Short communicationBody image, body satisfaction, and eating patterns in normal-weight and overweight/obese women current smokers and never-smokers
Introduction
Nicotine suppresses body weight, an effect that has been shown to encourage initiation and maintenance of smoking in women (e.g., French et al., 1994, Klesges et al., 1988, Levine et al., 2001, Pomerleau et al., 2001, Pomerleau et al., 2001). Women with strong concerns about weight have been shown to be overrepresented among smokers compared with women who have never smoked (Clark et al., 2006, Wee et al., 2001).
Conflicting findings have been reported on whether this excess preoccupation with weight among smokers translates into poorer body image and body dissatisfaction. King, Matacin, Marcus, Bock, and Tripolone (2000), for example, found that adult smokers tend to feel relatively unattractive compared with a normative sample. Croghan et al. (2006), on the other hand, recently reported no differences between college women smokers and never-smokers in body satisfaction; they observed, however, that among smokers, body dissatisfaction positively predicted amount of smoking.
The present study was designed to determine whether smokers differed from never-smokers with respect to body image. Data were collected from women current smokers and never-smokers recruited from the local community on variables related to body image and body satisfaction, as well as on patterns of disordered or maladaptive eating (e.g., high scores on cognitive restraint—that is, excess dieting; and disinhibited eating—that is, uncontrolled and labile eating behavior). We hypothesized that women smokers would exhibit poorer or less realistic body image than their never-smoking counterparts, and that these differences would be particularly salient among overweight and obese women.
Section snippets
Participants
Participants were 587 women (420 current daily smokers, 167 never-smokers), 18–55 years old, recruited from the local community between 1994 and 2002 (mostly in 1994–1995) to participate in biobehavioral laboratory investigations of smoking and nicotine dependence and in clinical trials of smoking cessation medications. Although qualifications varied by study, most smokers were required to smoke at least 10 cigarettes/day for at least 3 years. Never-smokers were required to have smoked < 100
Sample characteristics
Baseline and demographic characteristics of normal-weight and overweight/obese never-smokers and current daily smokers are shown in Table 1. Forty-four percent of both smokers and never-smokers fell into the overweight or obese category (BMI ≥ 25).
Current smokers vs. never-smokers
Differences based on smoking and weight status in measures of body image, body satisfaction, and restrained and disinhibited eating are shown in Table 2.
Normal-weight vs. overweight/obese smokers
Overweight/obese smokers were significantly more concerned than normal-weight smokers about
Discussion
Forty-four percent of our sample was either overweight or obese. This is somewhat less than the national prevalence of overweight or obesity during the time when most of the data were collected (56% in 1988–1994; National Center for Health Statistics, 1994)—possibly because the participants were drawn from a relatively affluent university community (Zhang & Wang, 2004).
As expected, overweight/obese individuals accurately perceived themselves as larger than normal-weight individuals. Smokers did
Acknowledgments
Preparation of this manuscript was supported by Grant HL52981 to the first author from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. A preliminary version of this report was presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Orlando, FL.
References (17)
- et al.
Body image treatment for weight concerned smokers: A pilot study
Addictive Behaviors
(2005) - et al.
The prevalence of weight concerns in a smoking abstinence clinical trial
Addictive Behaviors
(2006) - et al.
Body image evaluations in women smokers
Addictive Behaviors
(2000) - et al.
A prospective examination of body image and smoking cessation in women
Body Image
(2005) - et al.
The severity of dieting and bingeing behaviors in college women: Interview validation of survey data
Journal of Psychiatric Research
(1995) - et al.
The characteristics of women smokers concerned about postcessation weight gain
Addictive Behaviors
(2001) - et al.
Race differences in weight concerns among women smokers: Results from two independent samples
Addictive Behaviors
(2001) - et al.
The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(1985)
Cited by (45)
The impact of different responses to negative body talk on body satisfaction, shame, and future fat talk likelihood: A UK sample
2021, Body ImageCitation Excerpt :was used in the current study to capture participants’ pre-manipulation body satisfaction level on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Completely dissatisfied) to 5 (Completely satisfied) (Mills et al., 2019). Numerous previous studies have used a single item measure for body satisfaction (e.g., Drutschinin, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, De Paoli, Lewis, & Krug, 2017; Durkin, Paxton, & Sorbello, 2007; Fitzsimmons-Craft et al., 2016; Mills & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, 2018; Pomerleau & Saules, 2007; Rogers, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Lewis, Krug, & Richardson, 2017), based on evidence that a single item measure shows construct validity and is also capable of distinguishing between different levels of body satisfaction over time (Fitzsimmons-Craft et al., 2016; Rogers et al., 2017). The single item measure of shame that was designed specifically for the original study based off the structure of the body satisfaction single item was reused in the current study (“To what extent do you feel ashamed right now?”
Appearance comparison and other appearance-related influences on body dissatisfaction in everyday life
2019, Body ImageCitation Excerpt :Scores were reverse-coded so that higher scores indicated greater dissatisfaction. This single item approach is consistent with several prior investigations of body satisfaction (e.g., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Dias et al., 2018; Pomerleau & Saules, 2007; Rogers, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Lewis, Krug, & Richardson, 2017; Sonneville et al., 2012). Participants were asked ‘Since the last time you were signalled, to what extent did you think about how you looked?’
An ecological momentary assessment of the effect of fasting during Ramadan on disordered eating behaviors
2018, AppetiteCitation Excerpt :on an 11-point Likert scale from 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 10 (extremely satisfied). This single item approach is consistent with several prior investigations of body satisfaction (e.g., Pomerleau & Saules, 2007; Rogers, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Lewis, Krug, & Richardson, 2017; Sonneville et al., 2012) and has established criterion validity in these studies. Several study-specific items were used to probe restriction efforts and other DE constructs.