Research in context
Evidence before this study
National guidelines maintain information about diabetes classification, but this classification has not been much updated during the past 20 years, and very few attempts have been made to explore heterogeneity of type 2 diabetes. We searched PubMed up to Jan 1, 2017, using the Medical Subject Heading terms “diabetes mellitus”, “type 2”, and “classification”. We identified several calls from expert groups for a revised classification, but few efforts to subgroup type 2 diabetes, none of which have been implemented in the clinic.
Added value of this study
In this study, a data-driven cluster analysis of six simple variables measured at diagnosis in adult patients with newly diagnosed diabetes (n=14 755) identified five replicable clusters of patients with significantly different characteristics and risk of diabetic complications. These included a cluster of very insulin-resistant individuals with significantly higher risk of diabetic kidney disease than the other clusters, a cluster of relatively young insulin-deficient individuals with poor metabolic control (high HbA1c), and a large group of elderly patients with the most benign disease course.
Implications of all the available evidence
This new substratification could change the way we think about type 2 diabetes and help to tailor and target early treatment to patients who would benefit most, thereby representing a first step towards precision medicine in diabetes.