Review
Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70435-2Get rights and content

Summary

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is an often fatal viral infection described in about 30 countries, and it has the most extensive geographic distribution of the medically important tickborne viral diseases, closely approximating the known global distribution of Hyalomma spp ticks. Human beings become infected through tick bites, by crushing infected ticks, after contact with a patient with CCHF during the acute phase of infection, or by contact with blood or tissues from viraemic livestock. Clinical features commonly show a dramatic progression characterised by haemorrhage, myalgia, and fever. The levels of liver enzymes, creatinine phosphokinase, and lactate dehydrogenase are raised, and bleeding markers are prolonged. Infection of the endothelium has a major pathogenic role. Besides direct infection of the endothelium, indirect damage by viral factors or virus-mediated host-derived soluble factors that cause endothelial activations and dysfunction are thought to occur. In diagnosis, enzyme-linked immunoassay and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR are used. Early diagnosis is critical for patient therapy and prevention of potential nosocomial infections. Supportive therapy is the most essential part of case management. Recent studies suggest that ribavirin is effective against CCHF, although definitive studies are not available. Health-care workers have a serious risk of infection, particularly during care of patients with haemorrhages from the nose, mouth, gums, vagina, and injection sites. Simple barrier precautions have been reported to be effective.

Introduction

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a fatal viral infection described in parts of Africa, Asia, eastern Europe, and the middle east.1, 2 The virus belongs to the genus Nairovirus in the Bunyaviridae family and causes severe diseases in human beings, with a reported mortality rate of 3–30%.2, 3 The geographic range of CCHF virus is the most extensive one among the medically important tickborne viruses (figure 1). Human beings become infected through tick bites, by contact with a patient with CCHF during the acute phase of infection, or by contact with blood or tissues from viraemic livestock.4 The clinical features show common dramatic progression characterised by haemorrhage, myalgia, and fever, with some differences among different regions suggested but not well studied. Treatment with ribavirin has not yet been approved in many countries. However, there are reports that indicate the drug may be beneficial. The widespread geographic distribution of CCHF virus, its ability to produce severe human disease with high mortality rates, and fears about its intentional use as a bioterrorism agent5 make the virus an important human pathogen. Moreover, ecological complexity of vectorborne diseases, therapeutic controversy, and human-to-human transmission of a zoonotic infection make CCHF an interesting topic for research.

There has been a substantial increase in reports on CCHF virus over the past 5 years. Here I review published work on CCHF, with an emphasis on the recent outbreak in Turkey. CCHF virus-infected cases were first reported in Turkey in 2002,3, 6, 7, 8 although epidemics have been reported from neighbouring countries since the 1970s. Between 2002 and 2005, 500 cases were reported to Turkish Ministry of Health, and 26 (5·2%) of these cases died.9

Section snippets

Historical background

In the 12th century, a haemorrhagic syndrome was described in present day Tajikistan. The signs were presence of blood in the urine, rectum, gums, vomitus, sputum, and abdominal cavity.1 The arthropod that caused the disease was said to be tough, small, related to a louse or tick, and normally parasitising a black bird. In the modern era, Crimean haemorrhagic fever was first described as a clinical entity in 1944–45, when about 200 Soviet military personnel were infected while assisting

Epidemiology

The geographic range of CCHF virus is the most extensive among the tickborne viruses that affect human health, and the second most widespread of all medically important arboviruses, after dengue viruses (figure 1).2

The history of reported outbreaks is summarised in table 1. Before 1970, most cases were reported from the former Soviet Union (Crimea, Astrakhan, Rostov, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan)1, 2 and Bulgaria,1, 2 as well as virus circulation in parts of Africa such as the Democratic

The microbiology and the life cycle of the virus

CCHF is a member of the Nairovirus genus of the family Bunyaviridae. Other genera within the family include Orthobunyavirus, Hantavirus, Phlebovirus, and Tospovirus. The Nairovirus genus includes 34 described viruses and is divided into seven different serogroups.56 The most important groups are the CCHF group, which includes CCHF virus and Hazara virus, and the Nairobi sheep disease group, which includes the Nairobi sheep disease and Dugbe viruses.4 CCHF virus, Dugbe virus, and Nairobi sheep

Phylogenetic studies and worldwide diversity

In 1970, when the virus was first named as CCHF virus,15 the antigenic structures of the viruses from various geographic regions were thought to be indistinguishable. However, the development of nucleic acid sequence analysis techniques revealed extensive genetic diversity. Most nucleic acid sequence analyses are based on the S segment of the genome, although some recent studies were done on the M RNA segment. According to these studies, there are eight genetically distinct clades.15

