Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 14, Issue 12, November 2013, Pages 1208-1215
The Lancet Oncology

Articles
Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70447-9Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Previous results of the EORTC intergroup trial 40983 showed that perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) increases progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery alone for patients with initially resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Here we present overall survival data after long-term follow-up.

Methods

This randomised, controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study recruited patients from 78 hospitals across Europe, Australia, and Hong Kong. Eligible patients aged 18–80 years who had histologically proven colorectal cancer and up to four liver metastases were randomly assigned (1:1) to either perioperative FOLFOX4 or surgery alone. Perioperative FOLFOX4 consisted of six 14-day cycles of oxaliplatin 85mg/m2, folinic acid 200 mg/m2 (DL form) or 100 mg/m2 (L form) on days 1–2 plus bolus, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 (bolus) and 600 mg/m2 (continuous 22 h infusion), before and after surgery. Patients were centrally randomised by minimisation, adjusting for centre and risk score and previous adjuvant chemotherapy to primary surgery for colorectal cancer, and the trial was open label. Analysis of overall survival was by intention to treat in all randomly assigned patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00006479.

Findings

Between Oct 10, 2000, and July 5, 2004, 364 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group (182 patients in each group, of which 171 per group were eligible and 152 per group underwent resection). At a median follow-up of 8·5 years (IQR 7·6–9·5), 107 (59%) patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group had died versus 114 (63%) in the surgery-only group (HR 0·88, 95% CI 0·68–1·14; p=0·34). In all randomly assigned patients, median overall survival was 61·3 months (95% CI 51·0–83·4) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 54·3 months (41·9–79·4) in the surgery alone group. 5-year overall survival was 51·2% (95% CI 43·6–58·3) in the perioperative chemotherapy group versus 47·8% (40·3–55·0) in the surgery-only group. Two patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group and three in the surgery-only group died from complications of protocol surgery, and one patient in the perioperative chemotherapy group died possibly as a result of toxicity of protocol treatment.

Interpretation

We found no difference in overall survival with the addition of perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 compared with surgery alone for patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. However, the previously observed benefit in PFS means that perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 should remain the reference treatment for this population of patients.

Funding

Norwegian and Swedish Cancer Societies, Cancer Research UK, Ligue Nationale Contre Cancer, US National Cancer Institute, Sanofi-Aventis.

Introduction

Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for resectable liver metastases; however, only 15–20% of patients with hepatic metastases are initially eligible for a radical surgical approach. The proportion of patients who achieve 5-year survival after resection ranges from 20% to 50%.1, 2 After liver resection with curative intent, recurrences are reported in two-thirds of patients, half occurring in the residual liver.3, 4, 5 The most likely explanation for recurrence is the persistence of microscopic residual disease after surgery. Therefore, combining chemotherapy with resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases is of major interest. So far, the results of randomised trials of adjuvant chemotherapy given after liver resection either intravenously or through the hepatic artery have provided some indication that prognosis has improved, but the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy has not yet been formally proven.6, 7, 8, 9

For that reason, our study group proposed to assess the use of perioperative chemotherapy (ie, before and after surgery) in a randomised phase 3 trial, even in patients with resectable disease—the rationale being that this method would treat micrometastatic disease. In patients without (readily) resectable disease, further aims were to increase the proportion of patients who have a complete resection and to reduce the size of liver metastases, therefore helping to improve results of hepatectomies.

Previously published results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) intergroup trial 4098310 (EPOC) showed that the combination of perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and surgery increases progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery alone for patients with liver-only metastases from colorectal cancer deemed resectable on preoperative imaging. The absolute difference in the proportion of patients alive and progression free at 3 years was 7·3% (3-year PFS was 28·1% [95·66% CI 21·3–35·3] in the surgery-only group compared with 35·4% [28·1–42·7] in the perioperative chemotherapy group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·79 [0·62–1·02]; p=0·058) in all randomised patients. For all patients eligible for analysis—ie, those who were assessed by the study coordinator to fulfil eligibility criteria as defined in the protocol—the absolute difference in 3-year PFS was 8·1% (28·1% [95·66% CI 21·2–36·6] in the surgery-only group vs 36·2% [28·7–43·8] in the perioperative chemotherapy group; HR 0·77 [0·60–1·00]; p=0·041). A higher proportion of patients had reversible postoperative complications after chemotherapy with surgery than after surgery alone (40 [25%] of 159 vs 27 [16%] of 171; p=0·0401). However, the proportion of patients who were operated on who had a non-therapeutic laparotomy was lower in the perioperative chemotherapy group than in the surgery-only group (eight [5%] of 159 patients vs 18 [11%] of 171 patients; p=0·069).

After extended follow-up, we aimed to compare the secondary outcome of overall survival in patients who received perioperative chemotherapy with those who received surgery alone.

Section snippets

Study design and patients

The EORTC intergroup trial 40983 was a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Details of the trial design and study procedures have been reported previously.10 Patients were recruited from 78 hospitals in Australia, Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the UK. Eligible patients were aged 18–80 years, with a WHO performance status of 2 or less, histologically proven colorectal cancer, one to four liver metastases that were resectable, and no

Results

As previously reported, between Oct 10, 2000, and July 5, 2004, 364 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group (182 patients in each group; figure 1). Baseline tumour and patient characteristics were similar between the two groups, and 188 (52%) of all 364 patients had only one metastatic liver lesion (table 1). Of the 182 patients in each group, 171 were considered to be part of the eligible population for analysis and 152 underwent resection.

After a median follow-up of 8·5 years

Discussion

Our long-term overall survival analysis showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between perioperative chemotherapy and surgery alone; however, median overall survival was longer in the perioperative group, and a greater proportion of patients were alive at 5 years than in the surgery alone group (panel).

The failure to show a significant difference in overall survival might be explained by several reasons. First, this trial was designed to detect a PFS benefit and was

References (18)

  • B Nordlinger et al.

    Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • Y Fong et al.

    Liver resection for colorectal metastases

    J Clin Oncol

    (1997)
  • S Kopetz et al.

    Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2009)
  • Y Fong

    Hepatic colorectal metastasis: current surgical therapy, selection criteria for hepatectomy, and role for adjuvant therapy

    Adv Surg

    (2000)
  • Y Fong et al.

    Surgical therapy of hepatic colorectal metastasis

    Semin Oncol

    (1999)
  • MC de Jong et al.

    Rates and patterns of recurrence following curative intent surgery for colorectal liver metastasis. An international multi-institutional analysis of 1669 patients

    Ann Surg

    (2009)
  • DG Power et al.

    Role of adjuvant therapy after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • MM Kemeny et al.

    Combined modality treatment for resectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver: surgical resection of hepatic metastases in combination with continuous infusion of chemotherapy. An intergroup study

    J Clin Oncol

    (2002)
  • M Lorenz et al.

    Randomized trial of surgery versus surgery followed by adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for liver metastases of colorectal cancer

    Ann Surg

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (984)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text