Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 18, Issue 1, January 2017, Pages 75-87
The Lancet Oncology

Articles
Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30559-9Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have activity in ovarian carcinomas with homologous recombination deficiency. Along with BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) might also represent homologous recombination deficiency. In ARIEL2, we assessed the ability of tumour genomic LOH, quantified with a next-generation sequencing assay, to predict response to rucaparib, an oral PARP inhibitor.

Methods

ARIEL2 is an international, multicentre, two-part, phase 2, open-label study done at 49 hospitals and cancer centres in Australia, Canada, France, Spain, the UK, and the USA. In ARIEL2 Part 1, patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive, high-grade ovarian carcinoma were classified into one of three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups on the basis of tumour mutational analysis: BRCA mutant (deleterious germline or somatic), BRCA wild-type and LOH high (LOH high group), or BRCA wild-type and LOH low (LOH low group). We prespecified a cutoff of 14% or more genomic LOH for LOH high. Patients began treatment with oral rucaparib at 600 mg twice per day for continuous 28 day cycles until disease progression or any other reason for discontinuation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. All patients treated with at least one dose of rucaparib were included in the safety analyses and all treated patients who were classified were included in the primary endpoint analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01891344. Enrolment into ARIEL2 Part 1 is complete, although an extension (Part 2) is ongoing.

Findings

256 patients were screened and 206 were enrolled between Oct 30, 2013, and Dec 19, 2014. At the data cutoff date (Jan 18, 2016), 204 patients had received rucaparib, with 28 patients remaining in the study. 192 patients could be classified into one of the three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups: BRCA mutant (n=40), LOH high (n=82), or LOH low (n=70). Tumours from 12 patients were established as BRCA wild-type, but could not be classified for LOH, because of insufficient neoplastic nuclei in the sample. The median duration of treatment for the 204 patients was 5·7 months (IQR 2·8–10·1). 24 patients in the BRCA mutant subgroup, 56 patients in the LOH high subgroup, and 59 patients in the LOH low subgroup had disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival after rucaparib treatment was 12·8 months (95% CI 9·0–14·7) in the BRCA mutant subgroup, 5·7 months (5·3–7·6) in the LOH high subgroup, and 5·2 months (3·6–5·5) in the LOH low subgroup. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the BRCA mutant (hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·16–0·44, p<0·0001) and LOH high (0·62, 0·42–0·90, p=0·011) subgroups compared with the LOH low subgroup. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (45 [22%] patients), and elevations in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (25 [12%]). Common serious adverse events included small intestinal obstruction (10 [5%] of 204 patients), malignant neoplasm progression (10 [5%]), and anaemia (nine [4%]). Three patients died during the study (two because of disease progression and one because of sepsis and disease progression). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Interpretation

In patients with BRCA mutant or BRCA wild-type and LOH high platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinomas treated with rucaparib, progression-free survival was longer than in patients with BRCA wild-type LOH low carcinomas. Our results suggest that assessment of tumour LOH can be used to identify patients with BRCA wild-type platinum-sensitive ovarian cancers who might benefit from rucaparib. These results extend the potential usefulness of PARP inhibitors in the treatment setting beyond BRCA mutant tumours.