Because of

Vertebrate reservoir hosts

CCHF virus circulates in an enzootic tick–vertebrate–tick cycle, and there is no evidence that the virus causes disease in animals. CCHF viral infection has been commonly demonstrated among smaller wildlife species—eg, hares and hedgehogs—that act as hosts for the immature stages of the tick vectors.1, 2 Antibodies against CCHF virus have been detected in the sera of horses, donkeys, goats, cattle, sheep, and pigs in various regions of Europe, Asia, and Africa.2 It must be borne in mind that

Risk factors for infection among human beings

Epidemiologically, CCHF cases are distributed mainly among actively working age groups exposed to tick populations. The major at-risk group are farmers living in endemic areas; most of the affected cases deal with agriculture and/or animal husbandry. Almost 90% of the cases in the recent outbreak in Turkey were farmers.3, 6, 7 Although there is no evidence that the virus causes disease in animals, CCHF virus-infected individuals were reported after skin contact with livestock and other animals.1

Course of infection and clinical features

Human beings are the only known host of CCHF virus in which disease is manifested.2, 4 In one Russian study84 the probability of developing CCHF for people who had been infected was found to be 0·215—ie, one of every five infected people develops CCHF.

The typical course of CCHF infection has four distinct phases: incubation, prehaemorrhagic, haemorrhagic, and convalescence periods (figure 3).1 The incubation period that follows a tick bite is usually short—3–7 days—but it is difficult to obtain

Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis of CCHF is not well described. A common pathogenic feature of haemorrhagic fever viruses is their ability to disable the host immune response by attacking and manipulating the cells that initiate the antiviral response.88 This damage is characterised by marked replication of the virus together with dysregulation of the vascular system and lymphoid organs.89

Infection of the endothelium has an important role in CCHF pathogenesis.90, 91 The endothelium can be targeted in two

Diagnosis

Early diagnosis is critical both for patient survival and for the prevention of potential nosocomial infections and transmission in the community. Suspected cases should be evaluated and their management carefully planned, including supportive care, particularly haematological support (panel). The differential diagnosis list differs according to geographic location, and includes bacterial, viral, and non-infectious causes (table 3).

Treatment

Supportive therapy is the most essential part of case management, and includes the administration of thrombocytes, fresh frozen plasma, and erythrocyte preparations. Replacement therapy with these blood products should be done after checking the patient's complete blood count, which should be done once or twice a day. Potential bleeding foci should be considered and conservative measures taken—eg, the use of histamine receptor blockers for peptic ulcer patients, avoidance of intramuscular

Prevention

People living in endemic areas should use personal protective measures that include the avoidance of areas where tick vectors are abundant, particularly when they are active; regular examination of clothing and skin for ticks, and their removal; and the use of repellents.105 People who are exposed to potentially viraemic animal blood should take practical measures to protect themselves, including the use of repellents on the skin and clothing and wearing gloves or other protective clothing to

Future research areas

The dynamics of the enzootic environment and transmission cycle of the CCHF virus need to be further detailed. The role of climatic factors, reservoir hosts, and vectors should be described. These studies need multidisciplinary team work, including entomologists, microbiologists, epidemiologists, veterinarians, and clinicians. New data on viral replication offers substantial potential for the development of new drugs. Further studies on the pathogenesis of viral haemorrhagic fevers will shed

Search strategy and selection criteria

Data for this review were identified by searches of PubMed, Google, and references from relevant articles, using the search terms “Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever”, “viral haemorrhagic fever”, and “ribavirin”. No date limits were set; only the abstracts of non-English language papers were included.

References (112)

  • RandolphSE

    Evidence that climate change has caused ‘emergence’ of tick-borne diseases in Europe?

    Int J Med Microbiol

    (2004)
  • ShepherdAJ et al.

    Field and laboratory investigation of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (Nairovirus, family Bunyaviridae) infection in birds

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (1987)
  • CelikbasA et al.

    Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever infection simulating acute appendicitis

    J Infect

    (2005)
  • DrostenC et al.

    Molecular diagnostics of viral hemorrhagic fevers

    Antiviral Res

    (2003)
  • CharrelRN et al.

    Tick-borne virus diseases of human interest in Europe

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (2004)
  • HoogstraalH

    The epidemiology of tick borne Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Asia, Europe, and Africa

    J Med Entomol

    (1979)
  • WattsDM et al.

    Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever

  • ErgonulO et al.

    The characteristics of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in a recent outbreak in Turkey and the impact of oral ribavirin therapy

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • Bioterrorism agents/diseases

  • KartiSS et al.

    Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Turkey

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • BakirM et al.

    Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever outbreak in Middle Anatolia: a multicentre study of clinical features and outcome measures

    J Med Microbiol

    (2005)
  • Ministry of Health Turkey. Reports of the Communicable Diseases Department, Ankara, 2005 (in...
  • SimpsonDIH et al.

    Congo virus: a hitherto undescribed virus occuring in Africa. Human isolations-clinical notes

    East Afr Med J

    (1967)
  • CasalsJ

    Antigenic similarity between the virus causing Crimean hemorrhagic fever and Congo virus

    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med

    (1969)
  • BegumF et al.

    Tick-borne viruses of west Pakistan. IV. Viruses similar to or identical with, Crimean hemorrhagic fever (Congo-Semunya), Wad Medani and Pak Argas 461 isolated from ticks of the Changa Manga Forest, Lahore District, and of Hunza, Gilgit Agency, W. Pakistan

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1970)
  • WoodallJP et al.

    Congo virus: a hitherto undescribed virus occurring in Africa. II. Identification studies

    East Afr Med J

    (1967)
  • CauseyOR et al.

    Congo virus from domestic livestock, African hedgehog, and arthropods in Nigeria

    Am J Trop Med Hyg

    (1970)
  • CasalsJ et al.

    A review of Soviet viral hemorrhagic fevers, 1969

    J Infect Dis

    (1970)
  • PapaA et al.

    Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Bulgaria

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • PapaA et al.

    Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Albania, 2001

    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • PapaA et al.

    Genetic detection and isolation of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Kosovo, Yugoslavia

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • PapaA et al.

    Genetic characterization of the M RNA segment of Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever virus strains, China

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • BurneyMI et al.

    Nosocomial outbreak of viral hemorrhagic fever caused by Crimean hemorrhagic fever-Congo virus in Pakistan, January 1976

    Am J Trop Med Hyg

    (1980)
  • SmegoRA et al.

    Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: Prevention and control limitations in a resource poor country

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • SuleimanMN et al.

    Congo/Crimean haemorrhagic fever in Dubai. An outbreak at the Rashid hospital

    Lancet

    (1980)
  • SchwarzTF et al.

    Clinical features of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in the United Arab Emirates

    Infection

    (1997)
  • Al-TikritiSK et al.

    Congo/Crimean haemorrhagic fever in Iraq

    Bull World Health Organ

    (1981)
  • TantawiHH et al.

    Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in Iraq: isolation, identification and electron microscopy

    Acta Virol

    (1980)
  • WilliamsRJ et al.

    Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever: a seroepidemiological and tick survey in the Sultanate of Oman

    Trop Med Int Health

    (2000)
  • MardaniM et al.

    The efficacy of oral ribavirin in the treatment of crimean-congo hemorrhagic fever in Iran

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2003)
  • AntoniadisA et al.

    Serological evidence of human infection with Congo-Crimean hemorrhagic fever virus in Greece

    Am J Trop Med Hyg

    (1982)
  • DunsterL et al.

    First documentation of human Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Kenya

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • YenYC et al.

    Characteristics of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (Xinjiang strain) in China

    Am J Trop Med Hyg

    (1985)
  • GearJH et al.

    Congo-Crimean haemorrhagic fever in South Africa. Report of a fatal case in the Transvaal

    S Afr Med J

    (1982)
  • SwanepoelR et al.

    Crimean-congo hemorrhagic fever in South Africa

    Am J Trop Med Hyg

    (1983)
  • SwanepoelR et al.

    Investigations following initial recognition of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in South Africa and the diagnosis of 2 further cases

    S Afr Med J

    (1985)
  • SwanepoelR et al.

    A common-source outbreak of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever on a dairy farm

    S Afr Med J

    (1985)
  • van EedenPJ et al.

    A nosocomial outbreak of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever at Tygerberg Hospital. Part I. Clinical features

    S Afr Med J

    (1985)
  • van EedenPJ et al.

    A nosocomial outbreak of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever at Tygerberg Hospital. Part II. Management of patients

    S Afr Med J

    (1985)
  • JoubertJR et al.

    A nosocomial outbreak of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever at Tygerberg Hospital. Part III. Clinical pathology and pathogenesis

    S Afr Med J

    (1985)
  • Cited by (884)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text