Original article
Reproducibility of Retinal Thickness Measurements on Normal and Pathologic Eyes by Different Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.025Get rights and content

Purpose

To compare retinal thickness measurements produced by different time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT and SD-OCT) devices when imaging normal and pathologic eyes.

Design

Prospective, observational study in an academic institutional setting.

Methods

A total of 110 eyes were imaged by 6 different OCT devices: Stratus and Cirrus (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc), Spectralis HRA+OCT (Heidelberg Engineering), RTVue-100 (Optovue Inc), SDOCT Copernicus HR (Optopol Technology S.A.), and 3D OCT-1000 (Topcon Corporation). Eyes were normal or affected by different pathologies of the retina, including exudative and nonexudative age-related macular degeneration, epiretinal membrane, cystoid macular edema, and macular hole. For each instrument we used standard analysis protocols for macular thickness evaluation. Mean retinal thickness values between the instruments in the ETDRS central circular 1000-μm-diameter areas and in the ETDRS midperipheral circular 3000-μm-diameter areas were compared.

Results

The 6 different devices produced measurements that differ in variance (Bartlett test, P = .006), and mean values (Friedman test, P < .001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the limits of agreement for all the comparisons were not acceptable. Regression was calculated and it was elaborated into a conversion table, despite a high standard error for both intercepts and slope conversion values.

Conclusions

This study suggests that retinal thickness measurements obtained with various OCT devices are different beyond clinical practice tolerance, according to Bland-Altman analysis. Furthermore, regression analysis reveals high standard error values. These differences appear to be primarily attributable to the analysis algorithms used to set retinal inner and outer boundaries.

Section snippets

Methods

This prospective study was performed on consecutive patients with pathologic retinal diseases and also normal retinas at the Eye Clinic, Department of Clinical Science, Luigi Sacco Hospital, University of Milan after obtaining informed written consent. All patients underwent OCT examination on the same clinic visit using 6 different OCT instruments: Stratus (Version 4.0.2; Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc), Cirrus (Version 2.0.0.54; Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc), Spectralis HRA+OCT (Version 3.1.4; Heidelberg

Results

Image analysis was performed on a total of 110 eyes (63 patients; 23 male, 40 female). The mean patient age was 65.7 (range: 20–90); the mean corrected visual acuity was 20/32 (range: 20/320–20/20). Thirty-one of the eyes (28.2%) were normal, 25 (22.7%) were affected by exudative age-related macular degeneration, 17 (15.5%) by epiretinal membrane without foveal contour alterations, 13 (11.8%) by cystoid macular edema from diabetic retinopathy, and 12 (10.9%) by nonexudative age-related macular

Discussion

In this study retinal thickness was evaluated and compared with 6 different OCT instruments on the same patients. This was done in order to attempt to simulate a standard clinical situation, not simply focusing on normal subjects or executing repetitive measurements to validate the reproducibility of that measurement.

The results suggest that the comparison between the instruments is nearly impossible, a conclusion shared by several authors looking at both normal and pathologic eyes.31, 32, 33,

Andrea Giani, MD, received his medical degree in 2003 from University of Milan, Italy, and completed his residency in 2007 at Eye Clinic, Luigi Sacco Hospital in Milan, Italy. He collaborated with IRCCS Bietti Foundation in Rome and Eye Clinic, Luigi Sacco Hospital in Milan as clinical investigator.

He joined the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School in 2009, where he started a research fellowship. His specialty interests include age-related macular degeneration and retinal

References (39)

  • D. Huang et al.

    Optical coherence tomography

    Science

    (1991)
  • E.A. Swanson et al.

    In-vivo retinal imaging by optical coherence tomography

    Opt Lett

    (1993)
  • M.R. Hee et al.

    Optical coherence tomography of the human retina

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1995)
  • S. Muscat et al.

    Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical serous detachment of the macula secondary to a choroidal nevus

    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers

    (2001)
  • D. Thomas et al.

    Optical coherence tomography—a review of the principles and contemporary uses in retinal investigation

    Eye

    (2004)
  • P. Massin et al.

    Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2001)
  • D. Koozekanani et al.

    Intersession repeatability of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey 2000 OCT

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2000)
  • S. Muscat et al.

    Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

    (2002)
  • M. Shahidi et al.

    Retinal thickness analysis for quantitative assessment of diabetic macular edema

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1991)
  • Cited by (149)

    • Functional and anatomic changes between early postoperative recovery and long-term follow-up after combined epiretinal and internal limiting membrane peeling

      2023, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the same time, the progressive thinning of the retinal layers may represent the long, slow process of the retina returning back to its more normal configuration. However, different OCT devices were used in different studies, and a high variability has been described in normal and pathologic eyes among several OCT instruments.24 Hence, we cannot rule out that different surgical approaches can influence remodeling of the retinal layers differently.

    • Outer Retinal Layer Thickening Predicts the Onset of Exudative Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

      2021, American Journal of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Eyes were excluded from the analysis if Geographic Atrophy (GA), subretinal fibrosis, or retinal pigment epithelial detachment (defined as RPE–BM detachment of >100 µm) were present at baseline.8 These features could deeply affect the automatic segmentation performed by the inbuilt OCT software (Eye Explorer, v 1.9.10.0; Heidelberg Engineering) used for the analysis.8 Patients who developed polypoidal neovascularization were excluded.

    • Deep learning in optical coherence tomography: Where are the gaps?

      2023, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Andrea Giani, MD, received his medical degree in 2003 from University of Milan, Italy, and completed his residency in 2007 at Eye Clinic, Luigi Sacco Hospital in Milan, Italy. He collaborated with IRCCS Bietti Foundation in Rome and Eye Clinic, Luigi Sacco Hospital in Milan as clinical investigator.

    He joined the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School in 2009, where he started a research fellowship. His specialty interests include age-related macular degeneration and retinal degenerations. His clinical research interests are focused on the study of optical coherence tomography clinical applications and the evaluation of other imaging techniques, such as fundus autofluorescence. His basic research interests include the evaluation of age-related macular degeneration animal models and the assessment of new drugs efficacy in retinal degenerations.

    He has published several peer-reviewed papers, he is author of numerous communication in international meetings, and he is co-author of a text on optical coherence tomography. He is a member of the Italian Association of Ophthalmology, and the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

    View full text