Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 18, Issue 1, January 2017, Pages 31-41
The Lancet Oncology

Articles
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30624-6Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Nivolumab has shown improved survival in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. We assessed the safety and activity of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy for NSCLC.

Methods

The open-label, phase 1, multicohort study (CheckMate 012) cohorts reported here were enrolled at eight US academic centres. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent stage IIIb or stage IV, chemotherapy-naive NSCLC. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by an interactive voice response system to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 12 weeks, or nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal of consent. Data from the latter two cohorts, which were considered potentially suitable for further clinical development, are presented in this report; data from the other cohort (as well as several earlier cohorts) are described in the appendix. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability, assessed in all treated patients. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01454102.

Findings

Between May 15, 2014, and March 25, 2015, 78 patients were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab every 12 weeks (n=38) or nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab every 6 weeks (n=40). One patient in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort was excluded before treatment; therefore 77 patients actually received treatment (38 in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort; 39 in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort). At data cut-off on Jan 7, 2016, 29 (76%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 32 (82%) in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort had discontinued treatment. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 (37%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 13 (33%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort; the most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased lipase (three [8%] and no patients), pneumonitis (two [5%] and one [3%] patients), adrenal insufficiency (one [3%] and two [5%] patients), and colitis (one [3%] and two [5%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 12 (32%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 11 (28%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (any grade) prompted treatment discontinuation in four (11%) patients in the every-12-weeks cohort and five (13%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Confirmed objective responses were achieved in 18 (47% [95% CI 31–64]) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 15 (38% [95% CI 23–55]) patients in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort; median duration of response was not reached in either cohort, with median follow-up times of 12·8 months (IQR 9·3–15·5) in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 11·8 months (6·7–15·9) in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort. In patients with PD-L1 of 1% or greater, confirmed objective responses were achieved in 12 (57%) of 21 patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 13 (57%) of 23 patients in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort.

Interpretation

In NSCLC, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab had a tolerable safety profile and showed encouraging clinical activity characterised by a high response rate and durable response. To our knowledge, the results of this study are the first suggestion of improved benefit compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy in patients with NSCLC, supporting further assessment of this combination in a phase 3 study.

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Introduction

In patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable mutations, first-line treatment is platinum-based combination chemotherapy. This approach has been the standard of care for the past three decades with few improvements in outcomes,1, 2 and is characterised by moderate-to-severe toxicities, including haematological adverse events and non-haematological toxicities, such as fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and alopecia. The proportion of patients who achieved a response to chemotherapy remains in the 30% range;1, 3, 4 responses are rarely durable, and nearly half of patients die within 1 year.3, 4, 5 A profound need exists for treatment strategies to improve long-term survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC.

Research in context

Evidence before this study

We searched PubMed for reports published between Jan 1, 2010, and Aug 24, 2016, without language restrictions, using the search terms “immunotherapy”, “nivolumab”, “pembrolizumab”, “durvalumab”, “atezolizumab”, “ipilimumab”, “tremelimumab”, “anti-PD-1”, “anti-PD-L1”, or “anti-CTLA-4” with “combination” and “lung”. Anti-PD-1 monotherapies have shown improved survival compared with docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Recently, a response rate of 23% was reported with the combination of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in patients with advanced NSCLC, most of whom had been previously treated with chemotherapy. In patients with melanoma, the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed improved response and survival compared with either agent alone. The present study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive, advanced NSCLC.

Added value of this study

The results of this trial show that the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab is well tolerated and is associated with promising, durable, clinical activity. Response rates were at least comparable with those achieved with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and seemed to exceed the activity expected with nivolumab monotherapy based on previously reported phase 1 data, especially in patients with PD-L1-positive NSCLC.

Implications of all the available evidence

To our knowledge, the results of this study represent the first suggestion of improved benefit relative to anti-PD-1 monotherapy in patients with NSCLC and highlight the potential role for immunotherapy combinations as first-line treatment for NSCLC. Based on these findings, first-line combination treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab is being prospectively assessed in patients with advanced NSCLC in an ongoing phase 3 study.

Antibodies that inhibit immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 have improved outcomes for patients with several different types of cancers.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 In NSCLC, nivolumab (a fully human IgG4 antibody against PD-1) improves overall survival compared with docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC.10, 11 The proportion of patients responding to nivolumab ranges from 15% to 20% in unselected patients,10, 11, 13 and responses have tended to be durable, persisting for months or years even after discontinuation of therapy.13

Since PD-1 and CTLA-4 modulate effector T-cell activation, proliferation, and function through distinct, complementary mechanisms,14 the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (a fully human IgG1 antibody against CTLA-4) represents a rational approach to improve antitumour immunity. In patients with metastatic melanoma, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab has enhanced activity relative to either monotherapy,15, 16 and median overall survival was not reached after a minimum of 2 years follow-up.17 The combination is approved in the USA and Europe for patients with melanoma.

Given the established safety and activity of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated advanced NSCLC and the long-term survival reported with combination immunotherapy in melanoma, this portion of the phase 1 multicohort CheckMate 012 study was designed to assess nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. Separate cohorts of this study in which nivolumab was given as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies have been reported previously.18, 19

Section snippets

Study design and participants

This was an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study done at nine academic centres in the USA and three in Canada. Patients in the cohorts reported here were enrolled at eight of the US centres (appendix p 2). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent stage IIIb or stage IV NSCLC with radiographic evidence of measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1.20 Patients were required to be

Results

Initial cohorts specified in an early amendment to the CheckMate 012 protocol assessed the safety and efficacy of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab given in the following schedules: nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg or nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent (appendix pp 12–16).22 These schedules were characterised by poor

Discussion

Results from this phase 1 trial show that first-line nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 12 weeks or every 6 weeks is tolerable, with a notable improvement in safety compared with previous schedules.22 This treatment schedule also showed encouraging clinical activity, which was particularly enhanced in patients with tumour PD-L1 expression of 1% or higher.

With median follow-up of 12·8 and 11·8 months, the frequency of grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events was

References (32)

  • LG Paz-Ares et al.

    PARAMOUNT: final overall survival results of the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • FS Hodi et al.

    Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • C Robert et al.

    Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma

    N Engl J Med

    (2011)
  • C Robert et al.

    Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation

    N Engl J Med

    (2015)
  • RJ Motzer et al.

    Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma

    N Engl J Med

    (2015)
  • JR Brahmer et al.

    Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small cell lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2015)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text