal thickness <500 μm (P = .004) pretreatment. There were no associated adverse events.

Conclusions

Intravitreal C3F8 injection could offer a minimally invasive alternative to PPV in patients with symptomatic and persistent vitreomacular traction. It appears particularly effective in eyes with less extensive vitreomacular traction and low vitreous face reflectivity on SD OCT. Further studies are warranted.

Section snippets

Methods

This study reports a retrospective consecutive series of patients who elected to undergo an intravitreal gas injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction, between September 2009 and May 2011, in a tertiary retinal unit in a large London teaching hospital. All patients underwent assessment of Snellen VA, tonometry, anterior and posterior segment biomicroscopy, and SD OCT (Spectralis HRA+OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany; or Cirrus, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California,

Patient Demographics

Fifteen eyes of 14 patients with persistent and symptomatic vitreomacular traction were treated. Eight patients were male. Nine were white, 3 were Afro-Caribbean, and 2 were Asian. Mean age (± SD) at presentation was 72.1 ± 12.6 years (range: 36-89). Vitreomacular traction was documented on SD OCT for a mean of 328.1 ± 250.9 days prior to treatment (range: 70-860). Mean follow-up after treatment was 353.75 ± 159.62 days (range: 91-658). In 7 eyes vitreomacular traction was labeled as idiopathic

Discussion

This study describes the use of single intravitreal injection of expansile gas to relieve vitreomacular traction as an alternative to PPV, in a range of conditions, observed using SD OCT. We found it to be successful in 40% of patients within 1 month of the intervention, and in 60% within 6 months. Although there was no significant change in VA, there was restoration of normal foveal contour in 77% of eyes following successful vitreomacular traction release. Only 33% of these cases, all of

Ian Rodrigues is a Specialty Registrar in the London Ophthalmology post-graduate training program. He undertook his undergraduate medical training at Guy’s, King’s & St Thomas’ Medical School, University of London and completed an intercalated BSc in diabetes and endocrinology. He continues to have a wide area of interest in clinical ophthalmology.

References (37)

  • C.K. Chan et al.

    Pneumatic retinopexy for the repair of retinal detachments: a comprehensive review (1986-2007)

    Surv Ophthalmol

    (2008)
  • J. Sebag

    Anatomy and pathology of the vitreo-retinal interface

    Eye (Lond)

    (1992)
  • F. Best

    Der Glaskorper bei Augenbewegungen

    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd

    (1904)
  • J. Sebag

    Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-retinal disease

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

    (2004)
  • V.J. Srinivasan et al.

    High-definition and 3-dimensional imaging of macular pathologies with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography

    Ophthalmology

    (2006)
  • M.W. Johnson

    Posterior vitreous detachment. Evolution and complications of its early stages

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2010)
  • M.W. Johnson

    Tractional cystoid macular edema: a subtle variant of the vitreomacular traction syndrome

    Am J Ophthalmol

    (2005)
  • N.S. Melberg et al.

    Vitrectomy for vitreomacular traction syndrome with macular detachment

    Retina

    (1995)
  • Cited by (60)

    • Time dependent degradation of vitreous gel under enzymatic reaction: Polymeric network role in fluid properties

      2020, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently an enzymatic intravitreal injection, Jetrea (Ocriplasmin, Thrombogenics, Inc), has been found to induce pharmacologic vitreolysis by means of proteolysis of the vitreoretinal connections (Haller et al., 2015). In addition, studies introduced intravitreal injection of certain gases to exert mechanical forces and remove the adhesion of the vitreous gel to the retina (McDonald et al., 1994; Rodrigues et al., 2013). Further investigations are essential to fully characterize and improve the effects of the mentioned treatments on the vitreous gel.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Ian Rodrigues is a Specialty Registrar in the London Ophthalmology post-graduate training program. He undertook his undergraduate medical training at Guy’s, King’s & St Thomas’ Medical School, University of London and completed an intercalated BSc in diabetes and endocrinology. He continues to have a wide area of interest in clinical ophthalmology.

    Tim Jackson is a senior clinical lecturer at King’s College London, and Honorary Consultant Vitreoretinal Surgeon at King’s College Hospital. He undertook his medical training in New Zealand, and his Ophthalmology Residency and Vitreoretinal Fellowships at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London. He completed a PhD within the University of London and maintains an active clinical and laboratory-based research portfolio.

    See Accompanying Editorial on page 203.

    View full text