Funding

Clovis Oncology, US Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program, Stand Up To Cancer—Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance—National Ovarian Cancer Coalition Dream Team Translational Research Grant, and V Foundation Translational Award.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of death due to cancer in women in both the USA and European Union.1, 2 Mutations in one allele of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) accompanied by loss of the wild-type allele hinders homologous recombination-mediated DNA damage repair,3 leading to loss or duplication of chromosomal regions, also known as genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH).4, 5, 6 Half of all high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas are estimated to have homologous recombination deficiency, with about 15% of carcinomas harbouring a germline BRCA mutation, 6% a somatic BRCA mutation, and 20% a mutation in, or epigenetic silencing of, another homologous recombination gene.7, 8 Even without an identifiable mutation in BRCA or other known homologous recombination gene, many high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas show BRCA mutant-like genomic signatures,6, 9 which could serve as a downstream marker of homologous recombination deficiency.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes are involved in DNA repair through activation of the base excision repair and alternative end-joining pathways and inhibition of the non-homologous end-joining pathway.10, 11 PARP inhibition in cells with homologous recombination deficiency is postulated to cause accumulation of unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks, ultimately leading to cell death.10, 11, 12 Consequently, PARP inhibitors are selectively lethal in cells with homologous recombination deficiency.10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 In clinical trials, PARP inhibitors have shown antitumour activity and extended progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with or without a BRCA mutation;19, 20, 21, 22 however, the optimal method for the identification of which BRCA wild-type cancers are most likely to respond to a PARP inhibitor is unknown.20, 21, 22, 23

Results from a phase 1/2 study24 of rucaparib, an oral PARP inhibitor, have shown efficacy and safety in women with relapsed, platinum-sensitive, high-grade ovarian carcinoma harbouring a germline BRCA mutation, with 22 (67%) of 33 patients achieving an objective response. The aim of ARIEL2 Part 1 was to identify molecular predictors of rucaparib sensitivity in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent high-grade ovarian carcinoma, including tumours without a germline or somatic BRCA mutation.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

ARIEL2 is an international, multicentre, two-part, phase 2, open-label study designed to assess rucaparib sensitivity in three prospectively defined subgroups (appendix pp 6). The study protocol is available in the appendix. Data are presented for ARIEL2 Part 1, which has completed enrolment; an extension (Part 2) of ARIEL2, added through a protocol amendment (May 11, 2015), is ongoing and will be published separately.

Investigators at each site identified eligible patients according to

Results

Between Oct 30, 2013, and Dec 19, 2014, 256 patients were screened and 206 patients were enrolled into the trial (figure 1). At the data cutoff date (Jan 18, 2016), 204 patients had been treated with rucaparib, with 28 patients remaining on study medication. The median duration of treatment for the 204 patients was 5·7 months (IQR 2·8–10·1). 192 treated patients could be classified into one of the three predefined homologous recombination deficiency subgroups: BRCA mutant (n=40), LOH high

Discussion

The results of ARIEL2 Part 1 show the activity of rucaparib in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive, high-grade ovarian carcinoma. Our data also support the ability of a homologous recombination deficiency signature identified by an algorithm combining the percentage of tumour genomic LOH with BRCA mutation status to identify patients who may benefit from rucaparib treatment. To our knowledge, ARIEL2 is the first study to prospectively use a tumour-based, next-generation sequencing

References (42)

  • J Ferlay et al.

    GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11

    (2013)
  • JA Watkins et al.

    Genomic scars as biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency and drug response in breast and ovarian cancers

    Breast Cancer Res

    (2014)
  • V Abkevich et al.

    Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer

    Br J Cancer

    (2012)
  • B Pedersen et al.

    Copy neutral loss of heterozygosity is more frequent in older ovarian cancer patients

    Genes Chromosomes Cancer

    (2013)
  • AM Marquard et al.

    Pan-cancer analysis of genomic scar signatures associated with homologous recombination deficiency suggests novel indications for existing cancer drugs

    Biomark Res

    (2015)
  • Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma

    Nature

    (2011)
  • KP Pennington et al.

    Germline and somatic mutations in homologous recombination genes predict platinum response and survival in ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinomas

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2014)
  • PA Konstantinopoulos et al.

    Gene expression profile of BRCAness that correlates with responsiveness to chemotherapy and with outcome in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • SB De Lorenzo et al.

    The elephant and the blind men: making sense of PARP inhibitors in homologous recombination deficient tumor cells

    Front Oncol

    (2013)
  • CL Scott et al.

    Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: recent advances and future development

    J Clin Oncol

    (2015)
  • R Ceccaldi et al.

    Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours are dependent on Poltheta-mediated repair

    Nature

    (2015)
  • Cited by (912)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Contributed equally

    View full text